Why I lost confidence in David Martin, and why I'm concerned about the circumstances.

On June 28, 2022, I wrote an article about David Martin’s efforts to collect information that he said he would use to present to prosecutors. I used this title, regretfully:

And the great news is we have finally enlisted District Attorneys, prosecutors and sheriffs in a lot of counties around the country who are willing to take this up.  All we need now is the public to come forward with the anecdotes and the stories that they know.”

I hadn’t been writing substacks for long. I got a lot of subscribers from this article. My subscribers more than doubled. Several of them emailed me and contacted me on Twitter asking me more about it, and asked for updates. I had to tell them that I was not associated with it and was just reporting what he said. Again I wish I had phrased it differently, like “David Martin says that….”

Time went on, and there was no movement. I felt bad about what I had written, a little duped. I sent an email to the email address listed in the prosecutenow website asking for an update. They did not reply. Finally Mr. Martin did give an update to Stew Peters. I summarized it on October 29, 2022. He said the Attorneys General were not interested, but that he had a “multitude” of Sheriffs.

I recently emailed prosecutenow to ask for an update. They didn’t reply directly, but David went back onto the Stew Peters show and provided an update last night. I’ve transcribed the text, because I don’t think there is a way to embed Rumble videos on Substack yet. Here is a link to the video if you want to see it.

Stew Peters: Yesterday, Stanford Graham was telling me that you now have a multitude of Sheriff’s that are willing to take this to the criminal referral level.  Do you want to talk about that?

David Martin: Yeah, so here’s what we’re doing.  We’ve actually decided that since the Attorneys General generally across the country have decided that this is a dog too big to fight, what we’ve decided is to go to Sheriffs and prosecutors in jurisdictions where we have a combination of the following two things.  And by the way, this is a pitch.  If you know of anybody, if anyone listening to this knows of anybody, who has this profile of a patient we are looking for all of them.

And that never went anywhere either. Later I “unpublished” the articles on Substack. I just republished them so you can read them if you want.

Fast forward to 2023. I did a Twitter Space with Rebecca Charles on July 26, 2023. (My Twitter account is suspended, so I’m going from memory here). The topic was Rebecca’s daughter and her website Death by Hospital Protocol. I was joined by Frank Priebe, an associate of David Martin who had also been speaking with Rebecca. I had been strongly advising Rebecca to pursue a wrongful death lawsuit against Northwell Health. She’s said she would if she could, but needed more money.

The conversation with Mr. Priebe was pleasant. He talked at length about David Martin. I didn’t interrupt him. I didn’t tell him that I was already somewhat familiar with David’s efforts, and I don’t know if he knew or not. Mr. Priebe said some things of interest to me. He said that they had an appointment scheduled with an unnamed state Attorney General, and that this Attorney General backed out for some reason. He also said they had a lot of Sherrifs who also backed out. Then he asked a rhetorical question “why do you think that is?,” implying that they were pressured.

Frank also said that something happened to the data and the website. I tried to get some details but it was unclear what had happened.

I don’t know if it was in this Space or later, but Mr. Priebe said that David Martin was now starting “Prosecute Now 2.0.” I didn’t bother to tell him that I was not interested. My biggest concern here is what happened to all of the personal information?

Later on Twitter, Mr. Priebe asked me to listen to another Twitter Space beginning at a certain time and I did so. The gist of the message, as I understood it, was that people should not risk setting legal precedents that “could be used against us.” This speaker summarized some legal actions to date. I don’t remember his name.

All of these conversations were completely civil and I make no claims to the contrary. I try to keep an open mind and I am subject to persuasion. But I don’t agree with avoiding legal challenges whatsoever. I’ll go on a tangent of my legal views for a few paragraphs before returning.

If the status quo is terrible, what do you have to lose? In my estimation, using the analogy of a card game, I hold a higher card with the Constitution of the United States than the pharmaceutical companies do with the Prep Act. The Ace of Spades if you will in Law. I want to play this card every chance I get and shut this Countermeasures death program down. If you ask me not to play this card, I feel like you are asking me to lose on purpose.

If a lower court wrongly says that the Prep Act is a higher card than the Constitution, ultimately that verdict will wind up in the Supreme Court. It will probably wind up in the Supreme Court regardless of who wins in the lower courts, as long as Constitutinal Law is in question. And if the Supreme Çourt should make a bad verdict, as they have in their past, then we’ll know what we need to do to correct that. If the Supreme Court dares to put the Prep Act over the protections of life and Due Process, then Congress would be pressured to remove their Act. You can also Impech Supreme Court Justices. And so on. Let’s get on with it. The surest way to lose a War is not to fight. We’ve lost far to much already.

The Apathy PSYOPS program of “Can’t because of Prep Act” has been so stunningly effective that pharma has not even had to play their card yet. I say let the defense be the defense. Present your strongest case on the first filing with no regard to the Prep Act or any other piece of unconstitutional law that says murder is legal. Do not self-censor and self-limit. Then we’ll see the defense pharma mounts, and we will destroy their defense. What’s your alternative again?

Back to some other issues of importance.

The impetus for this article are some recent Substacks by Karen Kingston. On October 21, she wrote the “The Sheriff's Letter to Criminally Prosecute Pfizer.” It’s a very impressive and well-written letter. It seems to me that using the term “Sheriff’s Letter” implies that she was influenced by David Martin on using Sheriffs, but I am not sure.

The next day, October 22, Karen wrote about Steve Kirsch’s tweet “you can now sue COVID manufacturers for damages.” “Breaking News’ Pfizer is Liable for the Injury, Diseases and Deaths Caused by their mRNA Injections and They Need to Be Taken off the Market.”

The thing was, Kingston also said that she had been threatened.

Beginning in 2022, I was told by our leaders to get on board with the narrative that Pfizer is shielded under EUA and that they are untouchable… or else! Or else what? The answer was I would be sued or written out of the history of the COVID-19 battle (i.e. blacklisted from media and undergo character assassination….or worse).

Like me, Karen also says the Prep Act is unconstitutional. WARNING: PREP ACT/COVID-19 EUA IMMUNITY IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND IMMORAL

So I don’t know what’s going on here. But if there is some common thread of threats against state Attorneys General, Sheriffs, and Karen Kingston, we sure need to know about it and expose it. Others are being threatened on Substack. I’m not accusing anyone of anything. I know the FBI’s reputation is dirt right now, but I think they should investigate. Maybe there’s nothing to this, but I can’t be sure, and I am raising the issue.

Charles Wright