I don’t think so, after listening to Dr. Mark Bailey on Housatonic Live.
If you have a youtube account, you can subscribe to Housatonic Live here. Housatonic Live. The full video is here. It’s a fascinating interview about Dr. Bailey’s essay “Farewell to Virology (1).” I really recommend that you watch the whole thing. Also please support both Mark’s reporting and the Bailey’s research.
I used to think that bacteria caused pneumonia until Dr. Mark Bailey explained it. I’ll paraphrase what I think he’s saying, but of course listen to him first. (And I’m going to go into the COVID protocols a bit later, so be forewarned. I didn’t set out to go off on the tangent to the extent I did, but it’s hard for me to have a discussion on bacterial pneumonia without talking about it).
This is my understanding. Bacteria doesn’t cause pneumonia per se. It’s not like an infection. Bacteria feeds on dead lung tissue. Something has to damage the lung tissue first. In the video above Dr. Bailey uses an example of cold air causing lung damage. And that makes a lot of sense to me, because I’m sure that pneumonia cases increase in the winter.
It also fits with evolutionary theory. I don’t like to talk about race, but we know that humans have evolved in different ways due to different climates. Humans who lived in northern climates for many generations evolved to have longer nasal passages to preheat and moisten air before it reaches our throat and lungs. I’m assuming pneumonia played a role in the evolution of our noses, much like the difference in levels of sunlight played a role in pigment levels in our skin. The theory being by preheating and moistening the air we breathe more, the less lung damage there would be, leading to less pneumonia.
The way Dr. Bailey explains it, the bacteria are a clean up crew. They are always present. When they have dead tissue to feed on, they multiply rapidly. They don’t cause the pneumonia in the first place. They are a natural response. We live in an ecosystem. The excretions of certain bacteria, however, can cause inflammation associated with pneumonia. They can certainly be toxic and deadly.
The way I see it, as long as you’re coughing out much of the byproducts of your dead lung tissues and the bacterial byproducts, the bacteria serves a good purpose. Your coughing and fever symptoms would probably their course and you would be fine with nice clean lungs. It’s one of those things we evolved with. These bacteria are always around. We are always breathing them in. They only become problematic in high concentrations.
And here is the COVID part. We just can’t keep ignoring what has happened and is still going on in the world with these satanic and evil protocols. They are not based on science or medicine, not to cure anyway.
One place bacteria in the lungs becomes extremely problematic and deadly, I’m afraid, is in the “COVID” protocols. Patients are diagnosed with “COVID pneumonia,” based on their symptoms and a meaningless PCR test.
Not only do hospitals take exactly the wrong steps to treat bacterial pneumonia, assuming it was problematic enough to treat with antibiotics, they also create bacterial pneumonia where it was not initially present.
Hospitals put “COVID” patients on ventilators to receive Federal subsidies. They suppress the immune system severely with opioids to “synchronize” the patient with the ventilator. They force cold dry air enriched with oxygen into the lungs with ventilators, killing lung tissue.
The patients can’t cough out the bacteria with the masks on their faces in their opioid-induced near-comatose states.
The bacteria bloom and release toxins, contributing in large part to the insanely high death rates on ventilators that have been reported.
It’s not science. It’s not medicine. It’s evil. It’s every bit as evil as the Holocaust in Germany in the 1930s-1940s. And if you want to know how good people went along with it in German then, just look around you today. If you want to know why they didn’t do something then, ask yourself what you are doing now.
I would also like to highlight the Substack of Jane333, who writes that “We breathe air not oxygen.” Her premise, I believe, is that oxygen dries out and kills lung tissue.
Charles Wright
"The way I see it, as long as you’re coughing out much of the byproducts of your dead lung tissues and the bacterial byproducts, the bacteria serves a good purpose."
This ^^^^^
Last week I had food poisoning. I sat on the toilet for hours pooping out the toxic crap that I ingested in my body. Once all the poop was gone, I started to poop out blood.
Oh the horror! Most people have been taught that anytime one poops out blood it is cancerous and you HAVE TO go to the hospital/doctor right away. No questions asked.
I went on the dead internet and researched "pooping blood" and "food poisoning." Surprisingly I didn't find much, a few articles said food poisoning can cause blood in one's stool. That was it.
But why would food poisoning cause blood in one's stool?
What is the body doing? I finally found one article that said bloody stools after food poisoning is the body's way of discharging the poison from the intestines. The intestines are lined with blood and mucous (to help the poop/food slide through) and when you have food poisoning the intestines will shed blood and mucous (via bloody stools) to get rid of the poison.
Sounds logical.
I am back to normal poops after a week (knock on wood).
Made me get to thinking that maybe the whole "coughing and pooping blood is cancer, and you are going to die tomorrow" scare tactics from the medical industrial complex may be false, and perhaps the body is just trying to get rid of toxins.
Or maybe I will be dead tomorrow. Oh well, no one gets out alive.
germ theory has long been weak science