Dr. Urso, Please step out of the Hot Tub

I remember the excitement in your voice in August 2020 when you described the results of a study using chlorinoquine. It seemed like an epiphany on the relationship between cancer and viruses.

You just proved when viruses and chloroquine are around, chloroquine will let the virus attack a cancer cell. Think about that.

But wait a minute. Haven’t we been taught that viruses cause cancer?

Image courtesy of Dr. Pierre Kory, Twitter, Sweden, January 2023.

I’ve thought about it.

If it is the case that viruses cause cancer, then, why would your hot tub partner breed mice to create cancer under the theory that those mice without “proviral DNA” (mouse mammary tumor virus) were more likely to develop cancer? They even proved their theory. “…mammary neoplasias can occur in the absence of MuMTV DNA.” Malone and colleagues bred the mice in two groups, ev (endogenous virus) positive and ev negative, for several generations, in order to successfully create tumors in the ev negative group.

Reference: Hyperplastic and neoplastic changes in the mammary glands of feral mice free of endogenous mouse mammary tumor virus provirus. L J Faulkin, D J Mitchell, L J Young, D W Morris, R W Malone, R D Cardiff, M B Gardner PMID: 6090752, J Natl Cancer Inst.1984 Oct;73(4):971-82.

That’s right, Malone and his evil colleagues bred mice from two groups, one group with the MuMTV (ev positive), and one without (ev negative), with the goal of creating cancer. They fed DMBA to 42 of the mice. DMBA is a strong immunosuppressor and carcinogen.

Wikipedia: “7,12-Dimethylbenz[a]anthracene (DMBA) is an immunosuppressor and a powerful organ-specific laboratory carcinogen.^[2] DMBA is widely used in many research laboratories studying cancer. DMBA serves as a tumor initiator. Tumor promotion can be induced with treatments of 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (TPA) in some models of two-stage carcinogenesis.^[3] This allows for a greatly accelerated rate of tumor growth, making many cancer studies possible.”

Which means that they were testing the ability of the “proviral DNA,” MuMTV, to retard the tumor growth that the scientists had initiated with the immunosuppressor and cancinogen DMBA.

The mice were resistant. As it says above, “the mice were very resistant to spontaneous or chemically induced mammary tumors.” But after enough generations of breeding, Malone et al produced their tumors in the group without mouse mammary tumor virus (MuMTV).

This paper was submitted March 1984. Malone would have been 24 years old and an undergraduate or recent graduate at UC Davis. Malone, whose father and father-in-law had ties to the intelligence community, had also been given a “President's Undergraduate Fellowship Grant for Investigation of Oncogene Expression in Breast Tumor Tissue: 1983 – 1984” at UC-Davis. 

This period was perhaps the height of the Cold War. Reference- NATO Operation Able Archer, 1983, where the Soviet Union believed that NATO was acutally going to attack them during a NATO exercise. I suppose some people in the intelligence community on all sides believed that they were doing bad things for good reasons back then, like creating cancer-causing weapons. All the war weapons, evil necessities.

Later, Malone would say that he had a nervous breakdown when he discovered how evil science was. After Malone went to the Salk Institute at UC San Diego under Inder Verma: “I ended up with a diagnosis of PTSD and a nervous breakdown.  At 28.   I got to learn about big science or it learned me good.” (Reference: Interview to Tucker Carlson, February 2022). Malone claims his PTSD was due to patent disputes, and has never said that Science has intentionally created Cancer in the population, even though we see that it clearly has been done via the COVID mRNA vaccines today, and was also done at the Salk Institute with their “Polio” vaccines.

On viruses and cancer, reversal of cause and effect is an old disinformation trick. I believe that the entire medical establishment today is a victim of it. Correlation is not necessarily causation. When they tell correlation isn’t causation, it is, and when they tell you it is, it isn’t. How would you know on a “micro” level? You jab and trust, you die, they lie, wash rinse repeat. You should be able to see the “macro” level by now.

Dr. Urso, my task, and yours if you choose to accept it, is to decode and correct the evil that man has created with scientific method. Beyond any shred of doubt, your colleague and hot tub partner Robert Malone has been involved in the intentional creation of cancer in the human race.

These SV40 “fragments” in the Pfizer vaccines? Are they really viruses? Why do they cause cancer? What’s going on here? Robert Malone has patents that mention SV40 fragments which appear to be similar to those in the Pfizer vaccines. Malone said that he was in negotiations with Pfizer over this Patent below.

Oncogenes, or something similar, are part of the problem. Another big part of the problem is that the spike proteins generated by the vaccines turn off tumor fighting abilities of the body.

Jiang and Mei published: SARS-CoV-2 Spike Impairs DNA Damage Repair and Inhibits V(D)J Recombination In Vitro on October 13, 2021. (As the number of cases of “Turbo Cancer” skyrocketed, that paper has was retracted).

Jiang and Mei:

"Mechanistically, we found that the spike protein localizes in the nucleus and inhibits DNA damage repair by impeding key DNA repair protein BRCA1 and 53BP1 recruitment to the damage site. Our findings reveal a potential molecular mechanism by which the spike protein might impede adaptive immunity and underscore the potential side effects of full-length spike-based vaccines."

