Dr. Sam Bailey asks: Are viruses pathogens, or particles resulting from a breakdown of diseased tissue?

In June, I wrote an a article based on an article from Dr. Robert Young. It was about the debate in the 19th century between chemist/biologists Louis Pasteur and Pierre Béchamp and Louis Pasteur, over the “chicken or egg” debate of virology, as I call it. Which came first, the disease or the virus? They called the old debate “pleomorphism versus monomorphism.” The issue is whether viruses are cause by degrading and diseased cells, or whether viruses infect cells and cause them to become infected. I thought Young’s article was very well-founded an an excellent debate starter.

Recently, Denis Rancourt on Twitter published a video from Dr. Sam Bailey.

Dr. Sam Bailey rethinking Viruses and Disease

Central to this tenant is the accepted wisdom that viruses, defined as viruses, defined as replicating protein-coated pieces of genetic material, either DNA or RNA, exist as independent entities in the real world, and are able to act as pathogens. That is the so-called particle with a protein coating and genetic interior is commonly believed to infect living tissues and cells, replicate inside these living tissues, damage the tissues as it makes its way out, and in doing so, is also believed to create disease and sometimes death in its host.

The so-called viral theory of disease causation. The alleged virus particles are then said to be able to transmit to other hosts causing disease in them as well. After a century of experimentation as well as untold billions of dollars spent towards this “War Against Viruses,” we must ask whether it’s time to reconsider this theory.

For several decades, many doctors and scientists have been putting forth the case that commonly accepted understanding of viruses was based on fundamental misconception. Fundamentally, rather than seeing viruses as independent, exogenous, pathogenic entities, these doctors and scientists have suggested they are simply the ordinary and inevitable breakdown particles of stressed and/or dead and dying tissues. They are therefore not pathogens. They are not harmful to humans or other living beings.

As Murray Gell-Mann (a “Q-level” scientist of the JASON program) said, “wet streets cause rain.”

Here is a link to a paper that the video is based on: Dr. Sam Bailey.com

One thing I really like about the video is that they challenge their virology counterparts to prove their theories. They propose test methods. It is a debate that can be settled with scientific testing, according to them.

There are quite a few signatories to the Settling the Virus Debate Statement.

Thomas Cowan, MD; Mark Bailey, MD; Samantha Bailey, MD; Jitendra Banjara, MSc; Kelly Brogan, MD; Kevin Corbett, PhD; Mufassil Dingankar, BHMS; Michael Donio, MS; Jordan Grant, MD; Andrew Kaufman, MD; Valentina Kiseleva, MD; Christine Massey, MSc; Paul McSheehy, PhD; Prof. Timothy Noakes, MD; Sachin Pethkar, BAMS; Saeed Qureshi, PhD; Stefano Scoglio, PhD; Mike Stone, BEXSc ; Amandha Vollmer, NDoc; Michael Yeadon, PhD.

Dr. Robert Young was not a signatory, but I imagine that he concurs.

I still have some questions, because I’m sure that disease has spread at times in the history of mankind, the most obvious one being Smallpox. I believe that Smallpox is bacteria, not a virus. I’m also sure that some viruses have been intentionally falsely associated with disease, the most obvious being Polio. I would like to see a concerted effort to go through every Pandemic or plague in the history of mankind and describe them better, especially if the test model proposal of Bailey et al substantiates their claims.

In any case the test proposal of Bailey et al would be a very informative one, and I hope it happens very soon.

Charles Wright