They have us all chasing our tails with what exactly brought the buildings down, presenting propaganda for each of five methods: fire, DEWs, thermite/nanothermite, nukes/mini nukes and good old controlled demolition (CD).
Even though I think we have to plump for CD as it is the only known method for bringing down high rise steel frame buildings and there is nothing compelling provided for any of the others, they still presented p-r-o-p-a-g-a-n-d-a for CD to maximise the tail-chasing.
What are you saying here, Charles? ...besides your contempt for Dr. Judy Woods. I don't get your argument. Maybe you've made it in excess in previous articles...
There were smoldering fires at the bottom of the debris, but if you're saying it was all too hot to move for weeks, that's false. A great deal of debris before they got to the bottom. Did you not read it, or are you saying that the original sources quoted are false:
"By 2:00 a.m. on September 12, trucks began to arrive with loads of steel and solid material from Ground Zero."
"within 48 hours of September 11th the city had started removing material from Ground Zero and by the 14th, 3 days later; over 10,000 tons of debris and scrap had been moved to Fresh Kills Landfill."
"On September 21st, HNSE agreed under our preexisting contract with the Department of Sanitation to take on the task of recycling all the steel and mixed scrap at the landfill, we finally got a chance to see for ourselves what had already been shipped there from Ground Zero. What we saw has never before been seen and hopefully will never again. Over 35,000 tons of steel beams from the WTC towers were stacked in remarkably neat rows, approximately 20 feet high."
Do I have to post the whole article again for you?
as a ny'er i can vouch for the endless parade of 18-wheelers full of steel beams and other detritus.
i think a lot of people who weren't there confuse the DEW attack on the vehicles across the street in the embassy suites parking lot with the controlled demolition of the towers. there was some overlap and that's what judy wood's videos show
How can we be sure that anything told or presented to us about 9/11 is not propaganda?
1. We know that the footage of the destructions of the twin towers and WTC-7 is fake ... cos they tell us Revelation-of-the-Method style.
https://petraliverani.substack.com/p/911-the-movie
2. Ditto we also know that the imagery of Ground Zero is fake.
Faking the rubble - https://cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?t=489
They have us all chasing our tails with what exactly brought the buildings down, presenting propaganda for each of five methods: fire, DEWs, thermite/nanothermite, nukes/mini nukes and good old controlled demolition (CD).
Even though I think we have to plump for CD as it is the only known method for bringing down high rise steel frame buildings and there is nothing compelling provided for any of the others, they still presented p-r-o-p-a-g-a-n-d-a for CD to maximise the tail-chasing.
Toppling the towers: why five purported methods?
https://petraliverani.substack.com/p/toppling-the-towers-why-five-purported
What are you saying here, Charles? ...besides your contempt for Dr. Judy Woods. I don't get your argument. Maybe you've made it in excess in previous articles...
Judy Woods said the steel turned to dust and it did not. Why do I need to explain this?
Huh. No mention of the tremendous heat visible in the ruins for almost 6 weeks.
So what? What does that have to do with the amount of steel shipped off that never turned to dust?
It was red-orange hot and steaming, cooling slowly over weeks. Not so easy to move it about. That is all. I said nothing about steel turning to dust.
There were smoldering fires at the bottom of the debris, but if you're saying it was all too hot to move for weeks, that's false. A great deal of debris before they got to the bottom. Did you not read it, or are you saying that the original sources quoted are false:
"By 2:00 a.m. on September 12, trucks began to arrive with loads of steel and solid material from Ground Zero."
"within 48 hours of September 11th the city had started removing material from Ground Zero and by the 14th, 3 days later; over 10,000 tons of debris and scrap had been moved to Fresh Kills Landfill."
"On September 21st, HNSE agreed under our preexisting contract with the Department of Sanitation to take on the task of recycling all the steel and mixed scrap at the landfill, we finally got a chance to see for ourselves what had already been shipped there from Ground Zero. What we saw has never before been seen and hopefully will never again. Over 35,000 tons of steel beams from the WTC towers were stacked in remarkably neat rows, approximately 20 feet high."
Do I have to post the whole article again for you?
as a ny'er i can vouch for the endless parade of 18-wheelers full of steel beams and other detritus.
i think a lot of people who weren't there confuse the DEW attack on the vehicles across the street in the embassy suites parking lot with the controlled demolition of the towers. there was some overlap and that's what judy wood's videos show