Hearst Corporation, owner of Houston Chronicle, is on the wrong side of History again
Hitler and Pharma
Although it is generally considered inappropriate to make comparisons to the Holocaust in Germany, I believe that if those people were alive today they would be screaming at people about why they aren't speaking up about the similarities. William Randolph Hearst, in September 1934, contracted with Adolph Hitler to improve his image in the United States by providing favorable reporting after numerous news reports fairly reported him as a dangerous and evil man in 1933-1934.
Today the Houston Chronicle, owned by Hearst Corporation, repeats "disinformation" narratives provided to them by pharmaceutical companies and various government agencies on the safety and effectiveness of the COVID-19 vaccines. They further repeat disinformation narratives on the infinitely superior competing methods of treatment used by doctors in private practice, a case study of which is Dr. Mary Bowden in Houston.
On November 12, 2021, reporter Julian Gill from the Houston Chronicle contacted Dr. Mary Bowden by email and asked her for a comment on her suspension from Houston Methodist Hospital, of which she was unaware. Later that day, Gill published an article titled "Houston Methodist suspends River Oaks doctor for spreading COVID misinformation." The "misinformation" Gill referred to were comments such as “ivermectin works” and “vaccine mandates are wrong," according to an article written by Dr. Bowden. Houston Methodist made their claims of "misinformation" from Dr. Bowden public that day.
In fact though, it was Houston Methodist and the Houston Chronicle who were spreading disinformation. (A clarification on the difference between "dis" and "mis" information: the way the words are used today, "disinformation" means to deliberately provide false information, and "misinformation" means to mistakenly provide false information).
My use of the term "disinformation" in this article means to knowingly or recklessly lie or misrepresent COVID and COVID-19 vaccine statistics in an effort to trick the public into taking a deadly poison while hiding the resulting COVID-19 vaccine death statistics in other statistical categories, and to lie about the safety and effectiveness of
various “early treatments” as described by multiple doctors.
In his article stating that Dr. Bowden was suspended for "misinformation," Gill published a disinformation statistic from the Texas DSHS: "A report released Monday by the Texas Department of State Health Services says unvaccinated people were 13 times more likely to become infected and 20 times more likely to die compared with vaccinated people. Among the nearly 29,000 COVID deaths in the state, 85 percent were unvaccinated, the report said."
Gill, to his credit, did note the objection of Dr. Bowden to the characterization of her successful COVID treatments as "misinformation:" “All of my comments are backed by clinical experience,” Bowden told the Chronicle. “I have been open seven days a week since the pandemic began, performing over 80,000 COVID tests and treating over 2,000 patients with COVID.”
There are four main points that prove that the parroting the Texas DSHS statistic quoted by Julian Gill is spreading disinformation.
One. The state of Texas DSHS announced they had began distributing Remdesivir on May 20, 2020. The primary cause of a large unknown quantity of deaths in the DSHS statistic were due to the administration of Remdesivir, and were falsely attributed to "COVID" while unvaccinated. This fact alone makes the Texas DHSH statistic invalid.
Two. The state of Texas DSHS statistics falsely listed the deaths of people who are vaccinated within 14 days after vaccinations as unvaccinated. The primary cause of a large unknown quantity of deaths in the DSHS statistic were due to the administration of COVID-19 vaccines, and were falsely attributed to "COVID" while unvaccinated. This fact alone makes the Texas DHSH statistic invalid.
Three. The deceptive nature of the "ratio" reported by the state of Texas DSHS. Texas quotes ratios for a reason. This will take a minute to explain. The ratio of unvaccinated death percentage divided by vaccinated death percentage is an exponentially increasing function as vaccinations increase, holding all other factors constant. This is the most recent Texas statistic. For the period October 9, 2021, you would divide 11.8 by .7 and come of with their "more likely to die" statistic, for instance.
Assume you have 1,000,000 people in population. The population is divided into two groups: vaccinated and unvaccinated. Vaccinations begin. Apply an equal quantity of death to both groups: 1 death. In period 1, one out of 1 million unvaccinated die. In period one million, 1 out of 1 unvaccinated die. one death for both groups. The ratio we will quote is unvaccinated death % / vaccinated death %. In period one, 1/1,000,000 is divided by 1/1.
This is statistical "disinformation." In period 1, "you are a million times more likely to die if you are vaccinated." In period one million, "you are a million times more likely to die if you are unvaccinated." The ratio of unvaccinated death percentage divided by vaccinated death percentage is an exponentially increasing function as vaccinations increase. It is deceptive and inappropriate to use this ratio because it creates false impression of rising unvaccinated death percentage as vaccinations rise. This fact alone makes the Texas DHSH statistic invalid.
