Another "Hospital Falsified the Death Certificate to read COVID" Case

The patient walked in with a cold and mild asthma. They stabbed him in the neck and called it COVID.

Discriminated Against for V Status

I don’t know what’s a greater shame in the COVID Holocaust, the doctors who commit murder for pay, the government and law enforcement officials who ignore it, or the private attorneys who ignore it.

My husband had a cold.  Neither of us suspected C-19, as he did not have a fever or present any other telltale sign of the virus.  On day 6 of his symptoms, he began to feel better. He worked as usual, ate dinner, seemed to be fine.  Later that evening he began wheezing (he had asthma).  He used a nebulizer, his breathing improved, and he went to bed.  In the morning his breathing was worse and he felt it was necessary to go to the ER for a breathing treatment.

The COVID-19 PCR test was the beginning of the end for many people with simple cold/flu symptoms. Hospitals killed them with Remdesivir and ventilators for which they were paid, and falsified the death certificates to read COVID, for which they were paid again.

The hospital refused to treat him unless he consented to a C-19 test, which he did.

He was scolded for taking up room in the ER because he was not vaccinated before the test was taken. 2 hours later he was told it was positive and that he would have to be admitted.  This was after they had given him a breathing treatment and oxygen and his saturation had returned to 100%.  The doctor told me they would keep him overnight for observation and he would probably come home the next day.  At this point I was also lectured and scolded regarding the vaccine which we had not yet received.

Here it comes.

The next morning I was told his numbers were lower and they had started him on remdesivir.

Many COVID murder cases follow the pattern where the patient is first poisoned with Remdesivir. Remdesivir poisoning creates their alibi to place the patient on a deadly ventilator.

Each day in the hospital his condition deteriorated, in direct connection to the doses of remdesivir he was given.  He would improve a bit, they would administer the drug, he would get worse.  I asked about alternative therapies and was mocked.  He was eventually placed on a bi-pap machine which caused his lung to collapse.  At this point I was told there was no alternative except a ventilator.

On September 1st I was informed that an ECMO machine had become available and was recommended to give my husband the best chance at a “full” recovery.

The American Lung Association says that ECMO machines were developed for babies and childen with severe heart and lung problems. This hospital took this big burly man with a cold and a little asthma and placed him on a ventilator after poisoning him with Remdesivir and denying him nutrition. The ALA says that they first started using the “ECMO machines” on adults in 2009 in the H1N1 pandemic.

In retrospect I wonder how many deaths described as H1N1 were actually created by the use ventilators.

Dr. Erik Osborn

“Historically, for about the last 40 years, ECMO has been used successfully in babies and children with severe lung failure or severe heart failure.

Only in the last 10 years or so have we been able to demonstrate that it can be used successfully for adults with lung failure. Specifically, during the 2009 H1N1 pandemic, we found that ECMO could be used successfully in adults with the most severe lung failure. Since then, there have been well done clinical studies that support the use of ECMO.”

They stabbed the patient in the jugular vein. This is not the typica case where hospitals wait for weeks to create bacterial pneumonia with the ventilator and opioids.

Kevin was transferred to a different department and a doctor who never contacted me attempted to place him on the ECMO machine without the use of an ultrasound (which I have since learned is necessary for placement of the cannula). This doctor perforated my husband’s jugular vein with the cannula, and apparently never checked its placement. The ECMO machine was turned on, essentially pumping my husband’s blood directly into his chest cavity.  The doctor ordered CPR while my husband bled to death.

They called it “COVID.”

A different doctor called to inform me of Kevin’s death.  I was then allowed to see my husband for the first time since he was admitted, although he was “still positive” for C-19.  His face and chest were bruised. He was filthy. No attempt had been made to clean or cover him before I arrived.  The doctor who had informed me of his death told me to get an autopsy, which I immediately requested.  That doctor seemed to suspect something had gone wrong with the ECMO procedure.

I found out later that the doctor who killed my husband never spoke to me that night – or ever- because he was filing the death certificate.  He listed C-19 as the cause and had it signed before my autopsy request was ordered and days before the autopsy was performed.

They hid the body for awhile so that an autopsy could not be performed.

My husband’s body was then “misplaced” by the hospital morgue and was not available for autopsy until it was “found” several days later.  Fortunately I was able to have the autopsy performed by the county medical examiner and not the hospital.  The autopsy clearly reports the misplacement of the cannula and the fatal blood loss volume present in Kevin’s chest cavity. But his death certificate was not corrected nonetheless.

Lawyers refused the case because “COVID” was on the death certificate.

I attempted to pursue legal action against the hospital and the doctor but was refused on the grounds that “gross negligence is almost impossible to prove,” – a sentence I heard from every lawyer who agreed to speak to me regarding the autopsy results.  Most heard the term C-19 and concluded the conversation.

In other news, a woman in Florida has filed suit against Hershey because she is upset that the candy she purchased did not have a smiley face on it as it appeared on the wrapper.

Anthony J. Russo of The Russo Firm in Delray Beach is handling the case, which now has over 100 members.

Let’s see if any attorneys show up on the comments section this time.

Charles Wright