Anonymous FDA Spokeswoman confirms to Zachary Steiber at Epoch Times that Pfizer's COVID vaccines contain SV40; Stieber lies to make Malone look better, and does not mention Malone's Patent
Controlling the Narrative: Epoch Times and Zachary Stieber.
As millions are dying from Cancer from Pfizer’s vaccines, Zachary Stieber of the Epoch Times wrote a biased, deceptive, and unduly flattering article about Doctor Robert Malone’s opinion regarding the inclusion of SV40 fragments in Pfizer’s vaccines. Stieber quoted an FDA “spokeswoman” that he did not identify.
FDA Responds After Being Urged to Recall Pfizer's Vaccine Over DNA Fragments, October 31, 2023
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is refusing to recall Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine, promoting the view that the inclusion of a previously-undisclosed DNA sequence that leaves behind fragments is not of concern.
The FDA is not required to take Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine, or other COVID-19 shots, off the market, an agency spokeswoman told The Epoch Times via email.
"With over a billion doses of the mRNA vaccines administered, no safety concerns related to the sequence of, or amount of, residual DNA have been identified. With regard to the FDA-approved mRNA vaccines, available scientific evidence supports the conclusion that they are safe and effective," the spokeswoman added.
Who is this unidentified “agency spokewoman” who the Stieber gained access to? You know, I recall a bit about SEC regulations regarding “insider trading” information. Corporations are not allowed to selectively leak information that can materially affect their stock price. They have to schedule a press conference, and then tell everyone at the same time. Not the FDA though. They let an anonymous FDA employee tell a reporter extremely important things, who in turn puts his spins it to favor the people who should be asked tough questions, and then puts it out in some exclusive article. While millions are dying from Cancer because of Pfizer’s poison.
I don’t like the way this information has developed one bit. Malone has said several times that he has influence over people at the FDA. I have also written that the Malones are likely paid by Pfizer for Patent US6110898A.
You can read more about Malone’s Patent and the context of how the Malones are likely paid by Pfizer in my article below.
Dr. Robert Malone downplays Cancer Risk of Pfizer Vaccines.
Based on a Patent, Robert Malone may have a financial stake in the Pfizer vaccine technology which causes Turbo Cancer. Let’s start with “Turbo Cancer reports in Children Ages 10-19” compiled by William Makis and reported by the Exposing The Darkness substack.
On Pfizer’s relationship with Malone, Stieber only cursely noted that:
A number of scientists have said the inclusion raises major concerns, such as having potential for oncogenesis—or a process that leads to cancer—including Dr. Robert Malone, a vaccine expert whose work has been cited by Pfizer.
First of all, Stieber did not quote Robert Malone as saying “scientists have said the inclusion raises major concerns, such as having potential for oncogenesis—or a process that leads to cancer—including Dr. Robert Malone.” There’s a very big difference between what Stieber wrote and what Dr. Malone said.
“This is not full SV40; it’s DNA fragments. SV40 is associated with tumors…(but) this isn’t that. In my mind the risk is not acute; I’m not hyper-alarmed about this.”
So essentially Stieber lied to make Malone look good. If Malone wanted to say there was a “major concern,” he would have said so. Instead, he said “the risk is not acute; I’m not hyper-alarmed about this.” Is that what it takes to get a quote (including lies about cancer) from a “spokeswoman” he refused to identify?
Back to the Patents. Stieber is quite informed on Pfizer’s legal actions regarding Patents and “vaccines,” but for some reason, wheras I have reported on Malone’s Patent negotiations with Pfizer, Stieber did not say a word. I bet he knows more about it than I do. Let’s look at the article Stieber cited when he said: “Robert Malone, a vaccine expert whose work has been cited by Pfizer.”
Pfizer Asks Court to Revoke Moderna's COVID-19 Vaccine Patents, August 31, 2023. Stieber reported:
Pfizer and BioNTech said in new filings to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office's Patent Trial and Appeal Board that Moderna's patents are so broad that they essentially "coopt the entire field" of messenger RNA technology, which is used in some COVID-19 vaccines.
The patents, obtained during the COVID-19 pandemic, are "unimaginably broad" and cover technology that was known long before 2015, when Moderna says it developed the technology, one filing stated.
According to Stieber, Pfizer said that Moderna’s Patents are too broad, eh? Where have I heard that before? Oh yeah, from Robert Malone on Twitter a few years ago. He was talking about how Pfizer was going to take him to court because they said a Patent of his was “too broad.” And that Patent was the God-Damned Patent above with the God-Damned SV40 fragments in it.
That’s what you get from “reporters” today. Everything has to be released through a filter, with all the little criminals conspiring on a Narrative. We don’t even know the name of the person at the FDA who gave Stieber the confirmation on the SV40, for Christ’s Sake.
Dr. Malone told Stieber that Pfizer’s vaccines should be recalled. I agree that Pfizer’s vaccines should be recalled. Afterwards, I demand that Laws against mass homicide and maiming be enforced because the inclusion of SV40 fragments was intentionally designed to cause cancer.
I realize some of this reporting is redundant, but I am for now showing you how the media lies and how easy it is to correct them. Let them be known for who and what they are.
Charles Wright
Wow, this is fascinating about how you go into depth of Malone. Your research keeps me on the edge of my seat! I worked in patent litigation for 10 years so knowing a little about it, I know someone signed this technology to the DOD through a Patent License Agreement. I would think a FOIA request would unlock the secret and expose the profiteer! And the profiteer knows what they were using it for! Great read👍🏽👍🏽impressive! Keep it going!
THIS 💥
"So essentially Stieber lied to make Malone look good. If Malone wanted to say there was a “major concern,” he would have said so. Instead, he said “the risk is not acute; I’m not hyper-alarmed about this.”
This is why I dont like Sasha. Sasha "outs" the DOD but minimizes bioweapons... jabs bad is all she says, just like Malone. She calls me a troll just like Malone plus worse, calls me other names for asking question, disagreeing with her. She twists my words so people wont listen to me, makes me sound unreasonable by putting words in my mouth, says well you think we are all a bucket of genes (no I did not say this). She said bioweapons are NOT able to kill large amounts of people. How are we able to charge DOD when the very things that exist are being downplayed by the people who are leading the freedom movement?
She is extremely combative to anyone who disagrees, attacks the person, called me a bad mom, all my substacks about her. My substacks are mostly medical. She tells others to stop engaging with me and block me. She acts as if her "fame" makes her untouchable like Malone, her groupies will still sycophant no matter how she acts, they will do what she says.
I am here to NOT do what experts like her tell me to. I'm here to think for myself.
Add to this she pushed for vaccine mandates 10 or so years ago, wanting all vaccines to be mandated in Canada because her brother was in a position to change laws and wanted all vaccines forced. The doctor who told me this knew it was wrong to mandate any drug. Why didnt Sasha know it's wrong to force vaccines on children/adults? Why is this ok? One in 40 children with autism say this isnt ok. Their parents, like me, say this is NOT OK.