I do agree with you. How can we trust people who keep on telling lies? Even if they say, here and there, little pieces of truths?
Either they are controlled opposition or they are unable to acknowledge that whatever they have learnt and worked with is a total lie. In both cases they are dangerous.
Nice articulation of how erstwhile credentialed and seemingly well-intentioned dark triads are serving higher masters in their roles as narrative herders and accessories to democide
Or is it how adolescent-insignificance-angst is resolved in adulthood? By exchanging weird handshakes and ancient rites with other soft heads seeking the thrill of exclusivity and secrecy from otherwise mundane and meaningless existences?
“It’s a big CULT and you’re not in it”, is perhaps what Carlin should have said, while clearly being a member of the cult of weirdly wired weirdos.
Just listened to J Jay Couey on an interview with Ryan Christian of The Last American Vagabond.
Kept thinking about exosomes and bacteria in the injections and lipid nanoparticles.
Highly recommend spending the hour or so.
As for embedded scientists and woefully keeping their heads in the sand and their jobs, I give you this review of vaxed vs. unvaxed. By the way, rumor has it that the editor who commented on this study is resigning. Hmm.
Assessment of Myocardial ¹⁸F-FDG uptake at PET/CT in Asymptomatic SARS-COV-2 vaccinated and Nonvaccinated Patients (Journal Radiology)
T. Nakahara, Y. Iwabuchi, et. Al
Measured ¹⁸F-FDG uptake with PET scans. (positron emission tomography (PET)
Study shows myocardial damages with uptake.
Included 303 nonvaxxed and 700 vaxxed.
Vaxxed had overall higher myocardial FDG uptake compared to nonvaxxed.
The uptake was observed in patients imaged in four date ranges. 1-30 days, 31-60 days. 61-120 days and 121-180 days after second vaccination, with increased ipsilateral axillary uptake in vaccinated vs. nonvaccinated patients.
Editor Emeritus, Dr. Bluemke in editorial noted "The main results...for asymptomatic patients vaccinated for COVID-19 before PET had about a 40% greater radiotracer activity in the myocardium than unvaccinated individuals. (Statistically) The P value was low, less than .0001, translated to only one time out of 10,000 would these results occur by chance."
This is suggesting that mild myocardial inflammation could be more common than expected. F-FDG uptake was higher in all vaccinated quartiles with age adjustments. Further, the myocardial SUVmax (g/ml) does not recover with time and was even above the level on the unvaccinated in the 40 patients who only received one dose.
I listened to that episode of American vagabond, I came away a bit confused as to why they were confused with the mandated vaccine harms. My take away is that they are hoping this was some large experiment and many people received saline. I’m not an avid listener to either Christian or couey, but has it not occurred to them that the mRNA technology is a well designed kill shot? And that’s the point of it!
And Ryan has spoken that the shots are bioweaponized as had David Martin. Couey got thrown out of academia for questioning the narrative and pointing out this is not a safe platform for use. He also has brought into the conversation here the virus methodology that is suspect, the no virus isolation and the concept of our dealing with exosomes.
Imo, the more skeptical scientists the better. That goes for all of us questioning everything about the climate emergency net zero platform as well.
Virology and synthetic biology feeds too many mouths! They will defend that at all cost. Plus, many in these fields equate life to their profession and position.
thank you Charles...great article - they are my enemy too - and I'm glad you didn't blame ancient Egypt - these crooks stole the emblem of Ra - like the Khazars stole the jewish religion. Secret brotherhoods are up to dirty work nowadays.
I am a cult survivor. But that was a small cult, and therefore it was easy to see. I joined that cult when I was 11 because my mother had joined. The biggest cult is "culture" which is manipulated by those who know how to manipulate en masse, and they have the money as well. Good luck trying to get people out of any cult. They are not likely to change, until something drastic happens or their needs are no longer being met by the cult. IMHO, this is the real problem of humanity. Don't forget that the WEF has said that 3/4 will die, mostly from suicide. My sense is that this could happen if the cult members start to realize they are in a cult that couldn't care less about them.
