The virus / no virus debate is alive and well thanks in large part to the recent videos by Drs. Mark and Sam Bailey in their video Farewell to Virology 2. Opinions are across the board but everyone is taking a position. I’m still on the fence on whether or not there are particles that can be described as “viruses.” The Baileys have
"Anyway, I don’t pretend to understand all that stuff. But I don’t think this stuff was isolated from human blood. If these labs had isolated a virus from human blood, it would probably be huge international news."
And they would just say "we isolated the virus from human blood."
Instead of ummm, uhhh, bullshitbullshit...
Also noticing...
GeneGPS® and VectorGPS®
Sure sounds a lot like GENE-Radar.
The platform from Nanobiosym. The company in which Foster Coulson is a shareholder.
Definitely has nothing to do with The Wellness Company though. Because TWC is TOTALLY different.
I have yet to watch Ahmad's podcast with Malone...not something I look forward to really, so thanks for suffering through Charles. Did he not mention Rancourt's thesis? Deni's "science" seems to directly contradict Malone's "science." I do find it interesting that our early treatment heroes have no bones about referencing Deni's 17 million dead from injection number but fail to mention the bigger finding that our modern understanding of a circulating virus was impossible based on excess mortality data....
"Anyway, I don’t pretend to understand all that stuff. But I don’t think this stuff was isolated from human blood. If these labs had isolated a virus from human blood, it would probably be huge international news."
And they would just say "we isolated the virus from human blood."
Instead of ummm, uhhh, bullshitbullshit...
Also noticing...
GeneGPS® and VectorGPS®
Sure sounds a lot like GENE-Radar.
The platform from Nanobiosym. The company in which Foster Coulson is a shareholder.
Definitely has nothing to do with The Wellness Company though. Because TWC is TOTALLY different.
I have yet to watch Ahmad's podcast with Malone...not something I look forward to really, so thanks for suffering through Charles. Did he not mention Rancourt's thesis? Deni's "science" seems to directly contradict Malone's "science." I do find it interesting that our early treatment heroes have no bones about referencing Deni's 17 million dead from injection number but fail to mention the bigger finding that our modern understanding of a circulating virus was impossible based on excess mortality data....
He mentioned it and Malone said that Rancourt had found mortality and not morbidity, or vice versa.