Discussion about this post

User's avatar
OldSysEng's avatar

Huh. No mention of the tremendous heat visible in the ruins for almost 6 weeks.

Expand full comment
Petra Liverani's avatar

How can we be sure that anything told or presented to us about 9/11 is not propaganda?

1. We know that the footage of the destructions of the twin towers and WTC-7 is fake ... cos they tell us Revelation-of-the-Method style.

https://petraliverani.substack.com/p/911-the-movie

2. Ditto we also know that the imagery of Ground Zero is fake.

Faking the rubble - https://cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?t=489

They have us all chasing our tails with what exactly brought the buildings down, presenting propaganda for each of five methods: fire, DEWs, thermite/nanothermite, nukes/mini nukes and good old controlled demolition (CD).

Even though I think we have to plump for CD as it is the only known method for bringing down high rise steel frame buildings and there is nothing compelling provided for any of the others, they still presented p-r-o-p-a-g-a-n-d-a for CD to maximise the tail-chasing.

Toppling the towers: why five purported methods?

https://petraliverani.substack.com/p/toppling-the-towers-why-five-purported

Expand full comment
6 more comments...

No posts