Japanese Study reports Correlation between mRNA Vaccines and Cancer, consistent with a Warning made years ago.
This article references Gibo M, Kojima S, Fujisawa A, et al. (April 08, 2024) Increased Age-Adjusted Cancer Mortality After the Third mRNA-Lipid Nanoparticle Vaccine Dose During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Japan. Cureus 16(4): e57860. doi:10.7759/cureus.57860
Getting right to the point. Some types of age-adjusted cancer mortality rates in Japan had been falling prior to the “COVID” mRNA vaccines. After the vaccines, some types of cancer broke out of their fall, reversed course, and began to rise: Ovarian, Leukemia, Prostate, and Lip and Oral cancer.
FROM FALL TO RISE
Pancreatic cancer mortality had been rising in Japan, and began to rise at a higher rate.
FROM RISE TO RISE AT HIGHER RATE
Some types of cancer were falling, and stayed within a downward-sloping range. Lung, Colorectal, Stomach and Liver. (Although Lung was close to breaking out of its range).
These results were consistent with the report I wrote in November 2021 summarizing the report of Dr. Mikolaj Rasjek.
A bit more background: Dr. Rasjek discussed a study published in Sweden in Oct 2021 which demonstrated that these spike proteins can penetrate the nucleus of human DNA and cause damage to DNA. The study mentioned how the spike proteins impede our own BRCA1 and 53BP1 proteins. Hui Jiang Ya-Fang Mei reported: "Mechanistically, we found that the spike protein localizes in the nucleus and inhibits DNA damage repair by impeding key DNA repair protein BRCA1 and 53BP1 recruitment to the damage site. Our findings reveal a potential molecular mechanism by which the spike protein might impede adaptive immunity and underscore the potential side effects of full-length spike-based vaccines." …
"Now what they discovered is that once the spike protein enters the nucleus, it actually inhibits proper fixing of broken, damaged DNA. Specifically, damage of DNA where you have double-stranded break, meaning really you break both strands of the DNA. You shear the DNA in half. You break it in half.
And the way it does negatively impact how the DNA is being fixed is by somehow, it’s still unknown, somehow interfering with how BRCA1 protein is supposed to be used in fixing the DNA damage.
Now BRCA1, if you mutate that gene, it’s one of the highest predispositional mutations for cancer that you can have, is mutations in this particular gene, precisely because BRCA genes code for proteins that are involved in fixing DNA damage, such as fixing DNA that’s sheared in half.
So this is clearly news of great significance, and it should not be taken lightly. It should be reinvestigated, reconfirmed…"
The National Cancer Institute's website says that problems with the BRCA1 protein are well-known to cause Cancer, especially in women: "A woman’s lifetime risk of developing breast and/or ovarian cancer is markedly increased if she inherits a harmful variant in BRCA1 or BRCA2." The NCI says that the likelihood of women developing breast cancer for those with a BRCA1 "variant" increases from 13% in the general population to 55%-72%.
The study authors in Japan used similar language in their April 08, 2024 paper.
As mentioned above, there is also great concern about the risk of dysfunction in the crucial cancer suppressor genes, brca2 and P53, as well as BRCA1, through mechanisms involving downregulation of IRF9 through interference by specific miRNA in exosomes [26] and the possible sequestration by the S2 subunit of S-protein in the vaccine [91]. Impaired BRCA1 activity is associated with higher risk of breast, uterine, and ovarian cancer in women and prostate cancer in men, as well as moderately higher risk of pancreatic cancer in both men and women [92]. BRCA2-associated cancers include breast and ovarian cancer in women, prostate and breast cancer in men, and acute myeloid leukemia in children [26]. These findings are highly consistent with our results.
Charles Wright
Very good information, thank you. Here is another paper that has information tangential to the paper cited here that could provide additional insights: https://www.nature.com/articles/jhg200866
It’s insane that Ray Kurzweill said many new mRNA vaccines are coming & they won’t need human trials since the Covid vaccine has been so successful 🤯🤯