Dr. Mikolas Rasjek reviewed the finding of Jiang and Mei:

“Now BRCA1, if you mutate that gene, it’s one of the highest predispositional mutations for cancer that you can have, is mutations in this particular gene, precisely because BRCA genes code for proteins that are involved in fixing DNA damage, such as fixing DNA that’s sheared in half. So this is clearly news of great significance, and it should not be taken lightly. It should be reinvestigated, reconfirmed…"

So “Turbo Cancer” appears to involve both accelerating the growth of tumors and mutating the genes that fight tumors.

The Salk Institute under Inder Verma was focused on turning on an off genes.

Robert Malone: …the other part of Inder’s lab was focused on gene expression, that’s the control of transcription and etc.  So turning genes on and off.  The dominant hypothesis was that there was some sort of gene silencing that was going on turning off these foreign retroviral sequences. - (Robert Malone in interview to 2021 (July 12) interview on "The Ripple Effect)"

Inder Verma, with a Ph.D. from Israel in 1971, then post-doc at MIT at 1974 before heading to the Salk Institute, was awarded

The American Association of Cancer Research says of Verma:

Through his research, Dr. Verma has worked to create a superior mouse model of cancer by utilizing modified viruses to effectively deliver activated oncogenes to specific target cells within immunocompetent mice. By using this approach to promote carcinogenesis, Dr. Verma and his team have been able to uncover valuable new insights into the genetic etiologies of various cancers.

All these Sons of Bitches do is create disease.

Then there is technology to direct the Turbo Cancer effect to various parts of the body with Lipid Nanoparticles. Dr. Urso, you spoke about this to Dr. Malone, do you remember? You said “top scientists” had to know what they were doing. (Robert Malone has long been involved with lipid nanoparticles.

Dr. Malone immediately launched into a word salad 5th generation compartmentalized mass formation psychobabble defense, remember?

Image below from an article on Global COVID Summit, written by Robert Malone, September 2023.

Twitter Space, January 8, 2023:

1:40:55. Dr. Robert Malone: “At this point, I haven’t seen anything that says to me that Pfizer or Bill Gates or Harari or Klaus Schwab or Tedros or any of the others envisioned, or the senior scientists at the vaccine research center, envisioned that this would be a lethal bioweapon and I frankly object to that language that’s often bandied about without any clear evidence to support it other than inference. I think this is very dangerous and it will be weaponized against as these things often are. So I just don’t go there. I hope I’ve answered your question.

1:41:47.  Dr. Richard Urso:  “Can I tag onto Robert?  I think the inference is a simple one.  The distribution of lipid nanoparticles is well known prior to this rollout.  They definitely go to brain, heart, bone marrow, adrenals, and, as is shown, ovaries.  Ovaries have lots of H2 receptors.  They’re going to cause inflammation.  The very thought that someone wouldn’t think that it might affect fertility is absurd. …  Over.”

(Long Pause)

Dr. Robert Malone:  1:42:42.  “To go down that road, (Urso says “UHH”) we have to dive into issues of the groupthink that happens in pharmaceutical industry development.   I know you’re well familiar with that as are many others here, and and I, I caution that uhh what we may have observed and encountered and been subjected to, uhh, umm, may well be the consequence of a form of uhh, uhh, blindness, due to self interest and and ummm silo organization within pharma, and within the government.  So that uhh, no, very few people are aware of of the full scope and and they all kind of sit within their own little silos.  And think about the things that they’re supposed to think about and not talk about other things.  Umm I think that what what has transpired personally is that it umm wasn’t until there was some folks coming in from the outside that, and perhaps you’re one of those, looking at the whole sum of what was transpiring, umm, that were able to assemble the pieces and break through the cloud of propaganda et cetera that we all are subjected to.  So good on you for having done it.  But I, I, I, umm, it is possible, that, uhh, people were so siloed, that, umm, they didn’t question, umm, what was transpiring and they didn’t really question the safety and effectiveness.  They just kind of went from day to day, umm, following orders, and thinking that they were responding effectively to a public health crisis.  That is an alternative explanation, over.” 

Richard Urso:   “Yeah, please let me address that.  I agree with you Robert, very much.  My point being that the top scientists had to know.  Umm, there may be many others did not, but the top scientists who had worked with lipid nanoparticles would be very familiar with this.  And and so there were people who had to know.  And so agree with you.   That’s why you’ve never heard me say it’s uhh some kind of population agenda thing.  I just have never gone there either, because I don’t have any facts of that record.  I mean to say that.  But I actually feel very comfortable saying that I know top scientists that are in this field that helped developed these, had to know in some sense that it might have an effect and should have potentially been carefully looked at.”      

Let me put this into context for you, Dr. Urso. Being associated and photographed with Dr. Malone is like those people back in the 1930s who were cavorting with Nazis while ignoring the reports of their atrocities. Things are literally that bad, and maybe worse. Dr. Malone is like a cross between propaganda minister Joseph Goebbels and the sadistic Nazi genetic scientist Joseph Mengele. I’m serious. History will prove me right on that.

So if I was you, I would completely disassociate myself with Dr. Malone and help the world try to correct what has been done. Please and thank you.

Charles Wright