Lady Justice is not blind and she carries a sword.
Justice for Remdesivir Victims
I have started a community on Twitter called Justice for Remdesivir Victims. I looked for an image for the group of Justice. I was surprised to find several images of Justice where the statue carried a sword and had no blindfold.
I never knew she held a sword until now. The image of Justice I knew of is like the one in front of the US Supreme Court building, with her wearing a blindfold. “Justice is Blind.” Apparently she has a sword in her hand here, but it is by her side.
The image below is the one I chose though.
You can see that her sword is raised and their is no blindfold. I looked up the origins of Justice.
Heather and Little, a company that performs restorations on statues, wrote that the blindfold was meant to mock the Judicial system.
Blindfold: This first appeared on a Lady Justice statue in the 16th century and has been used intermittently since then. Apparently, its original significance was that the judicial system was tolerating abuse or ignorance of aspects of the law.
The Supreme Court uses similar language.
The origin of the blindfold is unclear, but it seems to have been added to indicate the tolerance of, or ignorance to, abuse of the law by the judicial system.
The Sword symbolizes power and enforcement of law and morality. We know what the Scales are.
Today’s Lady Justice has taken off her blindfold again, but has yet to do a few things. She has yet to fill her scales, and to take up her sword.
I have spoken to several family members who had loved ones taken by hospitals that coldly used deadly protocols despite their objections. They are women all- daughters, mothers, and wives.
They ask when will they have Justice? I can only answer that they must become Justice. Your cries to the government and the press fall on deaf ears. The people who are sworn to provide Justice are not only blind, but deaf.
Not one is scared of the fight or scared to use the world murder. I have asked them all. I ask them, if you were on a Jury, what would it take for you to return a verdict of guilty beyond a reasonable doubt for murder? That is the evidence you need to gather. It can be done. I wrote this a year ago.
Write an Indictment for Remdesivir victims
Dr. Dawn Michaels has specifically used the term “murder" to describe the death of her husband in a hospital as a result of their use of Remdesivir on her husband. On social media platforms, many other people have said the same things about their loved ones.
Nothing has changed, except more deaths. I wish I had a better answer for you other than “do it yourself,” but that’s all I can think of. I am confident that once you get organized and begin to pursue criminal evidence, that you will be unstoppable. I have no confidence in anyone else other than the victims. Have you heard the saying “if you ask God to move a mountain, be prepared to wake up next to a shovel?”
I know it’s difficult to accept that you must do the job that you are not trained to do, and that others are paid to do. I know it’s a very challenging time dealing with the trauma of losing your loved one.
I invite you all to strategize in the Twitter group or here on this Substack platform. Send me a PM on Twitter to join the group. My strategy is to gain court evidence through FOIA requests. Lawsuits and depositions would be another method.
Fill your scales, then raise your sword.
Charles Wright
Thank you. I will pass this info to my mom. She's on Twitter. I will also brainstorm with her on what information we have that can be used to help in the collective fight.
My husband was killed by the C19 protocols