And then there is this segment in Dr. Malone’s article of January, 2023, “Shedding Innocence,” regarding discussions of depopulation agendas accusations:
. I received a call from a decades-long colleague employed at a senior level (GS-15) at the Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) darkly warning me to not discuss Dr. Michael Callahan or his activities in China during 2019-2020, or there would be consequences. I was warned by a well known broadcaster to “stay in my lane” and not discuss the World Economic Forum, its plans and activities. In a world where the term
Well, from what I have seen of such investigations, they put on a good show, they get to the point of a criminal referral, and then some Intelligence Committee or a group of entrenched bureaucrats causes any revelations to be whitewashed or to just fizzle out. Not sure we have ever seen DTRA or DARPA upper echelon testify before Congress. Do you know? What I have seen is unelected heads of intelligence departments lying with complete impunity before Congress. You know, telling the least dishonest lie. Or simply not answering because classified.
True. I was thinking that the Breggins had the right to discovery in Malone’s lawsuit against them. That might be a way to move information into the public domain.
In the early 2000s, I cannot recall the year, I read about the promise of lipid nano-particles as carriers of chemotherapeutic agents into the brain. Because of the blood-brain barrier, treatment of brain cancer had specific challenges, and nano-particles held promise of overcoming that barrier. That sounded great at the time.
In early 2021, I read of the mRNA shots that promised RNA would be stabilized by lipid nano-particles, so that the normally ephemeral RNA could enter cells and cause them to manufacture spike protein, thus stimulating antibodies. At the time, the idea sounded like a Rube Goldberg approach. Why cause our own bodies to manufacture something we are trying to get rid of? Moreover, why use a technology created for transporting chemotherapeutic agents across the blood-brain barrier to import that spike maker into our cells? What would guarantee that the spike making tech would not enter the brain? So, I, a lay person, had those questions, and the shots sounded unbelievably risky to me. But Robert Malone, MD MS and inventor, was too siloed to think about that possibility? Perhaps so, because he took two vaccines and was injured. There is some missing information here.
Is there reason to have thought the technology had advanced to the point where the nano-particle could be so specifically controlled after administration that a scientist could reasonably expect the agent would remain in the deltoid, as would the spike proteins generated?
Apparently he took the 2 jabs having had an admitted case of Covid in Feb 2020 that he treated with famotidine. So he would have had natural immunity for some time.
That would be true especially for that time period. However, he seemed unaware of the risks which is quite surprising - even though evidence did not yet exist, he understood the technology and surely was aware of the animal studies.
My understanding is that he once had very high hopes for an universal vaccine platform, but got away from that area of research decades ago. He mentioned that during his mRNA vaccine research era, the researchers could never get beyond antibody disease enhancement.
And then there is this segment in Dr. Malone’s article of January, 2023, “Shedding Innocence,” regarding discussions of depopulation agendas accusations:
. I received a call from a decades-long colleague employed at a senior level (GS-15) at the Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) darkly warning me to not discuss Dr. Michael Callahan or his activities in China during 2019-2020, or there would be consequences. I was warned by a well known broadcaster to “stay in my lane” and not discuss the World Economic Forum, its plans and activities. In a world where the term
Congress and the FBI both need to investigate his allegations, don’t you think?
Well, from what I have seen of such investigations, they put on a good show, they get to the point of a criminal referral, and then some Intelligence Committee or a group of entrenched bureaucrats causes any revelations to be whitewashed or to just fizzle out. Not sure we have ever seen DTRA or DARPA upper echelon testify before Congress. Do you know? What I have seen is unelected heads of intelligence departments lying with complete impunity before Congress. You know, telling the least dishonest lie. Or simply not answering because classified.
True. I was thinking that the Breggins had the right to discovery in Malone’s lawsuit against them. That might be a way to move information into the public domain.
This Catherine Austin Fitts podcast may shed a bit of insight
https://home.solari.com/excerpt-malone-vs-breggin-law-suit/
She makes some good points and I agree with her about Desmet's book.
In the early 2000s, I cannot recall the year, I read about the promise of lipid nano-particles as carriers of chemotherapeutic agents into the brain. Because of the blood-brain barrier, treatment of brain cancer had specific challenges, and nano-particles held promise of overcoming that barrier. That sounded great at the time.
In early 2021, I read of the mRNA shots that promised RNA would be stabilized by lipid nano-particles, so that the normally ephemeral RNA could enter cells and cause them to manufacture spike protein, thus stimulating antibodies. At the time, the idea sounded like a Rube Goldberg approach. Why cause our own bodies to manufacture something we are trying to get rid of? Moreover, why use a technology created for transporting chemotherapeutic agents across the blood-brain barrier to import that spike maker into our cells? What would guarantee that the spike making tech would not enter the brain? So, I, a lay person, had those questions, and the shots sounded unbelievably risky to me. But Robert Malone, MD MS and inventor, was too siloed to think about that possibility? Perhaps so, because he took two vaccines and was injured. There is some missing information here.
Is there reason to have thought the technology had advanced to the point where the nano-particle could be so specifically controlled after administration that a scientist could reasonably expect the agent would remain in the deltoid, as would the spike proteins generated?
Apparently he took the 2 jabs having had an admitted case of Covid in Feb 2020 that he treated with famotidine. So he would have had natural immunity for some time.
He sad he took the series because he assumed he would need proof of vaccination for travel.
That would be true especially for that time period. However, he seemed unaware of the risks which is quite surprising - even though evidence did not yet exist, he understood the technology and surely was aware of the animal studies.
My understanding is that he once had very high hopes for an universal vaccine platform, but got away from that area of research decades ago. He mentioned that during his mRNA vaccine research era, the researchers could never get beyond antibody disease enhancement.