What sort of lessons should we take from the Plandemic? Should we accept everything that Scientists say, even though they clearly lied to us about pretty much everything associated with COVID-19? The latest round of Scientists who are critics can all be trusted 100% to tell us everything we need to know? What a joke, especially when it comes to McKernon.
Whatever your take on viruses is, there’s just no way that an engineered virus traveled around the world infecting and killing people via human-to-human transmission. That doesn’t mean that they necessarily don’t exist, it just means that they probably can’t build something that spreads by that method, unless perhaps you inject it.
The problem with people like Anandamide (McKernone) is that they will not call out those people who have committed homicide in the name of COVID. I don’t know if it’s some sort of unwritten code that scientists and doctors consider themselves some sort of protected class that should be allowed to commit murder, and they should never criticize another professional no matter how obvious and henious the crime, or if there is some other more serious form of a conflict of interest. In any case, if Anandamide won’t admit that people were murdered by hospitals in the name of COVID to simulate the spread of a deadly virus, then he is either a fool, a liar, or has some conflict of interest that involves protecting the murderers.
Instead he chooses to describe those who question science on viruses as “Cult” members. It’s not just an academic debate. If viruses don’t exist in the format which Science claims, it has serious implactions for the massive criminal enterprise that is virology/vaccinology- not just this Plandemic either.
Interestingly, he seems to define “viruses” a bit different from the standard definition.
We know viruses exist.(coding RNAs).
Missing a protein coat aren’t you?
Sounds a lot like mRNA to me. mRNA the real code for disease apparently. The real weaponized viruses, the real disease producing mechanism. In the human body, according to evolutionary theory, cells would generate beneficial “viruses” or mRNA compounds. I doubt there are naturally occurring exogenous microorganisms that “invade” you and “hijack” your cells. But you can coat it in lipid nanoparticles to trick your cells and inject it. As your cells break down, they produce messengers to create antibodies in response to some sort of toxin or other damage. It took science to break the code and create disease with it. Again, in Malone et al’s 1984 paper, the mice WITH the mouse mammary tumor virus were the ones that were better able to resist cancer after they gave the mice a cancer-inducing chemical.
Hyperplastic and neoplastic changes in the mammary glands of feral mice free of endogenous mouse mammary tumor virus provirus
J Natl Cancer Inst.1984 Oct;73(4):971-82.
So I don’t completely disagree with McKernon, but unfortunately his Cult status prevents him from telling us the whole truth. Because McKernon is in a Cult- the Cult of Science.
McKernon was the one who identified the SV40 DNA fragments in the Pfizer vaccines. Great job. Thing is, that points to Robert Malone, as I’ve reported extensively. McKernon won’t do that. Why not?
The Cult of Money. The Cult of Murder. The Cult of Science. The Cult of CIA Fear.
I have no problem calling any of them out. It’s clear that the public has been lied to, and that we just haven’t figured out all the details yet.
If McKernon wants to do something constructive besides calling people who question the Scientists who have killed untold millions, he can explain the mRNA “Turbo Cancer” technology. (But Malone wouldn’t like it).
Someone commented that we don’t know who our enemies are. I do. You’re either 100% opposed to every bit of this, or you are complicit to some extent. Whatever the problem is exactly with McKernon, Kirsch, and everyone else in this saga that won’t state that hospitals have committed murder in the name of COVID to simulate the spread of an engineered virus is, and won’t call out Scientists like Malone, I don’t know exactly- but I do know this much. They are obfuscating the truth by not telling the whole truth to protect the guilty, and they are my enemy.
P.S. Obelisks are first known to have existed in Ancient Egypt, monuments to the Sun god Ra. (As in ray- ray of light), and probably existed before that in Mesopotamia before the Great Flood. When the CIA was formed as a merger of the SS (Karl Wolff) and OSS (Allen Dulles), they called it Operation Sunrise. The Operation Sunrise meetings took place in Northern Italy. Rome has 13 Obelisks, including one which was taken from Ancient Egypt.
“Ra” (Ray) is on the back of the US dollar bill over a “Freemason” pyramid (of 3 sides, with acute angles). The Washington Monument is of course an obelisk. (Just a bunch of “Freemason” trivia). I find it suiting that McKernon would use an obelisk as a proof of a virus, and say that anyone who questions accepted theories of virology that have obviously been fabricated to a large extent is in a “Cult.”
Charles Wright
My comment from:
https://anandamide.substack.com/p/obelisks-and-viroids-kryptonite-for/comment/50138493
Been around these gene theory nut jobs for twenty years in the Ivy League- the high priests of science.
These people soak up vast amount of public monies and produce nothing but one unproven crank postulation after the next. They avoid biological reality at all costs.
How about we get McCullough and McKernan out in the open in a public forum and have a debate on these matters. They avoid the light of such discussions as it would expose them for the phrauds that they are.
"We missed these in biology for a very long time, I think largely because DNA sequencing technologies didn't handle these hairpins very well."
"This was all computational searching that discovered this."
- K McKernan
But not in the real world Kevin. Sorry man, your electronmicroscopy comic book isn't reality. At least there's a pretty-in-purple spirally picture though.
"In the case of viroids we typically get pulled into studying the ones that cause catastrophic crop yield issues."
"There's gotta be an evolutionary reason these persist."
This guy knows less than zero about agriculture. I would fancy that he would advocate for Biotech agribusiness though I don't know that for sure- can you confirm Kevin?
In all but exceptional circumstances- drought, floods, chemical saturation, volcanic eruptions etc.....catastrophic crop yields has all to do with poor agricultural practices- chemical poisoning, mono-crop industrial agriculture impacts, soil erosion, soil depletion and so forth.
"The point I'm making for the listeners is this isn't just all you know pie in the sky science these concepts are being applied to some therapies and the therapies I've mentioned so far are safe and effective so I don't want people listening to think that every single piece of RNA is bad that comes from a pharmaceutical company."
- P McCullough
McCullough gives us the classic baby/bathwater trope. Staged interviews do not suit this guy. Oh and BTW only paid subscribers get in the door. That alone should tell people these characters don't want to face the public- only their captive fan club.
Their latest interview was rife with a-priori assumptions and circular reasoning. These guys are salesman for the mRNA gravy train upon which their fortunes rest.
Charles - as many of us have observed, many "chaos agents" were served up to us early in this Malthusian Experiment, most with excellent medical/research/academic credentials. and it has taken us several years to deduce that their main objective was to create division by muddying the waters.
Thank you for providing a litmus test for people to use in discerning whom to trust, and whom to condemn.