Pfizer responds to Project Veritas report of intentional "Directed Evolution" at Pfizer.

On January 25, 2023, Project Veritas published a video of Jordon Trishton Walker, Pfizer Director of Research and Development, Strategic Operations - mRNA Scientific Planner, who said:

“One of the things we're exploring is like, why don't we just mutate it [COVID] ourselves so we could create -- preemptively develop new vaccines, right? So, we have to do that. If we're gonna do that though, there's a risk of like, as you could imagine -- no one wants to be having a pharma company mutating f**king viruses.”

Pfizer responded on January 27:

“In the ongoing development of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, Pfizer has not conducted gain of function or directed evolution research.  Working with collaborators, we have conducted research where the original SARS-CoV-2 virus has been used to express the spike protein from new variants of concern. This work is undertaken once a new variant of concern has been identified by public health authorities. This research provides a way for us to rapidly assess the ability of an existing vaccine to induce antibodies that neutralize a newly identified variant of concern.”

So let’s break this down. First of all, what is being referred to when they say “directed evolution research.” The first thing that comes to my mind when I hear “Directed Evolution” is that pharma is directing the evolution of Homo sapiens by reverse transcription of diseases into human DNA with mRNA. Mankind has naively given pharma a blank check to modify human DNA with mRNA. Billions of injections of mRNA have occurred. No one knows what the mRNA codes are other than whoever controls the computer that directs the production of synthetic mRNA at the point of production. Multiple codes can be used in the same vial. Artificial Intelligence is likely directing the Directed Evolution program. There is no oversight.

Pfizer and Project Veritas appear to be referring to Directed Evolution of viruses, however. The are referring to mutating an existing virus in a process known as antibody dependent enhancement (ADE) or “vaccine enhanced replication” (as described by Robert Malone).

I am not convinced that mutations of an existing SARS-CoV-2 virus are occurring after vaccinations, however. There are two major competing theories.

In addition to the theory that vaccines cause mutations of a pre-existing virus (1), another theory I consider is that (2) the so-called “variants” of the SARS-CoV-2 virus have all been created by mRNA processes in a manner that was designed to simulate the mutation of a pre-existing virus. In other words, the “leak” or “spillover” of the virus never occurred as reported. The virus, and all the variants of the virus were simply in the needles. Although the so-called Pandemic clearly began about a year before the COVID vaccines, it is also clear that much of the initial phase of the Pandemic was driven by a intentional media-generated fear narrative, and misinterpreted PCR tests. Further still, the role of Robert Malone’s biowarfare expert colleague, Michael Callahan, in Wuhan Central Hospital and on cruise ships, where deaths of elderly occurred and were blamed on a coronavirus, has been censored by the media, leading to questions for me on the nature of the initial “COVID” deaths. In this background I cannot consider the spread of a virus from China to the rest of the world, where it “mutated” after encountering mRNA, to be a given.

Another point to consider in Pfizer’s denial that Pfizer “has not conducted gain of function or Directed Evolution research,” is that the mRNA methods used in the BNT162b2 mRNA were developed by BioNTech in Germany. So while Pfizer may be technically correct in saying that the corporate entity “Pfizer” did not conduct such research, that does not eliminate the likely truth that such research was conducted in Germany by their partner.

Robert Malone, the self-described “inventor of mRNA vaccine technology” many years ago, also responded to the Project Veritas report on Substack.

Charles Wright