The Tweet that Twitter locked my account over

On August 22, a person named Nicholas Loubere tweeted: “A reminder. The reason we were unable to contain SARS-CoV-2 (and now monkeypox) is because people downplayed, minimised, foot-dragged, and shifted responsibility to the individual. NOT because people overreacted, or unnecessarily panicked, or took the threat too seriously...”

Around August 24, I “quote tweeted” his tweet with the reply: “The reason we were unable to "contain" SARS2 is because it never existed or transferred in the method the media and medical establishment claimed. Fear, false PCR tests, flu symptoms, and hospital murder protocols are what spread.”

And today, Twitter locked my account and gave me the option of deleting the tweet to restore my account. Instead, I have “appealed.” Under reason, I simply stated: “You are not medical authorities any more than I am.. You do not have the ability to determine if my statement is true or false.”

Now we all know that Twitter’s reputation as a “fact checker” of misinformation is a bad joke, and that generally speaking, their information censoring service serves the criminal organizations of the world such as the World Health Organization in their global pharmacide efforts. It’s so obvious that you don’t need me to tell you that.

One of the reasons I’m writing this is because what I said in the Tweet is still in question among people that I actually respect, people such as Meryl Nass in particular, who recently restated her position in “Is the Virus Real.”

I’ve reviewed my statement on Twitter, and the only thing I can take issue with is my use of the term “false PCR tests.” I went back and reviewed what Dr. Kerry Mullis said about PCR tests. Dr. Mullis was awarded a Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 1993 for developing the PCR test.

Dr. Mullis passed away just before the COVID-19 Vaxdemic, but before he passed, he spoke often about a false association that the medical establishment made between HIV and AIDS. The PCR tests that Dr. Mullis developed were used to substantiate the association between HIV and AIDS. The medical establishment said HIV was the cause of AIDS.

Dr. Mullis did not use the term “false” PCR tests though. He said the PCR results were misinterpreted.

Dr. Mullis: “I don’t think you can misuse PCR. Now, the results, the interpretations of it.. see, if they could find this virus in you at all... And the PCR, if you do it well, you can find almost anything in anybody. It starts making you sort of believe in the "Buddhist notion" that everything is contained in everything else. Because if you can amplify one single molecule up to something that you can measure, which PCR can do, then there’s just very few molecules that you don’t have at least one single one of them in your body, OK? So that can be thought of as a misuse of it, to claim that it’s meaningful.” (The term “Buddhist notion” appears to reference the notion of Faith in Buddhism).

"It's not an estimation. It's a really quantitative thing. It tells me something about nature, and about what's there. But it allows you to take a very minuscule amount of anything, and make it measurable, and then talk about it in meetings and stuff like it is important. See, that's not really a misuse, it's a misinterpretation."

So, technically, after reviewing the comments of Dr. Mullis, I can agree that my use of “false” is a bit lazy and inaccurate. Not that it’s enough to ban anyone over, but I would accept a “fact check” that the COVID-19 PCR tests were “misinterpreted” instead of false.

I’ll see how Twitter responds.

I’ll also write a more thorough article on the comments of Dr. Kerry Mullis on the use of PCR tests. I would like to see the likes of Meryl Nass respond to what he said about his statements of the misinterpretation of HIV and AIDS by the medical community.

Charles Wright