Charles - as many of us have observed, many "chaos agents" were served up to us early in this Malthusian Experiment, most with excellent medical/research/academic credentials. and it has taken us several years to deduce that their main objective was to create division by muddying the waters.
Thank you for providing a litmus test for people to use in discerning whom to trust, and whom to condemn.
I'm really interested in your stuff, Charles. It would be great if you would proofread your text and correct all the typos. Also, the pyramid on the back of the dollar has four sides, not counting the bottom, or the top where it has been sliced off. You can see that the top is a rectangle.
In any event, I remain very interested in your work.
1) a religion regarded as unorthodox or spurious (see spurious sense 2: outwardly similar or corresponding to something without having its genuine qualities)
2) great devotion to a person, idea, object, movement, or work (such as a film or book)
3) a system of religious beliefs and ritual
4) formal religious veneration: worship
5) a system for the cure of disease based on dogma set forth by its promulgator.
None of these standard dictionary meanings has any negative connotation. Isn’t science a cult? 1) It certainly has features of a religion, including hierarchy and regulated access, 2) without devotion, science would be impossible, 3) a system of beliefs (like genetic dogmas, axioms, assumptions) and ritual (like clinical trials), 4) worship as in awarding prizes, titles, special forms of address, social and scientific privileges, 5) this one goes without saying.
So, linguistically, “science” fulfills Webster’s criteria to be classified as a cult - but none of these criteria are negative or pejorative. They are simply descriptive qualities.
The problem is with everyday usage of the word “cult” as indicating something negative. But we do “cult” every day with our daily mundane life, with rituals (shaking hands, smiling, apologizing, expressing gratitude), worship of certain values or people, manifesting extreme devotion to a boss or job, or doing unorthodox things which are encouraged and rewarded (thiunk outside of the box, become a leader, cultivate team spirit).
If we accept this explanation, being a member of a cult is a great honor. Certain cults are even distinguished by insignia worn on special occasions (medals, special elements of clothing, flags) and special rituals (anthems, group practices). The Congress is an example of a special form of a cult, with all the criteria fulfilled - but there is no negative aspect to it.
Is this the Mal One Substack that you said was a doozie? I just read it…I read it as I was eating a rather tasty lunch…made me want to vomit.
How can people subscribe and read Mal One’s self aggrandizing BS ‘drivel’?
I knew out the gate what a blow hard, a ‘seriously in love with oneself’ A Hole he was…and what a Grifter…now he is latching onto the CPAC crowd. “Got horses and a Horse Farm in VA” anyone?
Also CPAC is seriously under scrutiny in my world to even allow a Grifter like Mal One to speak there! The Conservatism they are ‘selling’ is totally BOGUS.
I hope you and others understand that I meant "doozie" to mean outrageously sickening, self-serving, self-aggrandizing, and descriptive of the writing of someone who deceives himself and is trying to deceive others.
Oh I know what a ‘doozie’ is…and I whole heartedly agree with you! Just was confirming this Substack was what you were referring to…a ‘doozie’ on so many levels!
You misspelled his name at least 8 times above.
He covers a lot of ground nonetheless. Fearless too.
Charles... could you elaborate on your mention of Steve Kirsch as « your enemy » I would appreciate a clarification... thank you 🙏🏼
I do agree with you. How can we trust people who keep on telling lies? Even if they say, here and there, little pieces of truths?
Either they are controlled opposition or they are unable to acknowledge that whatever they have learnt and worked with is a total lie. In both cases they are dangerous.
This cult of RA will not stand! It's time to get MAD!!!
https://thepascorrupt.substack.com/p/get-mad-chasebutterflys
Nice articulation of how erstwhile credentialed and seemingly well-intentioned dark triads are serving higher masters in their roles as narrative herders and accessories to democide
money, power, ego, narcissism, ideology, superiority complexes, megalomania, psychopathy…
Or is it how adolescent-insignificance-angst is resolved in adulthood? By exchanging weird handshakes and ancient rites with other soft heads seeking the thrill of exclusivity and secrecy from otherwise mundane and meaningless existences?
