The fucking vaccine creates the fucking virus, study concludes.
Shrestha et al, Effectiveness of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Bivalent Vaccine, didn’t say “The fucking vaccine creates the fucking virus.”
The said, “The higher the number of vaccines previously received, the higher the risk of contracting COVID-19 (Figure 2).” Look at it. You want to stick that in your arm?
I’ll get to their weak and pathetic attempts to deny the obvious truth about the vaccines. I honestly think we’re dealing with some sort of mass clinical-level denial in the medical community. How can so many people be so intelligent, but just so incredibly fucking stupid and naive at the same time?
They said “The association of increased risk of COVID-19 with more prior vaccine doses was unexpected.”
Really? I guess they never looked at the Merck DNA/HIV trials where they created HIV. It was unexpected to me, but I didn’t go to Med School either. What the hell do they teach these people? From Efficacy assessment of a cell-mediated immunity HIV-1 vaccine (the Step Study): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, test-of-concept trial
Although HIV acquisition rates were similar in vaccine and placebo recipients with baseline Ad5 titers ≤18 (Ad5 seronegative participants), surprisingly, rates appeared to be more than twice as high in vaccines compared with placebo recipients in Ad5 strata >18, (overall HIV acquisition rate 5.1% vs. 2.3%/year, unadjusted two-tailed p-value 0.013). There was also evidence that the hazard ratio increased with increasing log10(Ad5) (univariate Cox model trend test p-value = .06).
That study used Mr. Whistleblower’s, Robert Malone’s, technology. Read more about it here.
Was Merck's HIV-producing "vaccine" technology a forerunner to vaccines producing viruses today?
One of the theories I have about the Vaxdemic is that COVID "viruses" can be created by “vaccines” through a recombinant process. Are they? Today the public accepts that the "vaccines" create a part, but only a part (do you trust them?) of the Sars-CoV-2 virus, the "spike protein. " The spike protein was in turn a bioweapon inserted into coronaviruse…
Continuing with the Shrestha study language and their efforts to find any possible explanation other than “The fucking vaccine creates the fucking virus.”
A possible explanation for a lower-than-expected vaccine effectiveness is that a substantial proportion of the population may have had prior asymptomatic Omicron variant infection. About a third of SARS-CoV-2 infections have been estimated to be asymptomatic in studies performed in different places at different times [17–19].
Say it with me, people. Omicron was created by the vaccines. They just changed the mRNA mix a little, and viola, a milder form of the “virus.” People even called Omicron a “Pandemic of the Vaccinated.” Multiple talking heads in media said in unison, “I have COVID, but I’m grateful I had the shot because it’s mild.”
What Omicron did was simulate ADE of an existing virus. There was no existing virus, not to anywhere near the extent of the Omicron cases, anyway.
Then they tried to say that the more vulnerable received the vax, which could explain why the vaxxed got more virus. But they wound up talking themselves out of it in the same paragraph because the data supported the exact opposite.
A simplistic explanation might be that those who received more doses were more likely to be individuals at higher risk of COVID-19. A small proportion of individuals may have fit this description. However, the majority of participants in this study were young, and all were eligible to have received ≥3 doses of vaccine by the study start date, which they had every opportunity to do. Therefore, those who received <3 doses (46% of individuals in the study) were not ineligible to receive the vaccine but rather chose not to follow the CDC's recommendations on remaining updated with COVID-19 vaccination, and one could reasonably expect these individuals to have been more likely to exhibit risk-taking behavior. Despite this, their risk of acquiring COVID-19 was lower than that that of participants those who received more prior vaccine doses.
Anyway, that’s enough. I’m disgusted at the level of controlled opposition to the truth, and the naivety of the medical community that refuses to consider the worst case scenarios that we are obviously living through.
Hey, wait for Robert Malone to explain it, right? He’ll twist it all up into some version where the vaccines just sort of mutate it, and he’s already warned us about it. And you’ll keep drinking the Kool-Aid.
Enjoy.