Also note above that the state of Texas hides the "vaccinated" category in their most recent statistics, and only quote "fully vaccinated." That is another form of blatant statistical disinformation from the state of Texas DHSH, because it hided their vaccinated deaths. Quoting the "fully vaccinated" statistic, while ignoring the large number of "vaccinated" deaths along the way, is like saying that 100% of people in the "Trail of Tears" made it there alive. It's unclear to me if Texas was hiding the "vaccinated" category in the period question, November 2021, when Julian Gill quoted the Texas DHSH COVID vaccine death disinformation ratio. This fact alone makes the Texas DHSH statistic invalid whenever they first began to use it.
The statistics they are using are pure 100% deception designed to hide vaccine deaths and blame them on the unvaccinated while creating a lie in public perception that their deadly toxins actually save lives. Should you and I expect a journalist from the Houston Chronicle to read the fine print of the statistics he is quoting and use high school algebra to question the statistic? I believe so, because Julian Gill also quoted Dr. Mary Bowden on her 100% successful treatment ratio.
Four. The information provided by Dr. Bowden that she had successfully treated over 2,000 patients with COVID. “I have been open seven days a week since the pandemic began, performing over 80,000 COVID tests and treating over 2,000 patients with COVID." Mr. Gill should have taken it upon himself to question how a doctor in private practice could successfully keep over 2,000 COVID patients alive while they died at the rates he quoted from the DSHS. (Dr. Bowden’s recent reports state that she has treated over 4,000 COVID patients with a 100% survival rate). The baseline of COVID deaths is at or near zero for unvaccinated people if they seek the treatment of doctors like Dr. Bowden. Dr. Bowden's information was farm more than enough probable cause for Julian Gill to question the Texas DSHS ratio and apply a little junior high algebra.
I suspect that the Hearst Corporation demands and rewards the reporting of disinformation favoring vaccines. Numerous articles from multiple journalists in the Houston Chronicle universally parrot the blatant and deadly disinformation statistics provided by the murderers in government and pharma.
Now, moving onto William Randolph Hearst and his connection to Adolph Hitler. This is a paid section below this point. This became a fairly deep dive into the Spanish American War, Yellow Journalism, and World War 1, leading up to Hearst's meeting with Hitler in 1934. Many of the facts I will present are not well-known in the public and I think the public would benefit from understanding them.
If you would like to support my research, a good way to do so is by purchasing a paid subscription. If not- long story short, Hitler had an image problem in the United States after doing a lot of evil and scary things, and Hearst thought he would help him out.
Let's begin with some background on William Randolph Hearst.
William Randolph Hearst was born in 1863. William's father, George Hearst, was a gold miner who was elected to the state of California legislature as a Democrat in 1865. In 1880, George accepted ownership of the San Francisco Examiner as payment for a gambling debt owed to him. George found the newspaper useful to promote his political interests and those of the Democratic party.
The media tactics proved fruitful for George Hearst. In 1886 he was appointed to the United States Senate to fill a vacant seat. He held the seat in the 1887 election and served as Senator until 1891.
A note of trivia here: In the 1870s, newspapers were called "rags" because they were printed on recycled cloth. Cloth was being replaced by wood pulp in the 1870s. Hearst would go on to make a good deal of money off timber supplying newspapers with pulp. Jack Herer, who wrote the Emperor Wears no Clothes, reported that this was the reason that hemp was made illegal, because it was a competitor for wood pulp. By my analysis, that was a factor, but a relatively small one compared to the competition that cannabis posed to the chemotherapy industry (replacing medicine), steel, plastics, and so on, but that would take a very long explanation in itself. I hope to get around to it one day.
William Randolph Hearst took over the San Francisco Examiner in 1887 after being expelled from Harvard. He became editor and publisher of the Examiner, "approaching the newspaper business with great enthusiasm—and a lot of money."
In 1895, William moved to New York and acquired the New York Journal. Hearst entered into a competition for newspaper sales with Joseph Pulitzer, owner of New York World. Hearst raided the New York World for its top talent. He famously hired Richard Felton Outcault, who published the comic based on a character "the yellow kid."
This era is where the term "yellow journalism" began. Both newspapers published their versions of the "yellow kid." Both the Journal of Hearst and the World of Pulitzer also began publishing increasingly exaggerated and sensationalized articles in their competition for readers. These two newspapers were the original "fake news." This leads to the role of yellow journalism in the Spanish-American war.
Whether coordinated or not, the sensationalized media style of the Journal and World dovetailed with an apparent false-flag operation of the United States government to sink a US Navy ship, the USS Maine, in the harbor of Havana, Cuba. The sinking of the USS Maine was blamed on Spain as an act of War.
On June 1, 1896, Lieutenant William Kimball of the United States Navy published a "Plan of Operations against Spain." I suggest you read through the complete Plan published by the US NAVY. If you will read it, I don't think further comment is necessary on my part to establish that the United States hoped for an event that would lead to a war with Spain on the seas.
"It is apparent that the real cause of the war will be friction between the United States and Spain upon the Cuban question, and that war will arise as the direct result of some act of one of the countries which the other cannot tolerate. Whatever may be the especial act that leads to rupture of peaceful relations, it would seem to be a foregone conclusion that the object of the war to be waged by the United States would be to liberate Cuba from Spanish rule, to exact from Spain a fair war indemnity for the cost of the war, and to force a settlement of the particular question which was the direct cause of the outbreak of hostilities."
