I’ve been doing some research on “Zika virus” and Microcephaly lately. The most likely source of Microcephaly in Brazil by far apears to be Pyriproxyfen added to water tanks to stop mosquito larvae from developing. Pyriproxyfen, a growth inhibitor, was known by the manufacturer to cause low brain mass in the offspring of mice.
Looks like Brazil began DTP vaccines in Nov 2014. 2014 was also the year Pyriproxyfen started. So was it one, the other, or both? This study in the US 2007-2013 didn't show an increase in Microcephaly risk with DPT vaccines during pregnancy. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2576582 That doesn't mean they weren't injected them with the exact same ingredients in Brazil that they were in the US. It doesn't mean that you can exclude DPT vaccine potential cause of microcephaly if the vaccine was taken prior to pregnancy. I'm just trying to figure it out. Data and statistics are tricky. I know DPT vaccines are bad about causing Autism.
In the nationwide Control Group study of entirely unvaccinated (post birth) across 48 states, we had ONE case of microcephaly, and the mother of this child HAD been vaccinated DURING the pregnancy. In those who had never been exposed to vaccines during the pregnancy, there were ZERO cases of this condition. In fact, the overall birth defect rate in those without exposure to pregnancy vaccines came in at 0.29% (from all OTHER possible causes).
The national average for birth defects in the U.S. is just over 3%, in a nation where 50% of all pregnancies are vaccinated. In the Control Group study, we found slightly over 6% of babies born to mothers who were vaccinated during the pregnancy had birth defects.
Basically, if the mother vaccinates during the pregnancy, she's produced a higher than 6% risk that her baby WILL have birth defects.
Please do open the full PDF and see graphs. The study proved that there is only a 1 in 3 times the number of ATOMS estimated to exist in the entire universe that vaccines are NOT the cause of well-over 90% of the deadly and disabling diseases and disorders suffered by Americans today.
We did not conduct a study in Brazil. What we DO know, is that microcephaly ONLY happens in babies born to mothers who are vaccinated during the pregnancy.
The Control Group "Full Report" (as well as the shorter "Summary" paper) which is referenced, cited, and linked in the published paper, goes into detail about birth defects - including this specific condition.
So you surveyed 1,482 "entirely unvaccinated" people in the United States between April 2019 and June 2020, and calculated that 832,521 people in the United States were entirely unvaccinated- out of over 330,000,000 total people in the United States. And you did not find microcephaly among the 1,482 "entirely unvaccinated" people in the United States. Correct? And this somehow has something to do with the cluster of around 4,000 cases of microcephaly in Brazil 2015/2016 with the clear link to the growth inhibitor Pyriproxyfen? I'm just trying to understand what you're saying.
Sure, vaccines are bad, but what you have presented doesn't even start to rule out Pyriproxyfen causing microcephaly in Brazil.
I never once claimed that our study produced anything specific to Brazil. I mentioned that the ONLY case of microcephaly that turned up was in a child who's mother was vaccinated during pregnancy. It only lends a tiny detail to the picture, and you can make what you wish of it.
Our study also showed that mothers who get vaccinated during pregnancy increase their baby's risk of all birth defects massively, from 0.29% up to over 6% risk. Before they started blaming a virus for the shrunken baby-brains, they were already knee deep in the pregnancy vaccine campaign in Brazil. I strongly suspect the vaccines were the actual cause. And the big pharma "solution?" MORE vaccines for pregnant women.
I am not trying to claim I have any more data that what I have specifically pointed to. And I never tried to claim I had "ruled out" anything at all with the Control Group study. Just pointing to data that I do have. People are free to make of it what they will.
More governments trying to poison their populations and getting kick backs from chemical manufacturers, just like DDT & polio. When will people realise that it's not viruses that are the threat, it's governments. Governments are responsible for more deaths any other cause.
I don't know who anll influenced Brazil to add a growth inhibitor to drinking water. Certainly the WHO played a major role here. The US supported the "blame a virus" tactic afterwards, but I don't know if any US interests were involved in poisoning drinking water.
There is always an explanation that undermines the propaganda. In this case once again, direct poisoning by governments. Reminiscent of the polio scam.
Other potential causes would be the whole cell DPT shot administered 10-12 months before the microcephaly cases.
Looks like Brazil began DTP vaccines in Nov 2014. 2014 was also the year Pyriproxyfen started. So was it one, the other, or both? This study in the US 2007-2013 didn't show an increase in Microcephaly risk with DPT vaccines during pregnancy. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2576582 That doesn't mean they weren't injected them with the exact same ingredients in Brazil that they were in the US. It doesn't mean that you can exclude DPT vaccine potential cause of microcephaly if the vaccine was taken prior to pregnancy. I'm just trying to figure it out. Data and statistics are tricky. I know DPT vaccines are bad about causing Autism.
