Question for Scientists about Ralph Baric's "Methods for Producing Recombinant Coronavirus"

The most absurd fact about the COVID-19 Pandemic, to me at least, is that the more vaccines are used in geographic area, the more positive virus tests there are in that same area. If you look in many data sets, especially “Our World in Data,” you can see a striking positive correlation between the amount of vaccines and the amount of virus. This is true in comparisons between states, counties, countries, and even continents.

For instance.

Last summer, Maria Van Kerkhove, Technical Lead of the WHO, gave a press conference last summer where she complained that Africa was poor and wasn’t nearly as vaccinated as the rest of the world. She and the rest of the global vax crowd were calling for donations for poor unvaccinated Africa.

Funny thing though, poor unvaccinated Africa wasn’t getting the virus at anywhere near the same rates as the rest of the world either- as the WHO reported. (I spent considerable time trolling them on Twitter over this).

Now to the potential for a recombinant coronavirus.

In April 20, 2001, Ralph Baric filed a provisional application for “METHODS FOR PRODUCING RECOMBINANT CORONAVIRUS”

Ralph Baric wanted to Patent a method to make a coronavirus in pieces that will combine into one virus. It was funded by an NIH grant.

The only point I’m trying to make is that it is possible to create a recombinant coronavirus. If you want to know how, read the Patent application. I’m not saying this one patent is involved in either SARS2 or the “vaccines.” It’s a method.

My question is: Is it possible that the spike proteins and other unknown coronavirus elements generated by the mRNA in the so-called “vaccines” can combine with other elements of virus which may be already in human populations, and emerge after a period of time as an infectious virus? - Viruses such as Delta and Omicron waves, which clearly followed injection campaigns?

When I read Baric’s papers, I can’t tell the difference between “virus” and “vaccine” anyway. I don’t think he differentiates much himself. “Vaccine” and “virus” are just words. Baric is always making both sides with his tool kits and virus stock. “An important aspect of viral replicon particle systems, in terms of future use as an expression vector for vaccine development, is the lack of recombinant virus production. It is possible that mutations may evolve.. blah blah.” Whatever that means. And you wonder how we have vaccines AND virus all over the world. Except Africa.

Most of my subscriptions are being generated from reporting on the Pandemic, from talking about things with others who have similar interest on Twitter and other social media. I respect your opinions. If I don’t know something, I’ll ask a question. I probably have some followers who are much more educated on this topic than I am.

As far as I know, all the scientific community knows for a fact is that mRNA is in the “vaccines.” I don’t think they have samples of the mRNA and can tell us exactly what the mRNA does or does not do from anything other than a Pfizer/Moderna/whoever press release.

As for whether or not Pharma and Government are immoral enough to do something like that, and whether the press would censor it if they did, I think we know the answer to that by now.

And as for whether it could be done, according to Baric, it certainly could. Question is, can you tell me for a fact that didn’t happen? If you want to talk about it, I promise I don’t bite. This is just an academic question.

And thanks to the new members who subscribed recently from being retweeted by “Jikkyleaks” on Twitter.

Charles Wright