"Taking into consideration the financial conditions, naval strengths and general war resources of the two countries, and the possible practicable application of these for attack and defense of each, it would seem that, if the object of the war were to be attained in the most economic manner possible, the better policy for the United States to adopt would be one in which the utilization of its superior sea power were contemplated, one in which a purely naval war were intended, a war of blockades, bombardments, harrassments, naval descents on exposed colonies, naval actions whenever they can be brought on under fair conditions, i.e., whenever Spanish fleets or ships can be engaged by an equal or superior United States naval force outside of efficient support from Spanish shore works-; a war of cutting off supplies to the Spaniards in Cuba and furnishing these and war material of all kinds as well as a recruiting ground to the Cuban government.
During the period from around 1896 until the sinking of the USS Maine in 1898, tensions were rising in Cuba between the Cubans and Spain. Hearst and Pulitzer did all they could to fan the flames, at times resorting to "fake news." According to the Office of Historian of the US Department of State: "Once the term (yellow journalism) had been coined, it extended to the sensationalist style employed by the two publishers in their profit-driven coverage of world events, particularly developments in Cuba. Cuba had long been a Spanish colony and the revolutionary movement, which had been simmering on and off there for much of the 19th century, intensified during the 1890s. Many in the United States called upon Spain to withdraw from the island, and some even gave material support to the Cuban revolutionaries. Hearst and Pulitzer devoted more and more attention to the Cuban struggle for independence, at times accentuating the harshness of Spanish rule or the nobility of the revolutionaries, and occasionally printing rousing stories that proved to be false. This sort of coverage, complete with bold headlines and creative drawings of events, sold a lot of papers for both publishers." (Emphasis mine).
Below is a cartoon from a magazine that was critical of the inflammatory reporting styles of the Journal and World.
President Grover Cleveland suspended visits to Cuba from the US Navy, which had been regularly scheduled up to that point, so as not to inflame the situation. Spain agreed to grant Cuba limited autonomy beginning Jan. 1, 1898 to diffuse the situation. Protests in Cuba, however, turned violent in January 12, 1898 as the offices of four newspapers in Havana were attacked. The United States felt a need to protect it's citizens and interests in Cuba by sending the Maine, but did not want to appear to have hostile intentions. Spain and the United States negotiated an agreement whereby the Maine would steam to Havana on the condition that Spain's Vizcaya would also steam to New York to demonstrate that Spain and the United States remained at peace.
The United States let the situation calm in Cuba before President William McKinley ordered the USS Maine to Havana. It arrived January 25.
The USS Maine mysteriously exploded on the night of Feb. 15, killing 260 crew members. Most died immediately, but others slowly burned to death. US State Department: "Sober observers and an initial report by the colonial government of Cuba concluded that the explosion had occurred on board, but Hearst and Pulitzer, who had for several years been selling papers by fanning anti-Spanish public opinion in the United States, published rumors of plots to sink the ship. When a U.S. naval investigation later stated that the explosion had come from a mine in the harbor, the proponents of yellow journalism seized upon it and called for war."
February 17, 1898: Hearst's New York Journal claimed the explosion was the work of an enemy.
March 28, 1898. "The U.S. Navy conducted an investigation and on March 28, concluded that a mine had destroyed the Maine, and though the report could not assign responsibility, it was presumed that it was carried out by the Spanish. On April 11, McKinley asked Congress for permission to send troops to Cuba. Two weeks later, Congress declared war."
It would have been easy to mine the ship from the outside or start a coal fire from within either one, both of which would have ignited the powder aboard causing the massive explosion. The question is who to blame, as it was almost certainly intentional. Task and purpose says that 117 Years Later, The Sinking Of The USS Maine Remains A Mystery. You can read more there.
On April 25, 1898, Congress declared War with Spain.
July 1, 1898. Task and Purpose writes: "The Spanish-American War lasted 10 weeks with much of the action taking place on the island of Cuba, the most famous battle happening on July 1. Col. Teddy Roosevelt, who resigned his post as assistant secretary to the Navy, led the 1st United States Volunteer Cavalry, aka the “Rough Riders,” to the Battle of San Juan Hill; a bloody struggle to the gain high ground above enemy naval concentrations in the harbor of nearby Santiago de Cuba. The action cost the Fifth Army Corps over 1,000 soldiers — nearly five times as many as the Spanish, but despite the grave loss of life, Roosevelt, who carried a pistol into battle recovered from the Maine, overtook the enemy position and carried the day. Two days later, the Spanish fleet was destroyed, leading to surrender of the city on July 17."
December 10, 1898. Task and Purpose: "The Treaty of Paris... favored the United States. The U.S. emerged as a power player on the international stage and was portrayed as a defender of democracy. The treaty ensured the U.S. gained all of Spain’s territories outside Africa, including the Philippines, Guam, and Puerto Rico."
