Much of what we call Cancer appears to be a Symbiotic Relationship between Bacteria and diseased cells which can be cured with Ivermectin, Lactoferrin, Fenbendazole and so on.

I think there's more than enough scientific evidence to pursue this theory

Much of what is described as "cancer" appears to be a symbiotic relationship between diseased cells and bacteria, whereby diseased cells provide nourishment for the bacteria, and the bacteria protect the diseased cells from the body's systems that eliminate diseased cells by forming a "biofilm" shield.

I would like to acknowledge A. M. Gonzalez and members of the Viber Group "A Prostate Community Trial" as being my first source of information on this theory. I've selected several studies and articles that I have read which have reinforced my opinion.

As with bacteria shielding cancer cells, the truth of the nature of cancer appears to have been shielded from the public by the fascist alliance of pharmaceutical companies, government regulatory agencies, and corporate media.

By targeting bacteria with medicine, some cancers can be reduced or eliminated. Ivermectin, Lactoferrin, and Fenbendazole appear to be effective against cancer in some cases by killing bacteria that shield cancer cells.

Lactoferrin kills Gram-negative bacteria, according to several studies. Gram-negative bacteria are a nasty group of bacteria that are more resistant to antibiotics. The CDC says:

"Gram-negative bacteria cause infections including pneumonia, bloodstream infections, wound or surgical site infections, and meningitis in healthcare settings. Gram-negative bacteria are resistant to multiple drugs and are increasingly resistant to most available antibiotics. These bacteria have built-in abilities to find new ways to be resistant and can pass along genetic materials that allow other bacteria to become drug-resistant as well."

Here's a study that says Lactoferrin inhibits tumors, but doesn't mention bacteria.

Bezault et al Human lactoferrin inhibits growth of solid tumors and development of experimental metastases in mice (1994). "The antitumor effects of the multifunctional iron-binding glycoprotein, lactoferrin (Lf), were investigated. Lf inhibited growth in mice of transplantable solid tumors induced by v-ras transformed fibroblasts and a methylcholanthrene-induced fibrosarcoma. Lf also substantially reduced lung colonization (experimental metastasis) by B16-F10 melanoma cells in syngeneic mice. Iron-saturated and apo-Lf exhibited comparable levels of tumor inhibition and antimetastatic activity. Transferrin, a related iron-binding protein, had no effect on lung colonization. In the B16-F10 system, elimination of natural killer cell activity by pretreatment of mice with anti-asialo GM1 antibody abrogated the effects of Lf, whereas inhibition of macrophage function with silica did not. The results demonstrate a novel activity for Lf and suggest a potentially important role for this molecule in the primary defense against tumorigenesis."

The contribution of Oscar Aguilera in describing the bioshield and how Lactoferrin can penetrate it is quite important.

Oscar Aguilera et al (2003) Transferrins selectively cause ion efflux through bacterial and artificial membranes. "Serum transferrin, ovotransferrin and lactoferrin constitute the most notable members of the transferrin family. Among their multiple biological functions, they possess an important antibacterial activity. These proteins can permeate the Escherichia coli outer membrane, reaching the inner membrane where they selectively cause permeation of ions, resulting in dissipation of the electrical potential without affecting the pH gradient."

Here's a good study on how Bacteria promotes Lung Cancer.

Maosong Yi et al (2016): Gram-negative bacteria facilitate tumor outgrowth and metastasis by promoting lipid synthesis in lung cancer patients.

"Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Patients with lung cancer are very frequently present with pulmonary infections, in particular with Gram-negative bacteria."

"Gram-negative bacteria significantly promoted lung cancer development including growth and metastasis in dose dependent manner. Mechanistically, Gram-negative bacteria activate TLR4 and TLR9 signaling and enhance lipid synthesis in human lung cancer cells."

Dr. Jeffrey Dach summarized a presentation of Dr. Nooshin Darvish on how the bacteria responsible for Lyme Disease was also present in tumors. This article is a must read because Dr. Dach went way back to 1890 to research the relationship between cancer and bacteria. This isn't some new theory. Not even close. With hundreds of billions of dollars spent annually on “cancer research,” it all appears to be a big scam. In any case, why not pursue a cheap cures that are reported to work by doctors and that the clearly failed cancer research industry refuses to consider? Isn’t it worth a try?

Jeffrey Dach, 2016. Cancer as a Parasitic Disease.

