Arizona Senator Janae Shamp held a hearing on Hospital Protocols at an ironically-titled Novel Coronavirus Southwestern Intergovernmental Committee on Friday, March 15, 2024.
This article constitutes an open letter to Senator Shamp on the false narrative presented to her Committee by Peter McCullough, and the conflicting financial interests of McCullough which may have prevented him from telling “the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth” to the Arizona State Senators.
Senator Shamp opened the hearing with a moment of silence for a friend who was killed by Hospital Protocols.
Senator Shamp: “I think most people know me around here as the nurse who was fired for not getting the vaccination. But today I am also a friend of someone who recently died from the ongoing COVID-19 Hospital Protocols that I was told last year were not being utilized anymore.”
“I would like to do a moment of silence for my dear friend and all of the COVID-19 Hospital Protocol victims.”
“Hospitals across America continue to medically gaslight and ignore the evidence presented through various congressional and state-led hearings. This astonishingly flippant attitude has prioritized expensive drugs like Remdesivir while banning more effective and less costly treatments.”
Senator Shamp, I would like to make you aware of the financial conflicts of interest of Peter McCullough. I will also point out some issues that I have with Mr. McCullough’s testimony.
Between 2016-2022, Mr. McCullough received payments from numerous phamaceutical companies including Sanofi Us Services Inc., Astrazeneca Uk Limited, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim International Gmbh, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Amarin Pharma Inc., Novo Nordisk Inc., Merck, Sharp & Dohme Llc, GE Healthcare, Amgen Inc., Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. and others. (5)
The payments to Mr. McCullough from Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals in particular represent a conflict of interest for Mr. McCullough in properly reporting the nature of deaths in hospitals.
In fiscal year 2022, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. was the highest bidder for Mr. McCullough’s services, described as either speaking or consulting services. (4). Also in 2022, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. made a large payment to Beth Israel Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02215. Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center was the second largest recepient of payments from Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc, behind the Hospital Of The Univ Of Penna. (5)
A large amount of their ventilated patients developed acute respiratory distress syndrome, or ARDS at Beth Israel Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center by March 2020. (7,8,9). Beth Israel Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center was killing their patients and collecting payments from the government via this method. Dr. McCullough has common funding source with Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc, and perhaps has a financial incentive to describe these deaths as “failures” instead of “homicides.”
Mr. McCullough and others closely associated with him have advanced a notion that “early treatment saves lives.” This is an extremely poor and incorrect interpretation of data. These statistics they quote compare mortality rates of people receiving “early treatments” such as Ivermectin to the death rates resulting from Hospital Protocols. These studies do NOT compare death rates of Ivermectin to death rates of “COVID.” You cannot call a death that results from giving a known deadly drug Remdesivir, loading them up with opioids, and ventilating them, causing bacterial pnueomonia, renal failure, along with denying these patients food, water, and basic hygeine a “COVID” death caused by a virus.
You cannot use these homicide rates to claim that “early treatments save lives” by comparison.
Every study that compares things that do not kill patients to Hospital Protocols that do kill patients, and interprets this data to read “these treatments could have saved lives” is based on an incorrect interpretation of data. I hope that you can accept this extremely simple statistical concept.
The next time someone says something saved lives by comparison, ask how those other people really died.
Early treatments such as Ivermectin do not kill patients, Hospitals and vaccines do. It’s that simple. COVID is not killing anyone, anywhere. Senator Shamp, I recommend that you call other expert witnesses to testify before your committee who will tell you the truth.
Dr. Michael Yeadon is now on record that there was never a viral “COVID” Pandemic. (6). Sasha Latypova has said that it is not possible to engineer viruses that spread person-to-person the manner in which the alleged virus was said to have spread. Drs. Mark and Sam Bailey have debunked the fraudulent and unscientific methods to create the in silico SARS-CoV-2 virus sequence, which the meaningless PCR tests tested for. (10). The SARS-CoV-2 is a fabrication, any way you want to look at it.
There are numerous medical uses of Ivermectin. The methods by which Ivermectin worked to save falsely-labeled “COVID” patients lives needs to be studied, although it seems clear that the antibiotic effects of Ivermectin were the main reason for the sharp reduction in mortality among hospitalized “COVID” patients.
Mary Talley Bowden reported that a high rate of hospitalized “COVID” patients survived after receiving Ivermectin under Court Order. All who were denied Ivermectin by a Court died. (2). These case studies should show how Ivermectin saved their lives.
ARDS, created by Beth Israel Medical Center and other ICUs across the country, is a blood clotting condition based on circulating endotoxin or bacteria (1). Ivermectin is likely beneficial in treating ventilator-induced ARDS. Recent studies have shown the extremely high rate of bacterial pneumonia in ventilated “COVID” patients. (3). Ivermectin would have worked to treat bacterial pneumonia.
