On November 14, 2021, Dr. Milojak Rasjek described the mechanism by which vaccines could potentially cause cancer based on research, based on his analysis of SARS-CoV-2 Spike Impairs DNA Damage Repair and Inhibits V(D)J Recombination In Vitro, which was published by Jiang and Mei on October 13, 2020.
Dr. Rasjak said:
"Now what they discovered is that once the spike protein enters the nucleus, it actually inhibits proper fixing of broken, damaged DNA. Specifically, damage of DNA where you have double-stranded break, meaning really you break both strands of the DNA. You shear the DNA in half. You break it in half.
And the way it does negatively impact how the DNA is being fixed is by somehow, it’s still unknown, somehow interfering with how BRCA1 protein is supposed to be used in fixing the DNA damage.
Now BRCA1, if you mutate that gene, it’s one of the highest pre-dispositional mutations for cancer that you can have, is mutations in this particular gene, precisely because BRCA genes code for proteins that are involved in fixing DNA damage, such as fixing DNA that’s sheared in half.
So this is clearly news of great significance, and it should not be taken lightly. It should be reinvestigated, reconfirmed…"
On November 19, 2021, I summarized Dr. Rasjek's comments as Dr. Mikolaj Rasjek warns of possible long-term Cancer effects of COVID Vaccines, and added some other information on the BRCA1 proteins from the National Cancer Institute:
The National Cancer Institute's website says that problems with the BRCA1 protein are well-known to cause Cancer, especially in women: "A woman’s lifetime risk of developing breast and/or ovarian cancer is markedly increased if she inherits a harmful variant in BRCA1 or BRCA2." The NCI says that the likelihood of women developing breast cancer for those with a BRCA1 "variant" increases from 13% in the general population to 55%-72%.
The NCI reports the risk of developing ovarian cancer increases from 1.2% in the general population to 39%-44% with abnormalities in BRCA1. (These figures on breast and ovarian cancer were based on a lifespan of 70-80 years). These cancers also develop at younger ages: "People who have inherited a harmful variant in BRCA1 and BRCA2 also tend to develop cancer at younger ages than people who do not have such a variant."
Many other cancers associated with BRCA1/BRCA2 abnormalities are discussed in the NCI website including fallopian tube cancer, primary peritoneal cancer, prostate cancer, pancreatic cancer, and Fanconi anemia.
On February 10, 2022, Dr. Robert Malone gave an interview to Tucker Carlson and reported that Theresa Long, a whistleblower at the Department of Defense, had told him that the DoD's Medical Epidemiology Database showed a large increase in cancer resulting from the vaccines.
That video clip is available here: Video Clip Robert Malone DoD Whistleblower Cancer Data
Dr. Robert Malone: "Massive increases in 2021 relative to 2020 and preceding years of multiple hundreds of percent up to 1000 percent in a variety of adverse events, which is to say diseases, that are suspected of being associated with the vaccine administration."
Tucker Carlson: "And serious adverse effects?"
Dr. Robert Malone: "Yeah, like cancer, heart attack, stroke, infertility. It goes... it is stunning to me, and as I have said before, I take no pleasure in finding the things that I've been raising alarms about are those things that are popping up in this signal. Ryan Cole has been observing increases incidents of cancers and odd behaviors of cancers. To get in the nuance, cells replicating at a much higher level in a field of cancer cells than would normally be seen in that type of cancer. And he's been observing this, but it's all anecdotal. You know, this is just what's coming across his microscope.
Tucker Carlson: "Since you are one of the people in the country who understand how these vaccines work, do you think it's plausible that they increase the risk of cancer?"
Dr. Robert Malone: "Yes."
Tucker Carlson: "You do?"
Dr. Robert Malone: "Yes."
Recently Jessica Rose on Twitter has reported a massive increase in cancer reported to the VAERS system- Specifically leukemia, lymphoma, bladder and breast cancer. Rose has also written that “Genotoxicity and Carcinogenicity studies were NOT done.” There are a lot of good references in this article. “I am just almost without words at where we are. There is no excuse not to be questioning this from all angles at this point.”
Because I previously reported in November that breast cancer was most likely to occur as a result of the damage caused by the vaccines to the BRCA1 protein, I feel like this VAERS data accumulated by Rose is confirmation of the cancer causing mechanism of action described in great detail by Dr. Milojak Rasjek.
I realize that many in the medical community will still be skeptical about the data and say that the cause and effect link has not been established to their satisfaction.
I do not feel the need to prove that a murder is a murder to the murderer in the murderer’s courtroom. I believe that playing by their rules is a futile and senseless effort. When the Jews were on the trains to Auschwitz, would an appeal to the guards on the train have done any good?
In hindsight, if I was on that train, I’d try to rally support to take the train over. I prove things to myself beyond a reasonable doubt, then go with it, and tell the usual “can’t prove it” crowd to go to hell and that they are not the judge on what has and has not been proven. There’s no way this much cancer shows up in VAERS after a brilliant doctor explained exactly how it would happen, without this data being a confirmation, as far as I’m concerned. I’ve been on this train since November.
In any case, please spread the word. It works. Change someone’s mind today. The vaccines should be banned immediately. Do not take them. If you want the basis, ask Rasjak and Rose. I’m just calling it like it is.
Charles Wright
POST SCRIPT:
A subscriber who has their own Substack, Doorless Carp, shared the following:
”I'm now up to 28 potential immune suppressive, pro tumor pathways. 29 if you include TMPRSS2 binding, which otherwise acts as a tumor suppressor. A couple of Substacks relevant to the discussion:”
And..
END
I'm now up to 28 potential immune suppressive, pro tumor pathways. 29 if you include TMPRSS2 binding, which otherwise acts as a tumor suppressor. A couple of Substacks relevant to the discussion:
Tumor Suppressor Protein p53 & BRCA related cancers
Experimental gene therapy transfections and public health implications
https://doorlesscarp953.substack.com/p/s2-subunit-of-sars-ncov-2-interacts?s=w
Spike protein (inc vax) induced immunodeficiency & carcinogenesis megathread #20: MiR-200, a new star miRNA in human cancer
https://doorlesscarp953.substack.com/p/spike-protein-inc-vax-induced-immunodeficiency-bcf/comments?s=w
And “monkeypox”