The Disease Industry misuses the word "Anecdotal."
I'm following Dr. Marivic Villa on Twitter. She observed a great increase in cancer and the destruction of immune systems in 550-600 patients due to mRNA. Her critics say that her observations are "anecdotal."
It reminds me of another time I argued against someone using the word "anecdotal" improperly. The American Heart Association improperly used the word "anecdotal" on November 24, 2021.
The AHA wrote an "Expression of Concern" about a paper Steve Gundy published in the AHA Journal. Gundy’s paper was published November 8, 2021, and titled:
Gundy published data that compared the PULS scores of 566 patients who were injected with mRNA twice, compared to their PULS scores before they were injected.
According to Lifelabs, on PULS score: "A Protein Unstable Lesion Signature Test, also known as PULS test, measures the traces of proteins that leak from cardiac lesions in the blood vessel walls. By identifying the presence and levels of these proteins, along with HDL and HbA1c, it provides your physician with valuable information to help determine your risk for a heart attack and what steps you need to take to improve your cardiac health."
According to Gundy, PULS scores from the 566 patients showed that risk of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) more than doubled from 11% to 25% in a 5-year period after being injected with mRNA twice.
The American Heart Association was not concerned about the increased risk of acute coronary syndrome, however. They were concerned that Gundy’s data was "anecdotal."
I wrote about how AHA lied in their use of the word "anecdotal" on Twitter on December 5, 2021. Of course my Twitter account is censored like hell, which is one of the reasons I started publishing on Substack.
You can choose to see this content, at least until Elon Musk buys Substack, which he has threatened to do.
At least Twitter has a new tool to show you how censored you really are. 7 impressions, while I get to watch people drop dead from heart events all over the world for years, and people worship the ground Elon Musk walks on.
Back to the point though. The data of Marivic Villa, Mary Bowden, Pierre Kory, Steve Gundy, and countless others, is not anecdotal. It is the exact opposite. Scientific data is "evidence that is collected using a repeatable method that can be independently verified by other people." We're talking about hundreds and thousands of observations of patients here from medical professionals. It’s nothing short of a God-Damned lie to call that data “anecdotal.”
While the data of these doctors is scientific, they are doctors of medicine, not statisticians. I recommend that they combine their data and hire a statistician to perform correct statistical analysis of their data and publish it.
Charles Wright