“It’s a big CULT and you’re not in it”, is perhaps what Carlin should have said, while clearly being a member of the cult of weirdly wired weirdos.
By their omissions we shall know them…
Just listened to J Jay Couey on an interview with Ryan Christian of The Last American Vagabond.
Kept thinking about exosomes and bacteria in the injections and lipid nanoparticles.
Highly recommend spending the hour or so.
As for embedded scientists and woefully keeping their heads in the sand and their jobs, I give you this review of vaxed vs. unvaxed. By the way, rumor has it that the editor who commented on this study is resigning. Hmm.
Assessment of Myocardial ¹⁸F-FDG uptake at PET/CT in Asymptomatic SARS-COV-2 vaccinated and Nonvaccinated Patients (Journal Radiology)
T. Nakahara, Y. Iwabuchi, et. Al
Measured ¹⁸F-FDG uptake with PET scans. (positron emission tomography (PET)
Study shows myocardial damages with uptake.
Included 303 nonvaxxed and 700 vaxxed.
Vaxxed had overall higher myocardial FDG uptake compared to nonvaxxed.
The uptake was observed in patients imaged in four date ranges. 1-30 days, 31-60 days. 61-120 days and 121-180 days after second vaccination, with increased ipsilateral axillary uptake in vaccinated vs. nonvaccinated patients.
Editor Emeritus, Dr. Bluemke in editorial noted "The main results...for asymptomatic patients vaccinated for COVID-19 before PET had about a 40% greater radiotracer activity in the myocardium than unvaccinated individuals. (Statistically) The P value was low, less than .0001, translated to only one time out of 10,000 would these results occur by chance."
This is suggesting that mild myocardial inflammation could be more common than expected. F-FDG uptake was higher in all vaccinated quartiles with age adjustments. Further, the myocardial SUVmax (g/ml) does not recover with time and was even above the level on the unvaccinated in the 40 patients who only received one dose.
I listened to that episode of American vagabond, I came away a bit confused as to why they were confused with the mandated vaccine harms. My take away is that they are hoping this was some large experiment and many people received saline. I’m not an avid listener to either Christian or couey, but has it not occurred to them that the mRNA technology is a well designed kill shot? And that’s the point of it!
You should listen again.
And Ryan has spoken that the shots are bioweaponized as had David Martin. Couey got thrown out of academia for questioning the narrative and pointing out this is not a safe platform for use. He also has brought into the conversation here the virus methodology that is suspect, the no virus isolation and the concept of our dealing with exosomes.
Imo, the more skeptical scientists the better. That goes for all of us questioning everything about the climate emergency net zero platform as well.
Sticking w Kevin McCairn for now. Kind of done w Couey.
Christie Grace is a LNP expert. Was a tad shocked she blocked me for a sincere q re graphene.
Kevin is a rambler. Doesn't get to the points.
Many scientists are in their own world and don't consider other issues that can cause harm. Not enough bridging generalists.
I for one see multiple attacks and not just from the vax. Creating hypoxia from masking.
Flouridation, pharmaceuticals in public water, air geoengineering, Remdesivir, no use of HBOT, etc etc.
It was a good one and posted on JJ’s twitch.
https://m.twitch.tv/videos/2068840666
Virology and synthetic biology feeds too many mouths! They will defend that at all cost. Plus, many in these fields equate life to their profession and position.
thank you Charles...great article - they are my enemy too - and I'm glad you didn't blame ancient Egypt - these crooks stole the emblem of Ra - like the Khazars stole the jewish religion. Secret brotherhoods are up to dirty work nowadays.
I wish I knew more about Charles Wright. I bet he has a fascinating bio.
I am a cult survivor. But that was a small cult, and therefore it was easy to see. I joined that cult when I was 11 because my mother had joined. The biggest cult is "culture" which is manipulated by those who know how to manipulate en masse, and they have the money as well. Good luck trying to get people out of any cult. They are not likely to change, until something drastic happens or their needs are no longer being met by the cult. IMHO, this is the real problem of humanity. Don't forget that the WEF has said that 3/4 will die, mostly from suicide. My sense is that this could happen if the cult members start to realize they are in a cult that couldn't care less about them.