Newscenter Maine also calls the sinking of the USS Maine "a great mystery of American History." Newscenter Maine reported that the United States towed the Maine out to deep water in 1912.
Ben Proctor comments on how the influence of William Randolph Hearst grew enormously after the Spanish-American War: "He was a towering figure in late 19th and early 20th century. He was an individual that shaped both American domestic and foreign policies, at least--from the late 1890s to the early 19 teens, at least. He was an individual who, he thought, was responsible for the Spanish-American War. If he wasn't responsible, he helped mold public opinion in that way, in that direction, for the United States to intervene in behalf of justice and freedom for the Cubans. He was an individual who was a true progressive and would advocate many, many reforms that would come about in the early 1900s. But I think as much as anything, he was the foremost communicator of his day, in this book that I have written that goes to 1910. He has eight newspapers in the five largest cities in this country, three million readers. And since there was no radio, since there was no television--radio in 1920 and I think television first in 1939, but really after World War II--his effect upon the American policies and the American way of life were tremendous." Ben Proctor C-SPAN
1900. Below is a cartoon from a magazine critical of Hearst and Pulitzer, with the "long arm of the Law" holding them during a "cleansing of New York."
Willimam Randolph Hearst began a career in politics as a Democrat.
1902. "He ran the first time in 1902. He ran in 1902 for Congress. He ran two terms. He served in the 58th and 59th Congresses. He then decided he would run for president, and in 1904, he came in second--he was a Democrat, and he came in second in the Democratic process for nomination for president. Alton B. Parker of New York defeated him. He then decided that he wanted to be--he really wanted to be president of the United States. Hearst was a type of individual that never wanted to be second in anything. He wanted to excel. And he decided, therefore, that he really wanted to be governor. He tried to manipulate, in certain ways, to get somebody else to run for mayor of New York, but then he decided to run for mayor in 1905; was defeated. Then in 1906, he did run for governor against Charles Evans Hughes and was defeated. ... By 57,000 votes by Hughes. And in 1905 for mayor, it was--well, it was called the stolen election. He fought against Tammany Hall, the great Democratic organization in New York--boss organization in New York. And the action--it was called a stolen election. He was defeated by some 3,400 votes out of over 1/2 million cast. And they later would try to check on--or have a recount, but there were 101 boxes where there were more ballots cast than there were voters registered, and so the courts finally said, We can't have all this recounted.' But he gained tremendous fame from being the uncrowned mayor of New York in '05. Then he ran for governor in '06; defeated, 57,000. He would then run again in 1909 for mayor and then--against a man by the name of Gaynor, and he came in third. And that was his last real election where he headed a ticket. He would run again in 1910, one time for lieutenant governor. But he didn't --that's the only time he did not campaign, and he was defeated there." Ben Proctor C-SPAN
WORLD WAR 1 ERA
This section could become very large. I have provided a fair coverage of events, but I don't want to overwhelm the reader. William Hearst hired Karl Henry von Weigand in 1917. Weigand was a German-born man who interviewed Benito Mussolini and Adolph Hitler in their earliest days in politics. I'll explain a bit of the globalists who coordinated and created the War for their benefit.
The Rothschilds coordinated owners of industry, finance, and media in the United States, Germany, Britain, and France before they intentionally started the War. I strongly recommend that everyone buy and read Creature from Jekyll Isand. I'll provide some pages from it. If it sells some books for him, perhaps E. W. Griffin won't mind.
December 23, 1913. Federal Reserve is created “with the enactment of the Federal Reserve Act, after a series of financial panics (particularly the panic of 1907) led to the desire for central control of the monetary system in order to alleviate financial crises." It was necessary for the globalists to create the Federal Reserve before World War 1 in order to force the taxpayer to pay the globalists by the issuance of debt.
August 1, 1914. Germany declares War on Russia.
August 3, 1914. Germany declares War on France.
August 4, 1914. Britain declares War on Germany.
After War broke out in Europe, many American newspapers adopted a position that War was good for the economy.
1914. "In 1914 big-city newspapers across the country quickly coalesced around the viewpoint that, even if the war represented a terrible human tragedy, it also presented a great economic opportunity. In the words of the Chicago Tribune, “War May Bring Big Boom to US: Exporters, Shippers, Farmers and Clothes Makers Face Windfall,”[12] as well as to assert a dominant position in South American markets as European competitors ceded ground. A survey of twenty four papers sampled from across the United States in August 1914 found that sixteen – including the New York American, the most widely-read paper in the country with a circulation of 739, 844 in 1914,[13] as well as the New York Tribune, the Chicago Tribune, the Chicago Herald, the Philadelphia Record, the Philadelphia Evening News, the St Louis Globe-Democrat, the St Louis Republic, the Boston Globe, the Boston Herald, the Baltimore Sun, the San Francisco Examiner, the Cincinnati Enquirer, the Washington Post and the Los Angeles Times – all focused on the war’s unique commercial opportunities." Encyclopedia 1914-1918.
