As I read the news on COVID-19 and mRNA adverse events today, I read them from the perspective that the mRNA causes COVID.
I wasn’t a medical expert before I began researching COVID-19, and I’m certainly not one now. Many people will want to say “you read that on the internet.” Yes I did. I attended college twice- that is to say, I toted books across large distances to different buildings to hear professors lecture and say turn to page whatever. And I got the little paper they hand out when you get done with all of that.
Of course, colleges are moving their programs online today. You can learn about most anything you want online without colleges directing your research. You won’t get the little piece of paper though.
So it’s important to note that I have learned from numerous medical professionals who have spoken in a clear and detailed manner on COVID-19 and the vaccines, very similar to college lectures that I once attended, but in a more upset manner. These are the censored doctors.
They doctors are aligned against corporations and government. Corporate media is obviously a partner of corporate pharmaceutical industry. Corporations obviously control the Departments of the Executive Branch of the United States. All of these forces are aligned against the truth these doctors are saying. Nevertheless, I paid attention to them.
There are too many doctors to list, but the most influential to me along the way have been Robert Malone, Zev Zelenko, Peter McCoullough, Pierre Kory, Mary Bowden, and Robert Young. Others blending the sciences of statistics and medicine like Steve Kirsch, Jessica Rose, and Robert Kennedy have been influential.
If I told you I had been toting books around a college for 2 years and listening to the foremost experts, physicians, and researchers in the world on a topic, you’d probably think I was qualified to have an opinion.
First of all, the spike proteins which are generated by the mRNA are toxic. There’s no doubt about it. I won’t bother to reference it, but you can look that up.
The theory of vaccination or inoculation is to take a weakened form of a virus and inject it into your body to trigger your body to create antibodies, in case you get the more nasty full virus later. Then you are protected from it to some extent, in theory.
In this case though, we’re not talking about putting a weakened virus into your body. We’re talking about putting a manmade disease delivery system into your body.
The mRNA injections are designed to trigger your body to create something as identical as possible to a man-made piece of protein called a spike protein. That’s a consensus. That’s what they tell you. Follow me here. The spike protein was made in a lab, probably by Ralph Baric under the leadership of Anthony Fauci, but that’s unclear. They don’t tell you that before you take it.
The spike protein is coated in HIV. It causes genetic damage and greatly increased cancer risk, among multiple other things. The spike protein is a manmade disease delivery system, not a form of a naturally-occurring virus. This spike protein just happens to have been inserted by Ralph Baric or someone into a “coronavirus.”
The theory of taking a weakened form of a virus as an inoculation does not hold here. It is a falsehood to say that you are taking a weakened form of a virus. You’re not getting a weakened form of a virus with the mRNA. You’re getting a manmade disease delivery system, a spike protein that creates disease. This spike protein was inserted into a virus, but was never a part of a natural virus.
There is no medical value to accepting a manmade bioweapon into your body. What you want to do is avoid it, whether in nature or in needles.
In the introduction, I read the news from the perspective that the mRNA causes COVID. The only weak spot of this theory is the period before the vaccines, but that could have been simulated by false PCR tests.
For example, in recent news.
Last night I had a spirited debate with someone who described him or herself as a “RNA scientist.” We were discussing the miscarriages created by the mRNA-generated spike proteins. (As Dr. Robert Young has described it, some of the “capsules” which contain the mRNA are coated in a protein that directs the spike proteins to reproductive areas in women).
Disputing that mRNA caused an increase miscarriages, the “RNA scientist” referenced a paper published in Nature.
I, in turn, noted that the authors of the Nature paper had lied about the vaccination status of people in their statistics. These researchers said that anyone who developed COVID within 21 days of receiving a vaccine was unvaccinated.
Defending the lie, that people who were vaccinated were unvaccinated, the “RNA scientist” said that it took 21 days for the body to develop antibodies from the shots.
Follow the logic here, accepting as fact that in the first 21-day period, the body has not yet developed antibodies to defend against the toxin.
In this first 21 day period following vaccination, the body is undefended from the toxins, and the toxins will be more likely to cause death and miscarriage.
