Dr. Meryl Nass misrepresents a public transcript of Robert Malone to defend him
Anthrax vaccines, National Biodefense Science Board
A Substack blogger using the name La Gata Politica recently wrote a blog titled “Robert Malone Supported the Testing of Anthrax Vaccines on Children.”
La Gata referenced a comment Dr. Malone made in an October 28, 2011 public teleconference of the National Science Board. She said she came across the transcript by using Google search for information after reading a 2011 tweet that Robert Malone made about the Anthrax vaccine.
Dr. Nass said she la Gata had to be some sort of intelligence expert to find a document like the transcript: “Do you really think some refugee from nowhere is going to draw attention to themselves with a flaming post like this? Do you further believe that anyone but an intelligence professional was able to search the government’s databases and come up with the transcript of a meeting that happened to involve Robert Malone and me?” (I found it by typing in the title that Meryl Nass provided of the meeting into google). But anyway, here’s what Dr. Malone said on Twitter and to the Board.
That same day, Robert Malone had called into the National Biodefense Board to recommend “dose pairing in this pediatric population.”
The Cat didn’t like that at all, and said “If Robert Malone is so eager to test the Anthrax vaccine(s) on children, he should’ve volunteered his boys and all of the children within his extended families.”
(Edit, April 28, 2023. Vilma informed me that another tweet of Dr. Malone prompted her search. This is the tweet):
And here’s where Dr. Meryl Nass entered the defense of Malone. She changed the wording of Malone’s public recommendation from “dose pairing” to “dose sparing.” Nice.
“Malone spoke very briefly, and what he actually said was, given the known side effects, why don’t you try fewer doses in kids than are used in adults? He asked them to use a dose-sparing approach.” …
“And for that act of kindness and ethics the nincompoops rake him over the coals.”
I find Dr. Nass’s revision of the transcript to be unacceptable. First of all, Dr. Malone has been involved in a large number of biodefense/vaccine trials. It was how he made a living. He was not likely to have argued against another vaccine trial for another bioweapon here.
As his wife, Jill says: TEN BILLION DOLLARS... I am pretty proud of that number.
Below is a list of projects from 2011-2016 that Robert Malone and I (RW Malone MD, LLC) have provided direct leadership and proposal management in. That is almost ten billion dollars in the last five years. We helped win 562 million in contract awards and nine billion in IDIQ awards. That is ten billion dollars that these companies may not have won with out involvement. That is a whole lot of really important research that wouldn't have happened if it weren't for us, particularly Robert.
Malone’s 2017 CV showed some of the grants and contracts that summed to the approximately $9.562 Billion figure. At the very bottom, you can see he was involved as “proposal manager and principal scientific author” of “Vaxin: Contract by BARDA to develop next generation Anthrax Vaccine” for $21 million.
I don’t know how the contracts affected his call to the National Science Board. I don’t know if there were two vaccines tested or one, or what.
By dose pairing, I think he meant using two different vaccines for the same thing. (That’s speculation though). For example, the New York Times reported that dose pairing of the Pfizer and AstraZeneca vaccines for COVID might be a good idea.
Mixing Pfizer and AstraZeneca vaccines provides strong protection, according to a preliminary study.
Administering a first dose of one vaccine and a second dose of the other, in either order, is likely to provide potent protection, the researchers said.
Early results from a British vaccine study suggest that mixing different brands of vaccines can provoke a protective immune response against Covid-19. In the trial, volunteers produced high levels of antibodies and immune cells after getting one dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine and one dose of the AstraZeneca-Oxford shot.
Malone said “dose pairing” might help the AE (adverse event) profile of the Anthrax vaccine: “I suspect that that will be warranted due to the potential AE profile and hopefully might still enable sufficient immunogenicity.”
And I don’t see how the term “dose sparing” would fit in the sentence “advocate NIAID investments in dose pairing in this pediatric population.” It doesn’t fit to say the NIAID should “invest” in “sparing.”
P.S.
Some of you might remember an article I wrote on Malone’s tweets on the MMR vaccines on Jan 3, 2023: “Would Robert Malone like to clarify his position on MMR Vaccines and Autism?”
I never saw anything from Dr. Malone addressing the issue directly. He wrote something about glyphosate on April 19, 2023.
Here’s what I found interesting. Dr. Meryl Nass said she was asked to write an opinion on the MMR vaccines on February 19, 2023, in Alliance for Human Research Protection (AHRP).
Safety and Effectiveness of the MMR vaccine
“I’ve been asked to contrast the risk from the disease measles with the risk from the measles vaccine, usually the MMR. MMR stands for Measles, Mumps, Rubella…”
Dr. Nass mentioned several adverse events from the MMR vaccines in her review she was asked to do, but did not mention Autism among them. I’m planning on taking a longer look at a history of covering up the link between MMR vaccines and Autism.
Charles Wright
I find the "standardized e-cigarette" in-progress 2016 work interesting. When did the JUUL cig controversy break out? Do e-cigs already have some sort of vaccine in the mix?
Great stuff, Charles. Thank you for your work.
Funny about Nass and me. I *wanted* to like her at the beginning, the kindly grandmotherly type I guess. And yet I couldn't bring myself to read her efforts. Spidey sense, or something. I had the same thing with Malone, although with him it wasn't a sense it was like a fire alarm bell ringing in my head.
It is great to see people like you and Vilma willing to look behind the false flag currents the counter psyop people are throwing our way. And I'm spreading this information amongst my group as well, in small enough doses at times, so that they don't actually projectile vomit it out into a dark room and close the door.
The truth will out. It always does, with time and the work of the honest. Muchas gracias.