January 1915. In the United States, the House of Morgan, as a partner of Rothschilds, signs contract to supply British Army Council and Admiralty. The first contract was horses for $15 million. Total purchases rose to $3 Billion. Morgan also acted as purchasing agent for France, Russia, Italy, Canada. Then J.P. Morgan purchased all media in the United States. (Griffin, 236-237).
Until the period before the Federal Reserve was created, J.D. Rockefeller and J.P. Morgan were unfriendly competitors. Rockefeller was about to run Morgan out of business, but the Rothschilds stepped in to make peace and divide them both a piece of a much larger pie that was to be created by the war. Morgan got finance and media. Rockefeller got medicine (to become pharma), industry, oil, etc. The DuPonts got a share. Read the book, the Creature from Jekyll Island.
One of the better articles on the Rothschild's is anonymously written on Wordpress: "In this war, the German Rothschilds loan money to the Germans, the British Rothschilds loan money to the British, and the French Rothschilds loan money to the French." "Futhermore, the Rothschilds have control of the three European news agencies, Wolff (est. 1849) in Germany, Reuters (est. 1851) in England, and Havas (est. 1835) in France."
The Rothschilds, via J.P. Morgan, were about to gain the media in the United States as well, as reported by U.S. Congressman Oscar Callaway, of Texas.
March 1915. House of Morgan purchases control of media in the United States. On February 9, 1917, U.S. Congressman Oscar Callaway informed Congress that J. P. Morgan taken control of the American media industry. “In March, 1915, the J.P. Morgan interests, the steel, shipbuilding, and powder interests, and their subsidiary organizations, got together 12 men high up in the newspaper world and employed them to select the most influential newspapers in the United States and sufficient number of them to control generally the policy of the daily press of the United States. These 12 men worked the problem out by selecting 179 newspapers, and then began, by an elimination process, to retain only those necessary for controlling the general policy of the daily press throughout the country. They found it was only necessary to purchase the control of 25 of the greatest papers. The 25 papers were agreed upon; emissaries were sent to purchase the policy, national and international, of these papers; an agreement was reached; the policy of the papers was bought, to be paid for by the month; an editor was furnished for each paper to properly supervise and edit information regarding the questions of preparedness, militarism, financial policies and other things of national and international nature considered vital to the interests of the purchasers.” Congressional Records, February 9, 1917 Vol. 54, Part 3, Pages 2947-2948
Sometime in 1915, war journalist Karl von Weigand moved from the Associated Press to Pulitzer's New York World. Hearst would later hire him away from Pulitzer in 1917. Weigand was a German-American who had access to foreign leaders such as Germany's Kaiser Wilhelm, who Weigand interviewed November 20, 1914.
April 22, 1915. The Lusitania, a British passenger ocean liner, was well-known to transport arms from the United States to Europe. On the voyage where it was sunk, the Lusitania contained war supplies purchased by J.P. Morgan and bound from New York to Britain (Creature from Jekyll Island 249-250). The State Department of Germany attempted to publish warnings in 50 east coast newspapers in the United States essentially warning of that vessels like the Lusitania were considered by Germany to be eligible targets of war, and not to sail aboard the Lusitania. Most of these newspapers did not publish Germany's warning. A newspaper in Des Moines published anyway.
May 7, 1915. The RMS Lusitania is sunk by a German submarine. 1,198 of the 1,962 aboard lost their lives. 128 were Americans. William Churchill made sure to make no effort to interfere with the sinking, which he knew was very likely to happen. British intelligence had been tracking the German submarine. They directed the Lusitania directly into its path.
The Lusitania sank off the coast of Ireland. The Irish were left to deal with the survivors and the dead. Irish Central writes: "At the same time as Lusitania was approaching Ireland, several destroyers were being used to protect the pride of the British navy, the battleship Orion, which had just left port. Other destroyers that could have protected the Lusitania were tied up in British and Irish ports. Given all that Room 20 (British knew about submarine activity in the area at the time, the Lusitania should have been diverted to the safer North Channel route (around the top of Ireland). It also should have been given a naval escort as it approached from the Atlantic. Neither was done and this looks very suspicious, given earlier remarks made by Churchill implying that it would take a major disaster to get America into the war. The sinking of the Lusitania, with many Americans on board, provided such a disaster. If the sinking of the Lusitania was, as it appears, a result of deliberate and calculated inaction by Churchill, it surely must rank among the greatest sins of omission ever committed."
