The virus. I’m not 100% in the “viruses do not exist” camp. Some viruses are real in my opinion. Bacteriophages are described as viruses, although I think they are better described as baby bacteria.
The invisible, hypothetical, computer-generated viruses like SARS 1 & 2 (Ventilators) are not real. They are excuses for the criminal activities of man. Fake “virus” sequences are cobbled together from multiple, unidentified compounds by computers. They contain common elements in all life. PCR tests can readily confirm the existence of common elements of the fake “virus” sequences in animals. Early in the fake “COVID” pandemic, Tanzania sent samples of various plants and animals to be tested for COVID, after giving the samples human names. They came back positive.
C’s Newsletter is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
The War on Farming is conducted in Europe via “Climate Change.” As the climate warms and CO2 levels rise, crop production and human population increases. Therefore, according to insane Malthusian logic, the human population must be starved in order to stop humans from multiplying, because, oh whatever. It’s too stupid to describe. If you want to know more about the European War on Farming strategy search the archives of The Freedom Corner with PeterSweden.
The European strategy to conduct the War on Farming via Climate Change is not politically tenable in the United States. Climate change has been successfully described as liberal hysteria and has virtually no political support on the right in the United States. Although I do believe the climate is warming, as it has been doing for millions of years, the net effect is positive for life on Earth.
All that needs to be done in the United States is say the word “virus” and Republicans and Democrats alike will order the destruction of herds of livestock, however.
First of all, it’s never been proven that H5N1 even exists. Let’s get this out of they way.
WHO, CDC, Robert Koch Institute (RKI), and Friedrich Loeffler Institute (FLI) claim that H5N1 (avian flu virus) is “highly contagious”. Further, Reinhard Kurth, president of RKI, says that H5N1 “threatens potentially all six billion people on earth”.
We identified four fundamental questions underlying these claims and requested supporting studies from FLI (which according to the German Government “possesses virus isolates of H5N1”):
1. Does H5N1 exist?
2. Is it pathogenic to animals?
3. Is it transmissible and pathogenic to humans, and does it have pandemic potential?
4. Have other causes for observed disease been studied?
FLI responded with four papers: PNAS [1], Science [2], J Virol [3] directed towards questions 1 and 2; EID [4] towards question 3; PNAS [1] towards question 4.
Question 1 (existence). FLI responded with, “H5N1/asia virus can be produced completely in vitro by using reverse genetics. The virus generated this way, also called infectious clone, cannot contain contaminants from sick animals” [translated from German]. However, PCR cannot be used to identify viruses which have not been previously sequenced [5].
The PNAS paper (as the others) does not show or reference the composition of the stock virus – nor does Subbarao et al. (referenced by the EID paper), which claims first characterization of H5N1 disease in a human in 1997 [6]. Though the EID study failed to detect “H5N1” in several of the diseased organs, this anomaly was labelled an “enigma”, rather than a “contradiction”.
Robert Webster, corresponding author of the PNAS paper and Director of WHO’s Collaborating Center for Studies on the Ecology of Influenza in Animals and Birds, informed us that stock viruses “are classified as select agents” and “we are not at liberty to release this information”. Without verification, and without purification described in any of these papers, we cannot accept that stock virus is pure and fully characterized. Inquiries for clarification to Webster, CDC Select Agents Program, and FLI received no response.
Question 2 (animal pathogenicity). Papers describe the use of natural routes, but disease was only achieved with extraordinary concentrations, up to 10 million EID per animal. None of the experiments used controls or blinding. The Science paper is highly abstract molecular science, employing elevated concentrations of chimeric variants.
Question 3 (human pathogenicity and pandemic potential). The EID paper is an anecdotal report of a 6-year-old boy from Thailand with severe multi-organ disease. No evidence was given for transmissibility to humans. The scientists found evidence of aspergillosis, and the boy was treated with toxic agents (broad-spectrum antimicrobial and antivirals) before he died.