Ivermectin works, but it works to reverse the damage caused by Hospitals, not “COVID.”
Mr. McCullough started his presentation with a false and fear-based narrative of an engineered virus that spread around the world.
8:00 McCoullough:
COVID-19 illness and the vaccine are very similar in that they expose patients to a protein on the surface of the virus, the spiculule if you will, the spine on the surface of the virus called the spike protein. This spike protein was intentionally engineered in a Chinese biosecurity lab in Wuhan China. The spike protein is not a natural protein. It’s been modified by mankind in a joint US-Chinese collaboration that took years to create SARS-CoV-2. It’s now fully acknowledged through the House Select Coronavirus Investigative Committee in Washington, that SARS-CoV-2 was created in the Chinese biosecurity lab in Wuhan China.
Mr. McCullough continued to call the use of Remdesivir a “failure” in response to the mythical SARS-CoV-2 virus. This goes along with McCullough’s larger notion that other “early treatments” would have worked better at fighting the mythical virus. The reality is that Remdesivir was part of a deadly Protocol that intentionally killed patients.
47:50 McCullough:
Well there are certainly manuscripts published from around the world regarding in-hospital outcomes and the use of Remdesivir. The one way to think about hospitalization is that someone dying of COVID-19 in the hospital is a failure. It’s a failure that the hospital was supposed to save lives. There shouldn’t have been a single death in the hospital. That should have been the demand from Americans. The observation that there were almost no deaths of people at home with COVID is startling. You’d think that if this was indeed truly an illness with a natural history and a fatal outcome there would be people dead at home. You would just think that’s the case. One cannot find manuscripts or reports of that in the United States because virtually all the deaths occurred in the hospitals. So the question on the table is, what occurred at the hospital that failed to save lives?
It is clearly illogical to state that hospitals “failed to save lives,” when you also know damned good and well that “there were almost no deaths of people at home,” as he also said. This is called mass homicide for renumeration, Senator Shamp, not “a failure.”
Hospitals were following Protocols subsidized by the government. For each positive (and meaningless) COVID-19 PCR test, for each dose of Remdesivir, each person ventilated, and for each person theykilled in there hospitals with “COVID” on the death certificate, Hospitals received compensation from the Federal Government.
Peter McCullough is receiving payments from pharmaceutical companies that also pay these Hospitals, Senator Shamp, and I respectfully submit this information for your consideration.
Charles Wright
REFERENCES
(1). Coagulation and inflammation in acute lung injury, Welty-Wolf et al, 2002.
(3). Machine learning links unresolving secondary pneumonia to mortality in patients with severe pneumonia, including COVID-19, Gao et al, 2023.
(4). Top Companies Making General Payments to Peter Andrew Mccullough in 2022
(5). Top Recipients Receiving General Payments from Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. in 2022
(6) Dr. Mike Yeadon: Introductory Statement About Serious Crimes
(7). New Treatment Approach Proposed for Respiratory Distress in COVID-19, Drug Topics, March 26, 2020.
(8). BIDMC launches clinical trial to assess common anti-clotting medication for treatment of COVID-19-related respiratory failure, April 06, 2020
(9). COVID-19: Could a clot-busting drug help save the lives of patients on ventilators? Medical News Today, April 11, 2020
(10). A Farewell To Virology – Part Two (Dr Mark Bailey and Steve Falconer)
"Thank you, Charles. I've often found myself asking a haunting question: why weren't we confronted with the stark reality of the pandemic—bodies lining the streets or being carried out of homes? Instead, the grim truth unfolded within the sterile confines of hospitals, where people entered seeking care but left in body bags.
My daughter and I walked into Northwell Health Glen Cove Hospital in New York, both healthy and full of hope. Yet, forty days later, my daughter emerged in a body bag, her once vibrant life extinguished by heart failure and multiple organ failure.
It's a chilling realization to comprehend that my daughter's life, her very existence, was reduced to a mere commodity, traded on the stocks of Wall Street. How did we reach a point where human lives are treated as profit margins in the corridors of our hospitals?
If this is the deplorable outcome of seeking treatment for a simple dry cough, then it's evident that these so-called hospitals have failed in their fundamental duty to heal and protect. They have become nothing more than chambers of commerce, prioritizing financial gain over human life.
The loss of my daughter has left an irrevocable void in my heart, but it has also ignited a fire within me to demand justice and accountability. No one should endure such a tragic fate within the walls of institutions meant to provide solace and healing.
It's time to confront the harsh reality of our healthcare system and demand sweeping reforms. If we fail to take action now, we risk condemning more innocent lives to the same fate. My daughter's memory deserves better than this, and I will not rest until her legacy sparks the change we so desperately need."