Lusitania.net reports: "Room 40 at Admiralty House, London, was the hub of British Naval Intelligence. Tracking German Navy units was one of the main efforts of Room 40. ... One particular German U boat, U20, under the command of Kapitan-Leutnant Schwieger, was causing concern to those gathered in the war room. She was known to be on her way toward Fastnet. Ever since she’d left her base, U20 had been giving her position to the German Admiralty by Wireless Telegraphy every 4 hours. Unbeknownst to her commander, U20’s messages were being intercepted and deciphered immediately by the Room 40 intelligence team. In fact, U20 had her own ledger at Room 40. That ledger is now in the National Archives at Kew, London. It is part of the ADM137 series. (The files ADM137/4152 are the U-boat history sheets compiled by Lt.Cdr. Tiarks). Below is page 4 of U20’s Room 40 ledger from those files. It clearly shows that the British Admiralty had intercepted and decoded EVERY message and sinking report from U20, right up to the sinking of the Lusitania. (In fact page 5 follows U20’s voyage home afterwards, via her intercepted messages). It also clearly proves that those in charge at the Admiralty were FULLY INFORMED of U20’s activities throughout her patrol."
This is the account from E.W. Griffin, the Creature from Jekyll Island.
The event was apparently coordinated to bring the United States into World War 1, but there was considerable pushback in the United States. US Secretary of State William Jennings Bryan resigned over efforts to drum up a war over the issue, saying the United States knew it was a military target. Churchill would later say of President Woodrow Wilson: “What he did in April 1917 could have been done in May 1915."
March 1916, Woodrow Wilson enters secret agreement to enter war on behalf of allies. (Griffin, page 241).
Fall 1916. US Government begins making huge purchases in preparation for war. Wilson contacts the head of Rockfeller’s bank, for appointments in purchasing. (Griffin, page 259).
(As a footnote of history, one of the appointments in war purchasing was Harry Anslinger, who would go on to the Bureau of Narcotics, and wage a fierce anti-marijuana (anti-medicine) campaign. By my estimation Anslinger began trafficking drugs with war ships from Europe to the United States in this era).
January 13, 1917. William Randolph Hearst brags on the the San Francisco Examiner that they had hired Karl Henry von Wiegand, the "War's best reporter."
January 30, 1917. Germany announced a policy of unrestricted submarine warfare.
March 15, 1917. The America Ambassador to to Britain, Walter Page, sent a telegram to the State Department of the United States that it had become beyond ability of JP Morgan to finance France and Britain further. Because the United States was neutral in the War, it could not pay J.P. Morgan for his debt incurred unless there was a Declaration of War from the United States. Germany had won the War against Britain by this point with their submarine blockade. People in the United States considered further financing of J.P. Morgan and Britain to be a lost cause. J.P. Morgan had run up so much debt that he would never be able to repay it without a bailout.
April 6, 1917. The United States declares war on Germany.
April 24, 1917. War Loan Act extends $1 Billion to Allies. $200 went immediately to Britain, $100 to France; they both paid J.P. Morgan.
1919. "In 1919, William Randolph Hearst inherited $25 million from his mother, Phoebe Apperson Hearst. This fortune appears to have fueled his newspaper buying program over the following decade. By 1930,Hearst owned 28 newspapers, so widespread that one of every four Americans read a Hearst paper. He also established a news reel company and began acquiring radio stations."
October 31, 1919. Last of the US troops return from Europe. In the period January 1, 1916 to July 1921, when war expenditures ceased, net corporate profits in the United States were $35,413,000,000. In the war period April 17, 1917 to October 31, 1919, war expenses were $38,000,000,000. (Griffin, page 259).
ERA between WW1 and WW2
December 13, 1922. "On 12/13 November 1922, the Hearst newspapers published the first interview with (Adolph Hitler), the “German Mussolini." The interview was conducted by Karl Henry von Weigand, Hearst employee. Oxford: "Shortly after Benito Mussolini’s rise to power in October 1922, von Wiegand cabled back to the United States the first English-language story and interview of Hitler. In the tradition of sensational interviewing, von Wiegand profiled the thirty-three year old ‘man of the people’ and former ‘master builder’ (an exaggeration of Hitler’s dabbling in carpentry) in vivid detail. Although the Nazis had little more than 7,000 formal members around this time and would not gain any significant political power for nearly a decade, von Wiegand claimed that the ‘German Mussolini’ had 200,000 followers and warned that the ‘shadow of the Fascisti’ was rising in Munich." The image is hard to read but it's the only one I can find. I can't find the date of Weigand's interview of Mussolini either.
von Weigand: "The real German Fascisti are the national socialists and their Mussolini is Adolph Hitler, a man of the people, a private soldier during the war, a carpenter by trade, a magnetic speaker, having also exceptional organizing genius."
September 16, 1923. Von Weigand reports that "Stage Set for German Revolution."
1924. In 1924, (Hearst) opened the New York Daily Mirror, a tabloid frankly imitating the New York Daily News. Among his other holdings were two news services, Universal News and International News Service; King Features Syndicate; a film company, Cosmopolitan Productions; extensive New York City real estate; and thousands of acres of land in California and Mexico, along with timber and mining interests. New World Cyclopedia
1925. By 1925 Hearst had established or acquired newspapers in every section of the United States, as well as several magazines. Britannica
In 1925, Adolph Hitler published the first edition of Mein Kampf.