Subbarao et al. (referenced by the EID paper), describes a previously healthy 3-year-old Hong Kong boy who developed flu-like symptoms in May 9, 1997, and was treated with broad-spectrum antibiotics and salicylic acid, though this is commonly contraindicated. He developed Reye’s Syndrome and died eleven days later [7]. A search commenced for causation within a limited range of flu viruses. H5N1 was claimed causative, even though coronaviruses, flaviviruses, enteroviruses, other pathogens and chemicals can also cause flu symptoms. There was no confirmation of prior avian contact. Regardless, warnings of an “explosive pandemic” appeared in this early document, though FLI conceded: “There is no scientific forecasting method that can evaluate the possibility that an influenza virus induces a new pandemic.”
Question 4 (non-“H5N1” causation). Neither the Subbarao et al study nor the FLI references consider reasonable, competing theories for disease causation, e.g., environmental and pharmaceutical factors.
Our analysis shows the papers do not satisfy our four basic questions. Claims of H5N1 pathogenicity and pandemic potential need to be challenged further.
Even if virologists ever do manage to isolate and sequence one of their viruses, and get an accurate sequence that can be confirmed by PCR test, virologists still have to prove that the virus “causes” the disease. Bacteria and bacteriphages form after disease as bacteria feed on dead and diseased tissue. The modern theory of virology would assume that small bits of glass and plastic found after automobile accidents were the cause of the accident.
It doesn’t even matter if the nonexistent “virus” is a “bird flu.” Globalists hate cattle even more than chickens. Malthusian Globalists can “mutate” their alleged virus in their papers and media to suit their needs.
Lets look at how they want to destroy cattle with H5N1.
A multistate outbreak of HPAI A(H5N1) bird flu in dairy cows was first reported on March 25, 2024. This is the first time that these bird flu viruses had been found in cows.
Because of the constantly evolving nature of influenza viruses, the World Health Organization and other animal health organizations continue to stress the importance of surveillance to detect and monitor virological, epidemiological, and clinical changes associated with emerging or circulating influenza viruses that may affect human or animal health.
SALEM, Ohio — Highly pathogenic avian influenza has now been detected in dairy cows in eight states, prompting some states to restrict cattle movements.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture confirmed on April 9 that dairy herds in North Carolina and South Dakota tested positive for HPAI, or bird flu.
The Michigan Department of Agriculture and Rural Development announced on April 12 three more HPAI cases were detected in dairy herds in three additional counties — Ionia, Isabella and Ottawa. The first detection in Michigan was in Montcalm County on March 29.
In all, 28 dairy herds have tested positive for HPAI: 11 herds in Texas, six in New Mexico, three in Kansas, four in Michigan, and one each in Ohio, Idaho, North Carolina and South Dakota.
South Dakota and North Carolina officials did not say if the affected herds had received cows from an earlier-affected state. The first herds affected by the outbreak in Texas and Kansas, announced by the USDA on March 25, are believed to have picked it up from wild birds, which carry the disease without showing symptoms.
The positive herd in Ohio and the first positive herd in Michigan tested positive for HPAI after receiving cows from affected herds in Texas that were not yet showing symptoms. It’s not clear how the more recent positive herds in Michigan contracted the virus.
June 6 (Reuters) - Dairy cows infected with avian flu in five U.S. states have died or been slaughtered by farmers because they did not recover, state officials and academics told Reuters.
Reports of the deaths suggest the bird flu outbreak in cows could take a greater economic toll in the farm belt than initially thought. Farmers have long culled poultry infected by the virus, but cows cost much more to raise than chickens or turkeys. …
In South Dakota, a 1,700-cow dairy sent a dozen of the animals to slaughter after they did not recover from the virus, and killed another dozen that contracted secondary infections, said Russ Daly, a professor with South Dakota State University and veterinarian for the state extension office who spoke with the farm. …
A farm in Michigan killed about 10% of its 200 infected cows after they too failed to recover from the virus, said Phil Durst, an educator with Michigan State University Extension who spoke with that farm.
Not that livestock don’t get sick. The first thing that intelligence farmers know to check is their feed stock.
