Since I stated the obvious link between Cancer and the “Vaccines” yesterday, I’m seeing a lot of other people share their information on the topic.
Too much information to just write in a blog. Too important of a topic to just write in a blog.
My suggestion is to have a summit-type thing to get everyone in one place and talk about the data and the theory. The government agencies that are supposed to police things like this are clearly not going to do their job for whatever reason, so that leaves private citizens to do it.
I’m just going to list the people that I’ve seen who have spoken out about cancer and vaccines already. I’m sure there are more. Please list them if you know of them. I’ll edit over time.
And I’m not trying to limit anyone’s field of expertise or topics they might want to discuss. This would just be an example itinerary based on my limited knowledge at the moment. I can edit the credentials and topics later as well.
Speakers:
Ryan Cole - Pathologist, Cancer statistics and theory.
Deborah Conrad - Physicians Assistant, Witness
Theresa Long - Surgeon, DoD Whistleblower, Cancer statistics in DoD databases.
Mikolaj Rasjek - Founder Merogenomics, Genetic Theory of Cancer and Vaccines
Jessica Rose - Mathematician/Immunologist, VAERS cancer statistics and theory.
“Doorless Carp” - Blogger, unknown credentials. Cancer and genetic theory.
Speaking for myself, when I tell people in my peer group, high school education or undergrad college, who work all day and don’t follow censored doctors around the internet, that there are “adverse events associated with the COVID-19 vaccines” in the government’s “Vaccine Adverse Events Recording Statistics,” I get a sort of blank stare look.
The first time I told someone who had taken the vaccines that "the vaccines cause cancer,” I got a reaction. Not a good reaction, as you might expect. You’re going to get denial, anger, all that. But you’re not going to get that blank stare. Cancer is universally hated and feared.
So what I’m suggesting here, in terms of strategy, is to generate simple media headlines. “Vaccine/Cancer Summit convenes.” Potentially: “Vaccine/Cancer Summit concludes that the vaccines cause cancer.” “Fact checkers say the vaccines don’t cause cancer.” “Other fact checkers say that the professional fact checkers are lying again, that vaccines really do cause cancer, because we have a really good document to refer to here with the facts.” So on and so forth. Right now the data and theory is out there, but it’s scattered among sources.
If the data and theory are as strong as they look at the moment, and everyone signs on to a statement of facts about the data and the underlying theory, that will be impossible to ignore. Bloggers and social media influencers are just too strong to silence on that. Use that power before it’s shut down. Fight while you can. Even the inevitable controversy is good. The worst thing is silence.
I think it would be a good idea to summarize what’s out there. It will generate the type of simple message that people who work all day can understand. People can talk about it at the grocery store. It won’t be on the news, but many are getting news from other sources today. The ones who know the truth can pull up a summary document on their cell phones for the skeptics. It will change people’s minds. It could lead to a ban of the vaccines.
Assuming that the data and theory are as sound as it looks, the language can’t be watered-down. I think everyone understands by now that “more studies are needed” type language doesn’t work. If you ever get one of those studies, they always say the same thing - the nonpharma cure doesn’t work, their toxin is safe, etc. Just take a look at Pierre Kory’s article raising hell on how the establishment rigs their studies on Ivermectin.
In a properly functioning government and industry, “more studies are needed” would work just fine. The media would highlight the risk, the appropriate agencies would take the right steps. No one expects that to happen anymore.
So the people in the summit would have to consider themselves to be the authority, not turn over their preliminary report to the authority. To hell with whatever the establishment says or thinks. If you think the vaccines cause cancer, you should say so. More studies are always needed, of course, honest ones, but don’t pull your punches in the meantime. People are injecting cancer-causing toxin into their body every day. If you’re proven wrong later, erring on the side of caution today is still the moral thing to do. If you want change, you have to raise an alarm, raise your voice, and be willing to take on the establishment that you know will come after your career. That’s just the way it is. Many of you are already doing it. Many are not. I sincerely thank the ones who are.
I suggest you get together in a summit, work on the data and theory to your own satisfaction, then put out a statement that uses simple straightforward language that the average person out there can understand.
Charles Wright