1920s. PBS: "In the 1920's, Hearst's power is extreme. He would force Presidents and heads of state to deal with him as if he was a Secretary of State. Hearst totally changed the nature of the newspaper. He brought the marketing, the hype, the sensationalism. Previously newspapers were dull as dishwater. For Hearst, news was not reporting facts. News was creating history. He would tell his reporters: visualize the news before you write it. And he was pretty shameless about it."
Late 1920s to early 1930s. Oxford: "Throughout the late 1920s and early 1930s, a panoply of fascists, including Hitler and Mussolini, found their way, often through von Wiegand’s assistance, to Hearst’s payroll as celebrity correspondents for the feature sections of his papers.56 "
December 1928 - October 1934. An image of 35 types articles written by Benito Mussolini printed for press in the United States, including Hearst's newspapers.
August 1932, von Weigand wrote: "The two would meet again periodically over the years as Hitler consolidated his power. In an August 1932 piece, von Wiegand would write: I have known Hitler for 10 or 11 years. I never had any difficulty in seeing him when I wanted to. On a number of occasions he has called on me to have a chat. We have lunched and dine together, especially in the early years of his tireless campaign to “save Germany.” WW2 on deadline
October 2, 1932. Hearst's San Francisco Examiner publishes Benito Mussolini "B. Mussolini, ‘Duce reviews ten years of fascist rule’, San Francisco Examiner, 2 Oct. 1932, p. 1." This reporting was apparently coordinated by von Weigand.
On January 4, 1933, Americans representing the Rothschilds meet with Hitler. John Foster and Allen Dulles met in secret with Adolph Hitler in Germany. (Nazi Hydra, page 50). The Dulles brothers were representing Kuhn, Loeb, and Company, an investment bank of the Rothschilds. Joseph Goebbels recorded the results of the meeting in a dairy entry the next day: "If this coup succeeds, we are not far from power... Our finances have suddenly improved.” On this day it was decided in Germany that President Hindenburg would appoint Adolph Hitler to be Chancellor of Germany. Note that the Rothschilds changed their name from Bauer in 1743. These may be the "Bayers" of IG Farben in Germany who poisoned the Jews with hydrogen cyanide (Zyklon B. Note that Nazi Hydra is another history book that should be taught in school along with Creature from Jekyll Island.
Adolph Hitler's grandfather was likely Baron Anselm Salomon von Rothschild of Vienna, Austria. People know about the "Big Lie" theory of Hitler and Goebbels, but would be hard-pressed to describe what the big lie was that they told. Hitler said that "Jews (Rothschilds) prevented Germany from winning World War 1.” He was correct. Hitler didn't tell the people of Germany that he was one of them, however. He stoked the flames of Germany’s to kill Jews and Germans alike. The globalists don't care who dies, as long as it isn't them, and they gain power and wealth. It’s the same with every war, along the way they control and use “Science” and disinformation against mankind.
January 30, 1933. Germany's President Hindenburg appoints Adolph Hitler Chancellor of Germany. Hitler called for new elections.
On February 27, 1933, Hitler's supporters set fire to the Reichstag, Germany's Parliament building. There were three major political parties in Germany at the time: The National Socialist Party, the Communists, and the Social Democrats. The Communists were blamed for the fire. Spartacus Educational writes: "a young man from the Netherlands, Marianus van der Lubbe, was eventually executed for the crime. As a teenager Lubbe had been a communist and Hermann Goering used this information to claim that the Reichstag Fire was part of a KPD plot to overthrow the government. Hitler gave orders that all leaders of the German Communist Party should "be hanged that very night." Paul von Hindenburg vetoed this decision but did agree that Hitler should take "dictatorial powers". KPD candidates in the election were arrested and Hermann Goering announced that the Nazi Party planned "to exterminate" German communists. Thousands of members of the Social Democrat Party and Communist Party were arrested and sent to recently opened to concentration camps."
February 28, 1933. President Hindenburg issues a "Decree for the Protection of the People and the State" which came to be known as the Reichstag Fire Decree. US Holocaust Memorial Museum translation:
In virtue of Article 48(2) of the German Constitution, the following is decreed as a defensive measure against communist acts of violence endangering the state: Article 1: Sections 114, 115, 117, 118, 123, 124, and 153 of the Constitution of the German Reich are suspended until further notice. Therefore, restrictions on personal liberty, on the right of free expression of opinion, including freedom of the press, on the right of assembly and the right of association, and violations of the privacy of postal, telegraphic, and telephonic communications, warrants for house searches, orders for confiscations, as well as restrictions on property, are also permissible beyond the legal limits otherwise prescribed."
March 21, 1933. Germany reopened their Reichstag in Potsdam at garnisonkirche, or Garrison Church. On this day konzentrationslager, Dachau concentration camp, was opened and intended to hold political prisoners.