Charles Wright
Charles, your article prompted me to listen once again to David Martin's Corona Investigative Committee testimony from July 9, 2001. His presentation is a potent labyrinth of scientific and patent data that is a challenge in and of itself to fully untangle and comprehend. Revisiting his complete testimony after a couple of years of being mired in and saturated with all the COVID-19 muck allowed me to listen with "fresh ears" and better appreciate the alarming and practically incomprehensible nuances he exposes. It's left me to conclude "the virus," "the vaccine" and the coronavirus bioweapon are all just one in the same. Martin says what we have is "millions of people being injected with a pathogen-stimulating computer sequence which is being sold under what the patent office, medical profession and FDA, in its own clinical standards, would not be considered a vaccine…we are now subjecting hundreds of millions of people to what was known to be, by 2005, a bioweapon."
Dr. Martin presents exhaustive evidence contained in patents, patent applications, federal grants, procurement records, e-government records, etc., that shines a light on the CDC's criminal conspiracy and racketeering activities from 4/28/2003. He repeatedly shows how patent timelines of supposed treatments for a pathogen either precede the alleged discovery of the pathogen itself, or as in the case of Sequoia Pharmaceuticals, them filing a patent for antiviral agents for the treatment and control of infections by coronavirus a mere three days after the CDC filed a patent for all things associated with the coronavirus pathogen as well as the RTPCR method for its detection. He asks, "How do you have a patent for a treatment for something invented three days earlier?"
Dr. Martin says the "RICO pattern established 4/28/2003 for the first coronavirus was played out to exactly the same schedule where we see SARS-CoV-2 show up when we have Moderna getting spike protein sequences by phone from the Vaccine Research Center at NIAID prior to the definition of the [supposed] novel subclade. How do you treat a thing before you actually have the thing?" He goes on to say, "It's clear Moderna knew it was going to be placed in the front of the line with respect to the development of a vaccine in March 2019, because in March 2019, Moderna suddenly amended a series of patent filings (a bizarre behavior) to specifically make references to an intentional or accidental release, or 'deliberate release ' to use their terminology, of coronavirus."
Dr. Martin states he'll always refer to the COVID-19 pandemic as an "alleged outbreak," because "Coronavirus as a circulating pathogen inside the viral model we have is not new to the human condition for the last two decades. It's been part of a sequence of proteins circulating for a long time…"
Martin says from "2016 to 2019 at every one of the NIAID Advisory Council board meetings Fauci lamented the fact that they had been unable to get the public to accept a universal influenza vaccine" and how the Global Preparedness Board declared there must be a "coordinated global experience of a respiratory pathogen release [along with its associated vaccine] completed by September 2020." Peter Daszak of Eco Health Alliance furthered the proof of premeditation for intentional release with his public statement in 2015 about increasing the public's understanding for the need of medical countermeasures for a pan-coronavirus vaccine with a key driver being the media, how economics would follow the hype and the hype would be used to the advantage of investors who would respond if they saw profit.
In trying to synthesize the hour and nineteen minutes of Dr. Martin's testimony, all of which has been obtained from public records and never received a request for retraction or correction, I've become convinced the cover story for the alleged outbreak of COVID-19 in Wuhan, China, could have been initiated by either the administration of a toxic chemical such as Remdesivir to severely sicken and rapidly kill people, as you, Charles, theorize, or by the release of one of the "countless subtle modifications of [coronavirus'] gene sequences [made] over the past twenty years." I believe the Wuhan Institute of Virology, or any other such lab around the world worth its salt, could have duplicated any scourge pathogen computer code they wanted to and released it upon a population. To me, there was never a "virus" or a "vaccine," but just a longstanding coronavirus bioweapon chameleon dressed up to masquerade as a virus and/or a vaccine.
Thank you, Charles, for your unfailing ability to provoke and incite critical thought and discussion amongst your readers. God Bless!
https://ugetube.com/watch/david-e-martin-testifies-at-the-german-corona-inquiry-committee-july-9th-2021_StPPIUWeina1DCI.html
Damn right. The fucking vaccine created the fucking epidemics.
Simple as that. I wouldn't go as far as saying the vaccines created the virus, but they changed it in ways that allowed it to cause epidemics.
I am onto this. This is what we need to prove.
It's ridiculous how nobody noticed this. Instead all the critics were led into their own delusion of there "being no virus" or the virus not causing disease.