Charles - as many of us have observed, many "chaos agents" were served up to us early in this Malthusian Experiment, most with excellent medical/research/academic credentials. and it has taken us several years to deduce that their main objective was to create division by muddying the waters.
Thank you for providing a litmus test for people to use in discerning whom to trust, and whom to condemn.
The truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.
Charles - the truth is our only hope in this world-wide democide. Please keep speaking truth to power.
Well there you go Charles , batting .1000 again.
Don’t you mean batting 1.000? Which is batting 1000 rather than batting 100.
Yep. Geez. Thanks
lol. Charles is a pitcher?
I'm really interested in your stuff, Charles. It would be great if you would proofread your text and correct all the typos. Also, the pyramid on the back of the dollar has four sides, not counting the bottom, or the top where it has been sliced off. You can see that the top is a rectangle.
In any event, I remain very interested in your work.
“Cult” according to Webster:
1) a religion regarded as unorthodox or spurious (see spurious sense 2: outwardly similar or corresponding to something without having its genuine qualities)
2) great devotion to a person, idea, object, movement, or work (such as a film or book)
3) a system of religious beliefs and ritual
4) formal religious veneration: worship
5) a system for the cure of disease based on dogma set forth by its promulgator.
None of these standard dictionary meanings has any negative connotation. Isn’t science a cult? 1) It certainly has features of a religion, including hierarchy and regulated access, 2) without devotion, science would be impossible, 3) a system of beliefs (like genetic dogmas, axioms, assumptions) and ritual (like clinical trials), 4) worship as in awarding prizes, titles, special forms of address, social and scientific privileges, 5) this one goes without saying.
So, linguistically, “science” fulfills Webster’s criteria to be classified as a cult - but none of these criteria are negative or pejorative. They are simply descriptive qualities.
The problem is with everyday usage of the word “cult” as indicating something negative. But we do “cult” every day with our daily mundane life, with rituals (shaking hands, smiling, apologizing, expressing gratitude), worship of certain values or people, manifesting extreme devotion to a boss or job, or doing unorthodox things which are encouraged and rewarded (thiunk outside of the box, become a leader, cultivate team spirit).
If we accept this explanation, being a member of a cult is a great honor. Certain cults are even distinguished by insignia worn on special occasions (medals, special elements of clothing, flags) and special rituals (anthems, group practices). The Congress is an example of a special form of a cult, with all the criteria fulfilled - but there is no negative aspect to it.
Well said. Nobel Prize, Noble lie. They receive awards for that which kills and creates disease. And we're in the Cult if we question them.
No negation. Things are as they are. No change is possible with a negative attitude.
Scientism is the preferred way to refer to the cult. It has taken hold on X/Twitter.
https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/why-are-hispanics-mobilizing-around?utm_source=substack&publication_id=583200&post_id=141922722&utm_medium=email&utm_content=share&utm_campaign=email-share&triggerShare=true&isFreemail=true&r=tjy1y&open=false
Is this the Mal One Substack that you said was a doozie? I just read it…I read it as I was eating a rather tasty lunch…made me want to vomit.
How can people subscribe and read Mal One’s self aggrandizing BS ‘drivel’?
I knew out the gate what a blow hard, a ‘seriously in love with oneself’ A Hole he was…and what a Grifter…now he is latching onto the CPAC crowd. “Got horses and a Horse Farm in VA” anyone?
Also CPAC is seriously under scrutiny in my world to even allow a Grifter like Mal One to speak there! The Conservatism they are ‘selling’ is totally BOGUS.
I hope you and others understand that I meant "doozie" to mean outrageously sickening, self-serving, self-aggrandizing, and descriptive of the writing of someone who deceives himself and is trying to deceive others.
Oh I know what a ‘doozie’ is…and I whole heartedly agree with you! Just was confirming this Substack was what you were referring to…a ‘doozie’ on so many levels!