March 23, 1933. US Holocaust Museum: Since the passage of this law depended upon a two-thirds majority vote in parliament, Hitler and the Nazi Party used intimidation and persecution to ensure the outcome they desired. They prevented all 81 Communists and 26 of the 120 Social Democrats from taking their seats, detaining them in so-called protective detention in Nazi-controlled camps. In addition, they stationed SA and SS members in the chamber to intimidate the remaining representatives and guarantee their compliance. In the end, the law passed with more than the required two-thirds majority, with only Social Democrats voting against it.
The Enabling Act was based on “temporary” Emergency powers.
March 29, 1933. Detroit Free Press reports "Jews Murdered Every Day."
1934. Sometime in1934, von Wiegand traveled to Germany to interview Adolph Hitler again. "Hearst didn’t help his declining reputation when, in 1934, he visited Berlin and interviewed Adolf Hitler, helping to legitimize Hitler’s leadership in Germany." Biography
September 1934. George Seldes, an anti-fascist writer reported that William Randolph Hearst traveled to Germany to meet Hitler and made an arrangement with him for favorable reporting in the United States to counter his well-deserved reputation as a sadistic and dangerous dictator, much like the way Hearst Corporation and Houston Chronicle today attempt to counter with their reporting the horrible reputation of the deadly pharmaceutical industry and their deadly and counter-effective COVID-19 vaccines.
"[When] Hearst came to take the waters at Bad Nauheim [Germany] in September 1934…Hitler sent two of his most trusted Nazi propagandists…to ask Hearst how Nazism could present a better image in the U.S. When Hearst went to Berlin later in the month, he was taken to see Hitler.” “Promptly after this visit with Adolf Hitler and the making of said arrangements... plaintiff, William Randolph Hearst, instructed all Hearst press correspondents in Germany, including those of INS (Hearst's International News Service) to report happenings in Germany only in a friendly manner. All of correspondents reporting happenings in Germany accurately and without friendliness, sympathy and bias for the actions of the German government, were transferred elsewhere, discharged, or forced to resign."
Seldes reports that a $400,000 a year deal was struck between Hearst and Hitler, and signed by Doctor Joseph Goebbels, the Nazi propaganda minister. "Hearst," continues Seldes, "completely changed the editorial policy of his nineteen daily newspapers the same month he got the money."
July 1935. Oxford: "‘Hell Karl, where out of the big world have you come from now?’ United States president Franklin D. Roosevelt (F.D.R.) greeted Karl H. von Wiegand, the ‘Dean of Foreign Correspondents’, on a ‘dreadfully hot’ summer’s day in July 1935.1".
August 1, 1936. William Randolph Hearst attends a speech by Mussolini in Rome, but Mussolini does not meet with Hearst. Mussolini wrote an apology letter to Hearst.
In May 1940, Germany began an offensive that pushed into France. America was becoming nervous about Hitler's intentions. Karl von Wiegand traveled to Berlin and interviewed Adolph Hitler at his headquarters to create a story to calm Americans. Hitler told him "America for Americans, Europe for Europeans." Below: “Von Wiegand (left) with Nazi officials on the balcony of the Crillon Hotel in Paris, a few hours after the Germans invaded the French capital.”
June 11, 1940. Karl von Wiegand, employed by Hearst, interviews Adolph Hitler in the "Führer's" Headquarters, June 11, 1940. Karl von Wiegand sent to his assistant where he describes his interview with Hitler on June 11, 1940. The headline was apparently "America for American's, Europe for Europeans" in some of Hearst's newspapers. Hoover
Notes von Weigand took from his interview with Hitler in June 1940.
June 15, 1940. Excerpt from the article of von Weigand from his interview of Hitler.
Image below is Hitler in Paris June 23, 1940.
December 7, 1941. Japan's attack on the US Navy anchored at Pearl Harbour draws the United States into World War II.
1945, Sometime. Adolph Hitler de-boards submarine off the coast of Argentina with a group of around 50 others. Pack horses were waiting for them and took them all into the Andes. The movie Grey Wolf documents his life there. 3 pairs of body doubles of Adolph Hitler and Eva Braun were killed. The last on April 30, 1945 were doused with gasoline and burned.
And that's enough of a timeline I think.
1987. The Houston Chronicle, one of the largest newspapers in the United States, was founded in 1901 and was acquired by Hearst in 1987. Houston Chronicle "The Chronicle is the flagship publication of Hearst Newspapers, which publishes 24 dailies and 52 weeklies and employs more than 2,600 journalists and staff nationally. Hearst’s newspapers include the San Francisco Chronicle, the Times Union and the San Antonio Express-News."
October -November 2019. A picture has been painted that the Communists leaked or spilled a manmade coronavirus nearby Wuhan Institute of Virology.
December 2020. People begin lining up to take poison.
November 12, 2021. Houston Chronicle reports the successful treatments of over 2,000 COVID-19 patients by Dr. Mary Bowden as "misinformation."
END
Charles Wright