"I was intrigued by a presentation by Dr Nooshin Darvish, of five cases of Glioblastoma Multiforme treated over ten years in her Holistique clinic located in Bellevue, Washington.   All five tumor biopsy samples stained positive for the spirochete parasite,Borrelia, the organism found in Lyme disease.(1)   The patient’s tumors regressed upon treatment for parasitic disease, and progressed when treatments were halted.  The pathology report by Alan MacDonald, M.D.,can be seen here:"  Glioblastoma Five cases positive for Borrelia FISH Probes Alan MacDonald Darvish

On December 3, 1890 the Scottish pathologist William Russell reported a “cancer microbe” seen under his microscope inside cancer cells. His report in the Dec 18, 1890 British Medical Journal included detailed drawings describing parasitic spores within cancer cells.(24)  Over the next 120 years, Dr Russell’s hypothesis that cancer is a parasitic disease was picked up and championed by a long list of impressive scientists.(80)  However all were labeled as medical heretics and lived out their careers in obscurity.  Left Image: Microsporidian spore courtesy of wikimedia. This organism is a spore-forming unicellular parasite, once thought to be protozoans, now known to be fungi.

August 2019. Case Study: Joe Tippins was diagnosed with small cell lung cancer in September 2016 with a tumor the size of his fist in his lower left lung and in his lymph nodes. He went to MD Anderson in Houston who used radiation and chemotherapy. The radiation caused harm to him. He lost weight from 200 pounds to 105, and lost all his hair. The radiation and chemotherapy worked to an extent. The tumor disappeared, but the cancer metasticized throughout his body. A veterinarian in Oklahoma, a family friend, informed Tippins about a scientist from Merck who had been creating cancer in mice for studies. Her mice became infested with intestinal parasites. She gave the mice Fenbendazole to kill the intestinal parasites. The Fenbendazole also cured all the cancer in her mice. The scientist came to be diagnosed with cancer herself. She took Fenbendazole and cured her cancer. Tippens began taking Fenbendazole 3 days a week at a dosage recommended by his veterinarian friend: 1.2 grams of Fenbendazole per day, 3 days a week. Tippens did that for January, February, March and April of 2017. By May of 2017, Tippens was free of cancer.

I came upon the video of Joe Tippens after reading the articles: Unusual Cancer Treatment and Protocol and The Cancer/Parasite Connection and Treatments Including Detox.

2021: Case Study, Aisha de la Cruz. One of the inspirations for the Ivermectin/Lactoferrin community trials on Viber. (If someone knows how to embed a Rumble video into Substack, please let me know).

https://rumble.com/v1dmhsp-cdc-ph-weekly-huddle-july-23-2022-snippet-doctors-share-findings-from-outre.html

Dr. Aisha de la Cruz: He (Dr. Allan Landrito) found out that I had cancer at that time. I had gall bladder carcinoma. And he introduced to me the Ivermectin. I’m having chemo at that time. I tried. The good thing is I stopped all my chemo and radiation because of Ivermectin. Yeah I stopped. I was supposed to have 8 sessions, and I stopped on the 6th. That was during the Pandemic, 2021. I’m still taking Ivermectin up til now. During my chemo I’m taking 8 capsules daily for 4 months. 15 milligrams.

Dr. Marivik Villa: So basically 2.4 milligrams per kilo. 2.4. The highest I’ve given on acute COVID, was like, well 2. 2.4 for 8 months?

Dr. Aisha de la Cruz: For 4 months. Because I feel better now. Then after that 6 (15 mg capsules) for 2 months. Then 4 (15 mg capsules) for 2 months again.

From A. M. Gonzalez:

Dr. Aisha de la Cruz took 2.4mg daily for each kilo of her body's weight for 4 months and continued with 1/2 of this 8 months later. With no side effects, Dr. De La Cruz's fist sized tumor in her gall bladder disappeared after one year of Ivermectin. She started Ivermectin because she quit the chemo that did not work.

Here's an important recent study on how Ivermectin makes "cold" tumors "hot." That means that killer T-cells can penetrate into the tumor.

March 02, 2021. Dobrin Draganov et al, Ivermectin converts cold tumors hot and synergizes with immune checkpoint blockade for treatment of breast cancer.

We show that treatment with the FDA-approved anti-parasitic drug ivermectin induces immunogenic cancer cell death (ICD) and robust T cell infiltration into breast tumors.

Checkpoint blockade^1,2 has emerged as a revolutionary approach that harnesses a patient’s own immune system to treat cancer. However, checkpoint inhibitors as single agents are only effective in a subset of patients and cancer types². Recent studies suggest that efficacy of checkpoint inhibitors is primarily limited to cancers already infiltrated by T cells—often termed “hot” tumors. In contrast, “cold” tumors have little to no T cell infiltration and generally do not respond to checkpoint blockade.

So that's where we are today. (I could use some better scientific references on the "bioshield" theory, if anyone knows of any, which I have mainly heard in conversations in the Viber group).

Charles Wright