Depopulation Agenda discussed by Doctors at a Twitter Spaces event on Censorship
Good on you, Dr. Urso.
Doctors met to discuss the topic of censorship on a Twitter Spaces event on January 08, 2023, in an event titled New Year Reunion of Censored Voices. Doctors who spoke included Richard Urso, Pierre Kory, Lynn Fynn, Robert Malone, Kat Lindley, Tess Lawrie, and others.
The topic drifted from censorship to the so-called “depopulation agenda” around the 1:38:00 mark of the conference after James Freeman asked Robert Malone a question about the “depopulation agenda.”
Robert Malone, as he has often done, threw “transnational organizations” under the bus for the depopulation agenda. In my opinion, the role of the Department of Defense and the CIA has always been lacking from Malone’s analysis of this agenda. Malone, the inventor of the mRNA vaccine technology, has described himself as a DTRA contractor, and as having friends in the CIA, so perhaps he has a conflict of interest.
Malone’s commentary basically was that although he had seen enough public information on depopulation plans from “transnational organizations” for him to speak out against these organizations, he had seen no documentation from within the US government or the pharmaceutical industry. I think it’s an extremely naive position to assume that these organizations would prepare a “smoking gun” document of their plans, far too naive for a man of Malone’s intelligence, although no one can make him speculate if he doesn’t want to.
Dr. Richard Urso pointed out that “top scientists” involved in “lipid nanoparticles” simply had to be aware of the potential for them to cause adverse events. Dr. Malone presented an alternative hypothesis to Dr. Urso’s position, something along the lines of doctors simply not questioning things enough. Dr. Urso reasserted his position that top scientists had to know of the potential of what has happened to happen.
In order to provide a full context of the remarks I have referenced, I have included the full text of Drs Urso and Malone, and the originating question of James Freeman. Some of the words I could not transcribe in places (denoted by ?), and there may be a few errors, but it is a good transcript overall.
James Freeman: 1:38:33. “Can I just jump in again? Just for a second? I’m James Freeman. And Robert, we met at the better way conference in Bath last year where I interviewed you.”
“At the time we were sort of talking about the WEF and the WHO working in tandem. And we were kind of exploring why they might be going about all of this. And you mentioned the depopulation word. I’m just wondering where you sit on that now?”
1:39:00. Robert Malone: “Same place I sat. And I try really hard to stay within the guardrails of things that are documented. And remind people that I cannot read minds. So I can’t know what hidden agendas are. Or what individuals intents are. There’s no question that there is rich documentation in frankly most of these transnational organizations of an assessment and expressed desire to reduce the burden of human population on the earth. And this goes even further in some cases to explicit plans. However. I don’t … I have not found any clear documentation that in the case of these products, that was an expressed intent, and so one can only infer, and I don’t do that.”
“That said, umm, in fact perhaps because I’ve always tried to take a balanced position despite the accusations, I have been approached by some very senior aides in the Senate, who have significant additional information, about government documents which are not publicly available that speak to a variety of agendas that have not yet been disclosed.”
Note: Malone’s “balanced position” is a position that I find to be questionable. Further, I am not comfortable with US Senators sharing information with Robert Malone, but not the public. If this information is classified, it is illegal to share it with Malone. In any case, why keep it secret but tell Malone??
“So I may find myself modifying that position when I see the actual documents that Pfizer or Bill Gates or ? or Klaus Schwab or ? or any of the others envisioned, or the senior scientists at the vaccine research center envisioned that this would be a lethal bioweapon. I frankly object to that language that’s often bandied about without any clear evidence to support it other than inference. I think this is very dangerous and it will be weaponized against us as these things often are. So I just don’t go there. I hope I’ve answered your question.”
1:41:47. Dr. Richard Urso: “Can I tag onto Robert? I think the inference is a simple one. The distribution of lipid nanoparticles is well known prior to this rollout. They definitely go to brain, heart, bone marrow, adrenals, and as is shown, ovaries. Ovaries have lots of H2 receptors. They’re going to cause inflammation. The very thought that someone wouldn’t think that it might affect fertility is absurd. Over.”
Robert Malone: 1:42:42. “To go down that road, we have to dive into issues of the groupthink that happens in pharmaceutical industry development. I know you’re well familiar with that as are many others here, and I, I caution that uhh what we may have observed and encountered and been subjected to, uhh, umm, may well be the consequence of a form of uhh, uhh, blindness, due to self interest and and uhh silo organization within pharma, within the government. So that uhh, no, very few people are aware of of the full scope and and they all kind of sit within their own little silos. And think about the things that they’re supposed to think about and not talk about other things. Umm I think that what what has transpired personally is that it wasn’t until there was some folks coming in from the outside that, and perhaps you’re one of those, looking at the whole sum of what was transpiring, umm that were able to assemble the pieces and break through the cloud of propaganda et cetera that we all are subjected to. So good on you for having done it. But I, I, I, umm, it is possible, that, uhh, people were so siloed, that, umm, they didn’t question, umm, what was transpiring and they didn’t really question the safety and effective. They just kind of went from day to day, umm, following orders, and thinking that they were responding effectively to a public health crisis. That is an alternative explanation, over.”
Richard Urso: “Yeah, please let me address that. I agree with you Robert, very much. My point being that the top scientists had to know. Umm, there may be many others did not, but the top scientists who had worked with lipid nanoparticles would be very familiar with this. And and so there were people who had to know. And so agree with you. That’s why you’ve never heard me say it’s uhh some kind of population agenda thing. I just have never gone there either, because I don’t have any facts of that record. I mean to say that. But I actually feel very comfortable saying that I know top scientists that are in this field that helped developed these, had to know in some sense that it might have an effect and should have potentially been carefully looked at.”
Charles Wright
In the early 2000s, I cannot recall the year, I read about the promise of lipid nano-particles as carriers of chemotherapeutic agents into the brain. Because of the blood-brain barrier, treatment of brain cancer had specific challenges, and nano-particles held promise of overcoming that barrier. That sounded great at the time.
In early 2021, I read of the mRNA shots that promised RNA would be stabilized by lipid nano-particles, so that the normally ephemeral RNA could enter cells and cause them to manufacture spike protein, thus stimulating antibodies. At the time, the idea sounded like a Rube Goldberg approach. Why cause our own bodies to manufacture something we are trying to get rid of? Moreover, why use a technology created for transporting chemotherapeutic agents across the blood-brain barrier to import that spike maker into our cells? What would guarantee that the spike making tech would not enter the brain? So, I, a lay person, had those questions, and the shots sounded unbelievably risky to me. But Robert Malone, MD MS and inventor, was too siloed to think about that possibility? Perhaps so, because he took two vaccines and was injured. There is some missing information here.
Is there reason to have thought the technology had advanced to the point where the nano-particle could be so specifically controlled after administration that a scientist could reasonably expect the agent would remain in the deltoid, as would the spike proteins generated?
And then there is this segment in Dr. Malone’s article of January, 2023, “Shedding Innocence,” regarding discussions of depopulation agendas accusations:
. I received a call from a decades-long colleague employed at a senior level (GS-15) at the Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) darkly warning me to not discuss Dr. Michael Callahan or his activities in China during 2019-2020, or there would be consequences. I was warned by a well known broadcaster to “stay in my lane” and not discuss the World Economic Forum, its plans and activities. In a world where the term