Dr. Malone's Patents are also "Contaminated" with SV40. Shouldn't the medical community discuss it?
Don’t you think that an honest concerned reporter would discuss Robert Malone’s patents with SV40 at this point?? Steve Kirsch hosted an interview with Kevin McKernan, Byram Bridle and Chris Martenson on Oct 22.
After Kariko and Weismann were awared the Nobel Prize, Byram Bridle expressed his discontent with the snub of Robert Malone in his Substack.
Dr. Robert Malone is demonstrably (via patents and publications) an original inventor of the foundational technology used to make the COVID-19 shots. It is strange that tweaking of the technology in a harmful way was recognized over the foundational technology itself.
I agree with Bridle that the Nobel Prize should have been awarded to Robert Malone, but set that aside for a minute.
Consider this. Not only does Robert Malone have the “foundation technology” of the mRNA vaccines, he also makes multiple references to SV40 in patents. Why would Kirsch, Bridle, McKernan, and Martenson not think to mention that the man with the foundation technology had also made multiple references to SV40, the very same topic that they were discussing?
The hypocrisy and bias is overwhelming.
It’s a really big deal. Ever hear of “Turbo Cancer?” I’m sure many of you have.
The Salk Institute, founded by Jonas Salk, has been “Ground Zero” for the vaccine scam in the United States. Polio was not caused by a virus.
Polio was not caused by a Virus, nor cured by a Vaccine
This is a summary of literature on the truth of Polio. This summary has a lot of “cut and paste” of original sources. It’s my belief that you should read the original sources to learn the truth. A quick summary: The polio virus never caused the symptoms associated with "polio." In the early 20th century "polio" was caused by lead and arsenic sprayin…
Just for kicks. Someone ask Malone, Kirsch, McCullough, Brindle, McKernan, and Martensen if “vaccines cured polio” is a lie. See what they say. It’s a litmus test for me. One who put down the Kool-Aid: Pierre Kory. Nice job. I actually think he read my article.
Pictured below: Jonas Salk holding some of his SV40 goo that caused cancer.
Cancer.
“Simian virus 40 (SV40) is a monkey virus which was accidentally administered to humans, in the years 1955-'63, through contaminated poliovirus vaccines.” Bullshit. The same type of crowd today says it’s a contamination with COVID vaccines. Bullshit. The inclusion of SV40 is an intentional strategy to create cancer, just like it was in 1955-1963.
I’m sure many of you have heard Robert Malone talk about his background over and over. First he started in computer science in 1981, then went to Salk where he studied under Inder Verma. What did he leave out?
Cancer.
As an undergraduate, 1983-1984, Robert Malone was involved in “research” that created cancer. First he was given “President’s Undergraduate Fellowship Grant for Investigation of Oncogene Expression in Breast Tumor Tissue: 1983-1984.” Then, he co-authored “Hyperplastic and neoplastic changes in the mammary glands of feral mice free of endogenous mouse mammary tumor virus provirus,” October 1984.
Then he went to Verma, who taught him the dark art of gene deletion. As Robert Malone said: “the other part of Inder’s lab was focused on gene expression, that’s the control of transcription and etc. So turning genes on and off.” Which genes were you turning off?
By 2007, Malone’s mentor Inder Verma had received a USAMRIID grant to screen for genes that turned of the BRCA1 Tumor Suppression Function. But again, what were they working on- turning genes on and off- when Malone was at Salk?
“Turbo cancer” today likely has a great deal to do with turning off the BRCA1 tumor suppressor gene. You can read more about that here.
Dr. Mikolaj Rasjek warns of possible long-term Cancer effects of COVID Vaccines
Dr. Mikolaj Rasjek is a genomics expert who received his doctorate degree (PhD) in biochemistry and his Bachelors in genetics from the University of Alberta in Canada. He is the founder of Merogenomics Inc., whose mission statement is: "to make the benefits of genome sequencing accessible to the general public."
Now BRCA1, if you mutate that gene, it’s one of the highest predispositional mutations for cancer that you can have, is mutations in this particular gene, precisely because BRCA genes code for proteins that are involved in fixing DNA damage, such as fixing DNA that’s sheared in half.
So this is clearly news of great significance, and it should not be taken lightly. It should be reinvestigated, reconfirmed…"
So thanks to Dr. Rasjek, I’ve known of the role of disrupting BRCA1 for some time, over a year, as my reporting and his are generally ignored. But, the report of SV40 is a relatively new development. Turbo Cancer is a two part strategy, I think. Oncogenes such as SV40 make the cancers grow, and gene deletion or gene suppression turns off the genes that fight tumors. I think Robert Malone knows plenty about both oncogenes and gene deletion or suppression.
So by 1989, when Malone quit Salk and went to Vical, I don’t think that his first patent application mentioning SV40 is something that should be ignored by the medical community. This one was filed March 21, 1989. (If you can find the original patent 1989 patent application please share).
At the very least, don’t you think Malone would have been aware that SV40 caused cancer by 1989? Shouldn’t he have put inthe notes of this patent application that SV40 caused cancer and that it should not be used? Instead he called it “suitable.”
So what do you think? Do you think that Malone’s patents containing SV40 should be a topic of discussion in the medical community, or is it no big deal? Should they continue to ignore “Turbo Cancer” and the “Science” behind it?
Charles Wright
Considering the toll of the “miracle” mRNA technology reported over the last 4 years, I would be ashamed to admit my contribution to this invention. What is so brilliant about an invention which we cannot make harmless or - as a minimum - neutral?
The Nature functions perfectly without all those patents, PhDs, Nobels or state funding. So far, nothing of human “invention” improved anything in the Nature. Not a bit. We only improve our lifestyle, in search of more laziness or more money. But it’s all selective efforts aimed at isolated snapshots of life. We have never contributed anything positive to the Nature at large.
From a broad perspective, all “science” is a byproduct of the greed trip. We are truly, selflessly not interested in improving human condition. The very existence of patents, copyright and company secrecy proves this. In the meantime, we have mastered the art of creating never-ending money machines at the expense of those most in need, most helpless, and most unrepresented anywhere near decision makers. The war against cancer is the best example. Billions pumped year by year into startups, inventions, experiments, with the ultimate goal of producing zero results. Extremely successful.
Pieces of information that are now surfacing in relation to human health worldwide slowly make up the whole puzzle. And the topmost secret is not about unimportant scientists or their achievements. The most guarded secret is that ALL science is only a guesswork. It’s all concepts, theories and random “it’s working” moments. All of it. From bricks and concrete to genes and immunology, it’s all only theories and dogmas. It can’t be any different. We will never reach the ultimate “How” of the Nature, just because our perception is incredibly limited and fragmentary even without money. When you add funding, the mind goes amok and activates all possible biases to perfect the agenda. It’s always like this. We cannot change it, because our whole wiring is only functional on a very limited time and space plane. The sooner all those fancy researchers accept it, the more chances we have to survive.
In fairness to Kevin, he is not calling the SV40 "accidental contaminant". In testimonies that I have been in together with Kevin he is very clear about how bad it is and that there is no reason to have it at all, only bad reasons, and that there is evidence of heavy lifting being done to conceal this component. Contamination can be purposeful or accidental. We are calling for immediate stop of these injections and proper investigation.