In the nationwide Control Group study of entirely unvaccinated (post birth) across 48 states, we had ONE case of microcephaly, and the mother of this child HAD been vaccinated DURING the pregnancy. In those who had never been exposed to vaccines during the pregnancy, there were ZERO cases of this condition. In fact, the overall birth defect rate in those without exposure to pregnancy vaccines came in at 0.29% (from all OTHER possible causes).
The national average for birth defects in the U.S. is just over 3%, in a nation where 50% of all pregnancies are vaccinated. In the Control Group study, we found slightly over 6% of babies born to mothers who were vaccinated during the pregnancy had birth defects.
Basically, if the mother vaccinates during the pregnancy, she's produced a higher than 6% risk that her baby WILL have birth defects.
Which study was this?
Here is a link to the peer-reviewed and published version:
https://ijvtpr.com/index.php/IJVTPR/article/view/40
Please do open the full PDF and see graphs. The study proved that there is only a 1 in 3 times the number of ATOMS estimated to exist in the entire universe that vaccines are NOT the cause of well-over 90% of the deadly and disabling diseases and disorders suffered by Americans today.
To be clear, are you saying that vaccines were the cause of the cluster of microcephaly in Brazil 2015/2016? I don't see any discussion of that in the referenced article. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/365417868_Health_versus_Disorder_Disease_and_Death_Unvaccinated_Persons_Are_Incommensurably_Healthier_than_Vaccinated/fulltext/6374729e2f4bca7fd064130c/Health-versus-Disorder-Disease-and-Death-Unvaccinated-Persons-Are-Incommensurably-Healthier-than-Vaccinated.pdf?origin=publication_detail&_tp=eyJjb250ZXh0Ijp7ImZpcnN0UGFnZSI6InB1YmxpY2F0aW9uIiwicGFnZSI6InB1YmxpY2F0aW9uRG93bmxvYWQiLCJwcmV2aW91c1BhZ2UiOiJwdWJsaWNhdGlvbiJ9fQ
We did not conduct a study in Brazil. What we DO know, is that microcephaly ONLY happens in babies born to mothers who are vaccinated during the pregnancy.
The Control Group "Full Report" (as well as the shorter "Summary" paper) which is referenced, cited, and linked in the published paper, goes into detail about birth defects - including this specific condition.
So you surveyed 1,482 "entirely unvaccinated" people in the United States between April 2019 and June 2020, and calculated that 832,521 people in the United States were entirely unvaccinated- out of over 330,000,000 total people in the United States. And you did not find microcephaly among the 1,482 "entirely unvaccinated" people in the United States. Correct? And this somehow has something to do with the cluster of around 4,000 cases of microcephaly in Brazil 2015/2016 with the clear link to the growth inhibitor Pyriproxyfen? I'm just trying to understand what you're saying.
Sure, vaccines are bad, but what you have presented doesn't even start to rule out Pyriproxyfen causing microcephaly in Brazil.
https://or.childrenshealthdefense.org/wp-content/uploads/Statistical-Evaluation-of-Health-Outcomes-in-the-Unvaccinated.pdf
I never once claimed that our study produced anything specific to Brazil. I mentioned that the ONLY case of microcephaly that turned up was in a child who's mother was vaccinated during pregnancy. It only lends a tiny detail to the picture, and you can make what you wish of it.
Our study also showed that mothers who get vaccinated during pregnancy increase their baby's risk of all birth defects massively, from 0.29% up to over 6% risk. Before they started blaming a virus for the shrunken baby-brains, they were already knee deep in the pregnancy vaccine campaign in Brazil. I strongly suspect the vaccines were the actual cause. And the big pharma "solution?" MORE vaccines for pregnant women.
I am not trying to claim I have any more data that what I have specifically pointed to. And I never tried to claim I had "ruled out" anything at all with the Control Group study. Just pointing to data that I do have. People are free to make of it what they will.
More governments trying to poison their populations and getting kick backs from chemical manufacturers, just like DDT & polio. When will people realise that it's not viruses that are the threat, it's governments. Governments are responsible for more deaths any other cause.
And "polio" caused by DDT? Need a va666ine for that too.
“ZIKA CAUSES MICROCEPHALY, WE MUST HAVE A VACCINE FOR IT!!”
America got them to do this.
Am I right, am I?
I don't know who anll influenced Brazil to add a growth inhibitor to drinking water. Certainly the WHO played a major role here. The US supported the "blame a virus" tactic afterwards, but I don't know if any US interests were involved in poisoning drinking water.
Inquiring minds want to know!
also in flea foggers.
There is always an explanation that undermines the propaganda. In this case once again, direct poisoning by governments. Reminiscent of the polio scam.