Vigilant Fox reports that FDA has to remove social media posts about Ivermectin
But still pushes a false narrative
In a massive win for truth and medical freedom, the FDA has to remove ALL social media content and consumer advisories on ivermectin usage.
Dr. McCullough previously said that the FDA should be sued for misleading the public by spreading misinformation on Ivermectin's ability to treat COVID-19 – causing unnecessary deaths.
Now, it's happening.
The complaint cites U.S. law, including the provision that the FDA “may not interfere with the authority of a health care provider to prescribe or administer any legally marked device to a patient for any condition or disease within a legitimate health care practitioner-patient relationship.”
Dr. Bowden, one of the plaintiffs in this lawsuit, writes:
"FDA loses its war on ivermectin and agrees to remove all social media posts and consumer directives regarding ivermectin and COVID, including its most popular tweet in FDA history. This landmark case sets an important precedent in limiting FDA overreach into the doctor-patient relationship."
This is good news. The FDA is removing Ivermectin disinformation.
Vigilant Ferret, however, as always, includes a false premise in his or her anonymous reporting. Vigilant Fox is a Plandemic disinformation media outlet.
There was no viral Pandemic. Vigilant Fox once again pimps Peter McCullough saying that Ivermectin cures “COVID,” which is, I’m afraid, a bunch of horse manure.
It’s no secret that Ivermectin was very effective in saving lives of hospitalized patients who had an absolutely meaningless “COVID-positive" PCR test result. That’s a fact. But what did Ivermectin “cure?”
These patients very likely had bacterial pneumonia, not a mystery virus that leaked from a lab and spread around the world “asymptomatically” until it showed up in hospitals and starting killing people at a high rate. That’s crazy when you think about it.
I reconnected w/ (Beth Parlato) over the weekend…hero lawyer who represented Jason Jones and his wife. She and co-counsel Ralph Lorigo filed 189 cases for hospitalized patients trying to get ivermectin. 80 cases went to hearings/trial. They won about 40 and lost about 40.
With the exception of Jason Jones, every single case lost the client died. Every case that was won, where the client got the ivermectin, the patient lived with exception of 2 (38/40.)
The remaining 109 cases that didn’t go to a hearing, unfortunately the court system along with hospital attorneys delayed proceedings…all those clients died before we could get into court.
I asked Dr. Bowden on Twitter once if Ivermectin cured bacterial pneumonia or a virus. I also posted this link to give her a reference. Secondary Bacterial Pneumonia Drove Many COVID-19 Deaths She did not reply.
Will somebody with $25,000 please bet Steve Kirsch, Peter McCullough, Mary Bowden or Vigilant Ferret that all of the 149 patients who tried to have Ivermectin administered under Court Order had bacterial pneumonia?
The FLCCC accounts never picked up on Dr. Bowden’s accounts of the mortality data surrounding the people who tried to get Ivermectin under Court Order.
Understand the gravity of the difference. On the one hand, hospitals and the government were suppressing effective cures for “COVID.” On the other hand, hospitals were killing their patients all along, and there was no virus. An analysis of the patients who tried to have Ivermectin adminstered under Court Order could go a long way to proving what really happened. And that’s the problem for the Controlled Opposition accounts. True data analysis is their enemy. Propaganda and Disinformation are their methods.
Just look at what the hospital protocols do to people. Image from Emily Miller of Emily Post’s News.
What do you think happened? Did Ivermectin cure Bacterial Pneumonia or a Mystery Virus?
Charles Wright
Look up Dr Wiley 1890's and FDA.
Drity money passing thru evil hands. Thanks Tom McDonald for yout music.