Along the lines of antibody theory, there should be 3 statistical categories: (1) Unvaccinated, (2) Vaccinated within 21 days before the antibodies develop, and (3) Vaccinated more than 21 days after the antibodies develop. Other categories should of course be added for multiple vaccinations, but let’s look at these 3.
In the first 21-day period when the body is undefended with antibodies from the mRNA-generated toxic spike proteins, the researchers at Nature transferred the death, diseases (including COVID), miscarriages, and so forth into the “unvaccinated” category. They transferred (2) into (1). I would be interested to compare rates of 1, 2, and 3. It seems like 2 should be higher than 3. That is to say, the researcher appear not only to transfer death, disease, and miscarriage to unvaccinated, but also appear to transfer the most high-risk period of the vaccines to the unvaccinated category.
The researchers at Nature can create 3 statistical lies in this process. 1. Falsely lower the rates of death, disease and miscarriage of the “vaccinated” category. 2. Falsely increase the rates of death, disease and miscarriage of the “unvaccinated” category. 3. Falsely shift the balance of death, diseases, and miscarriages from “vaccinated” to “unvaccinated” in any ratios of likelihood they derive from their underlying false statistics.
Lies, damned lies, and statistics. They know exactly what they are doing. It is likely that all statistics that show safety and effectiveness of vaccines contain some type of intentional false premise or data manipulation. In this case at least, it’s easy to ferret out.
In other recent news, doctors testified before the Texas Senate on an issue I’ve been covering, death by hospital protocol. A lot of disturbing information has come out from these hearings in the Texas Senate, and I was going to summarize some of it.
I found the link to the hearings. The first person I listened to was Texas Senator Lois Kolkhorst. She’s very concerned and very confused. She says as much. Her confusion bothered me so much that I couldn’t stand it, so I have to write this “Vaxdemic Theory” before I can move on to cover the deaths by hospital protocols. I don’t mean to pick on Senator Kolkhorst. What we’re dealing with here is one the greatest deceptions that mankind has ever known. She just represents a certain stage in the mind of the public that is waking up. It takes us all some time to wake up to it, myself included. Here’s what she said:
It just seems like 2.5 years later, I find ourselves in a place that I’m shocked that America has not led more aggressively on. There’s obviously there’s a push for vaccines, but I think maybe even more important, because we see people who are vaccinated, triple vaccinated, are getting COVID. Where is the push for our therapeutics?
And yes, we should be pushing for therapeutics. I agree.
I’d like to straighten out her confusion over the increased COVID rates after vaccines. In Texas-speak, the cart is in front of the horse. The toxic spike proteins of the mRNA vaccines cause the disease symptoms which are diagnosed as COVID (and numerous other diseases). The more you take of the toxin, the more you are likely to develop one of these diseases.
To stop the “Pandemic,” stop what’s causing it. Stop the vaccines. Stop the Vaxdemic.
You can approach truth using logic the same way doctors can approach truth using medical theory. Occam’s razor theory says that if you have two competing possibilities, the one where you have to make fewer logical leaps as proof is true. That is, the more simple the theory, the more likely it is to be true.
That doesn’t hold well if it’s 100 to 99 or something. But in this case, where I’m saying that the vaccines cause COVID, that’s one leap versus all the other information in the world which is just not adding up. Look at the news that way and see if it doesn’t start to make sense.
Also in the news yesterday is that the government now wants to create a separate class of vaccines for the “Omicron” variant of COVID. Omicron, of course, was entirely generated by the vaccines. The only people who got Omicron took the vaccines. They know it. You know it. It’s a consensus. Now they want to give you another vaccine, to cure the disease that they gave you in the first place with a vaccine.
Some people describe this as “insanity.” It isn’t. We all know that sane people can be fooled by magic tricks, or hypnotized. This is just a big deception, magic trick, or whatever you want to call it, on a global scale. This is what globalists are capable of doing. One of the problems in understanding a trick of this nature is that you don’t think the globalists are capable of controlling this much of the media, corporations, and governments around the world. But they clearly are.
And I could keep on going with the news, but you get the point. Just read it from the perspective that the vaccines cause COVID, and all the other bad things associated with COVID, and see if it makes sense.
As Hitler described it, this is “the Big Lie.” Too big for most to see.
Charles Wright