I think I’ve asked this question a few times. Let’s look at some “virus” guys. You know them.
McCullough, Leake, November 17, 2022:
“I have always been impressed with the absence of bacterial superinfection and micro- and macro-thrombosis being features that separate COVID-19 from influenza and other viral syndromes.”
Also note Dr. Sam Bailey’s reply to their “it was a virus” article, November 20, 2022:
McCullough claimed in the Substack post that an electron cryotomography study provided evidence of 'SARS-CoV-2'. He disingenuously implied to his readers that this kind of "evidence" has never been dismantled before. The methods section of the cited paper reveals that the authors simply asserted they started with "viral strains" in some obtained specimens. Then, these were mixed with Vero monkey kidney cells and after the cells broke down 4-5 days later, they were prepared for imaging. Various particles were imaged amongst the cellular debris and these were declared to be "virions." (There was no control experiment of course.) Oh dear! They have fallen for one of virology's oldest tricks: what we call the "point and declare" scam. None of these imaged particles have ever been shown to be replication-competent or disease-causing in nature. And none of them have been characterised to see what, if any, genetic material they contain.
Pierre Kory, February 26, 2023
“It was a viral induced pneumonia, no antibacterials were indicated in the majority, and so many in care homes died from a viral pneumonia quickly, that I don’t find it that weird that total antibiotic use dropped. ‘Secondary bacterial pneumonia certainly occurred, but it was relatively rare, even in the ICU! To suggest that everyone was dying of a secondary bacterial pneumonia (like in 1918 Spanish Flu where a bacterial pneumonia actually was the proximate cause of most deaths) is absurd.”
But, then the Feinberg study was published. Secondary Bacterial Pneumonia Drove Many COVID-19 Deaths, April 27, 2023.
Secondary bacterial infection of the lung (pneumonia) was extremely common in patients with COVID-19, affecting almost half the patients who required support from mechanical ventilation. By applying machine learning to medical record data, scientists at Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine have found that secondary bacterial pneumonia that does not resolve was a key driver of death in patients with COVID-19, results published in the Journal of Clinical Investigation.
Bacterial infections may even exceed death rates from the viral infection itself, according to the findings. The scientists also found evidence that COVID-19 does not cause a “cytokine storm,” so often believed to cause death.
Ouch.
What really makes me sick is that no matter how many times I ask this question, not one Doctor in the United States will answer this question. What the Hell did Ivermectin cure in the hospitalized patients who were administered Ivermectin under Court Order? If they got it, they lived. If not, they died. It’s not complicated.
From my perspective, Ivermectin cured bacterial pneumonia and maybe ventilator-induced blood clots. And who knows what else. But who am I? I’m not a Doctor. Doctors won’t even bother to answer the question. How pathetic is that? Please, someone review these cases that were reported by Dr. Mary Bowden, or at least offer an opinion. Anyone.
The Statement of Dr. Mary Bowden on the Mortality Rates of Hospitalized COVID Patients who were and were not Administered Ivermectin under Court Order
From Twitter, February 27, 2023. I reconnected w/ (Beth Parlato) over the weekend…hero lawyer who represented Jason Jones and his wife. She and co-counsel Ralph Lorigo filed 189 cases for hospitalized patients trying to get ivermectin. 80 cases went to hearings/trial. They won about 40 and lost about 40.
Thanks in advance.
Charles Wright
There's a missing piece to the puzzle here.
"What the Hell did Ivermectin cure in the hospitalized patients who were administered Ivermectin under Court Order? If they got it, they lived. If not, they died."
What needs to be included is that those who died were receiving Covid protocol treatments and that is what was killing them. Those who were treated with Ivermectin were likely not- their physician by default likely recognized the dangers of these Covid protocols and opted for a different treatment.
You could consider Ivermectin story as placebo versus being "treated" with something that will kill you.
There is also a huge element in the story that is omitted and that is what was the condition of those being "treated" before they were placed on Covid protocols and/or Ivermectin.
Bacterial pneumonia is often contracted IN hospitals and nursing homes. Once that happened we can be assured they were labelled "Covid" and the death protocols kicked in for many.
I believe they were "cured" of a bio-engineered (polymer-based) micro-parasite that produces snake venom peptides. I believe these "creatures" are vulnerable to medicines and herbs that kill parasites because the engineers who created them ("crispered" the selected parasite DNA) could not remove the vulnerability to anti-parasite meds. Hence the FDA's outright WAR against anything that kills parasites, i.e., Ivermectin, HCQ, etc.
Whatever they try to demonize and stop us gaining access to, is usually the CORRECT remedy.