The theory gained steam on Facebook, TikTok and Twitter in recent weeks, with some users reporting that their hens stopped laying eggs and speculating that common chicken feed products were the cause. Some went a step further to suggest that feed producers had intentionally made their products deficient to stop backyard egg production, forcing people to buy eggs at inflated prices.
“One of the largest egg producers in the country cut a deal with one of the largest feed producers in the country to change their feed formula so it no longer contains enough protein and minerals for your chickens to produce eggs,” one Facebook user wrote in a post shared more than 2,000 times. “They are now price gouging eggs to make bank.”
Some backyard chicken owners may have separately found their chickens underperforming, but experts say the issues are unrelated. While feed quality can affect hens’ egg-laying abilities, state agricultural officials told The Associated Press they have not heard of any widespread issues with feed affecting egg production, and several major feed suppliers say they haven’t changed their formulas.
“Because of high path avian influenza, we’ve had to depopulate millions of laying hens. And when you take that many chickens out of production, there’s fewer eggs,” said Ken Anderson, a poultry industry specialist at North Carolina State University. “And when there’s fewer eggs, the price goes up.”
Many social media users claimed that specific feed products, such as those offered by Purina Animal Nutrition and Tractor Supply, a chain of farm supplies stores, were at fault. Some said their hens started laying again after they switched feeds or made their own. But the companies deny that their products are to blame.
“Is there a broad conspiracy? No, there’s not a broad conspiracy,” said Todd Applegate, a professor in poultry science at the University of Georgia. “Beyond feed, there are a lot, probably even more so, things from the management and from the bird’s environment that creates different things that would cause her to either go out of production or lower her production.”
More than 43 million of the 58 million birds slaughtered over the past year to control the bird flu virus have been egg-laying chickens, The Associated Press has reported.
Elevated levels of sodium can cause increased water consumption, reduced feed efficiency, egg production, and growth rate and can be fatal in chickens. Elevated levels of calcium and/or phosphorus can cause reduced feed intake and feed conversion in swine, and elevated levels of magnesium and sodium can cause loose stools, reduced growth rate, and weakness in rabbits.
ELK CITY, OK – The storied stock contracting firm Beutler & Son Rodeo Company of Elk City, Oklahoma, is suffering devastating loss after their horses were given contaminated feed. Close to 70 horses have died, with numbers growing.
Early reporting that many of the Beutlers’ horses were accidentally fed cattle feed is false, according to Dr. Gregg VeneKlasen, the veterinarian for the Beutler family. As reported by journalist Kendra Santos, VeneKlasen said, “What these horses got was actually a horse feed mix with a huge amount of the cattle drug monensin (brand name Rumensin) in it,” VeneKlasen said. “This was a tragic case of human error somewhere along the line, because tiny amounts of monensin is poison to horses. It kills them. Monensin is used in some cattle feed, but this amount in this horse feed delivered to the Beutlers would have killed cattle, too.
Ultimately the monensin causes heart damage that is most of the time permanent. The horses symptoms will include loss of appetite, exercise intolerance, weakness and excessive sweating. There is no antidote for monensin toxicosis and a high percentage of time the treatment for a horse that has ingested monensin is just palative care.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has given the highest risk classification to several recalled animal feed products for beef and dairy cattle, lambs and deer.
The 15 products—all sold by the Vita Plus Corporation of Wisconsin—were recalled by the firm on August 7 after it was discovered they may contain excess minerals.
Just as with humans, animals need a supply of minerals in their diets to support various fundamental bodily functions, from forming bones and teeth to supporting metabolism. However, an excess of minerals can be as or even more harmful than not getting enough.
For example, sulfur-based minerals are vital in cattle for the normal growth and reproduction of the essential bacteria found in their first stomach, the rumen.
Too much, however, can interfere with the uptake of other key minerals and even cause "polioencephalomalacia," a disorder which softens the gray matter of the animals' brains, leading to a loss of appetite, staggering, and unusual behaviors—and in severe cases, blindness, seizures and the onset of coma.
Charles Wright
C’s Newsletter is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
