If you want to know how Fauci became the Nation's foremost expert in Scam Medicine (I used to want to puke when I'd hear Fauxi introduced as our "foremost expert"), Mullis' book is very good. Duesberg's Inventing the AIDs Virus is the Bible. There are also good books by Charles Ortleb (Fauci, The Bernie Madoff of Science - that says it all.) and others. That Fauci stayed in power so long and was such a fraud proves beyond a doubt the Government Medical Establishment is not fixable.
Charles, in his autobiography “Dancing Naked in the Mind Field,” Kary Mullis has a whole chapter about his interactions with Robert Gallo, Luc Montagnier and others regarding HIV being the cause of AIDS. When he talks with Peter Duesenberg, a virologist at Berkeley, he writes:
“I finally understood why I was having so much trouble finding the references that linked HIV to AIDS. There weren’t any, Duesberg said. No one had ever proven that HIV causes AIDS.”
I imagine it would be very informative. I think I will order it. Mullis also spoke very highly of Duesberg in his interview, so I would like to read Duesberg's book as well.
Charles, Duesberg’s book is available in PDF at ResearchGate at the link below. The website indicates that Duesberg himself uploaded the full text of the book.
My one burning question is this: How Can These Charlatans be De-Throned and Imprisoned?
Every new revelation is like picking an old scab; scar tissue will eventually form, much worse than if proper healing had been allowed to happen. But as things are going, it's an ongoing, civilizational gaping wound.
I realize it's tough mentally for the ones that already get it. I certainly feel the same frustrations. Hell I publish how to cure cancer and diseases, and it goes nowhere. I sometimes wonder how much benefit it is to prove things all over from another perspective. I think of a "critical mass" theory, and we're obviously not there yet.
I want to destroy their entire industry and scam, all of it, so rewriting history is something of a necessary duty. Kary's words are haunting. I think the more disbelievers that hear him, the more that will understand the truth. So if I can put neat little links out with good references, others can share them and maybe it will make a difference one person at a time. Some people can't accept "big lies," that their entire industry of virology and vaccinology is a criminal scam. Enough small bits of information, that can change. It changes one person at a time. And that's too slow for you and I to feel good about, I know. What we really need, to answer your question, is just one state Attorney General who is willing to file murder charges against medical professionals regardless of what the Prep Act says. That will change it fast, so I suggest putting political pressure on state Attorneys General.
I'm in Canada. We have something called "Crown Counsel (or "Persecutors" depending on province). Former Nova Scotia MP Randy Hillier, now fighting against his arrest from the Truckers' Convoy, said this yesterday:
"The law was once a shield to protect our civil liberties but has now been co opted into an umbrella to cover-up the incompetence, negligence and malfeasance of our governments; while the process is now wielded like a sword to punish the individual. The Canadian legal system is a machine and monster that does not seek truth nor justice but feeds and grows upon the financial destruction of the victims it creates."
This is the general state of things here, although Kip Werner seems to be making some progress in the lawsuit against Bonnie Henry's vax mandates: https://www.covidconstitutionalchallengebc.ca/
Katherine Watts has been looking at the legal route in the US. As she says in her latest piece "Distrust and suspicion of federal government motives and programs are growing, and that has to happen for the state and county political remedies to become more politically feasible."
'Montagnier was complicit in the HIV/AIDS plague scam.'
Thanks so much for covering this. 40 years of lies about AIDS and the treatment for it. AZT was the trial run for remdisiver and both were deadly drugs that killed the people who took them. Looking back I can’t believe that I fell for the lies, but who would have thought that one’s government was trying to kill people?
The one good thing that has come out of the Rona scam is how truths have been discovered to be total fabrications. We just need to get people to wake up and see it. Some are, but not enough.
" I am now convinced the entire field of virology is a scam (which is different from saying that viruses don’t exist). "
Since one cannot logically prove a negative I prefer the formulation ‘Viruses have never been scientifically proven to exist’ which places the onus of proof onto virology.
Science fiction has taken on a surprising meaning in 2019. It conquered safety and efficacy, then it quickly embraced PCR and spread to asymptomatic spreading coupled with rationale for mask use, and then it went out of control, expanding to variants, rewriting truth on death certificates, changing definitions, almost replacing quarantine with lockdowns. HCQ came along in the company of questionable medical protocols, supplemented with targeted removal of specific renowned concepts from medical practice. Wasn’t enough. Funny statistical data and , never-ending variants seem to win the race, for now.
The “origin” stories were used to deflect attention from the root question: “Does it exist or not?” A high pile of official admissions of “we don’t have it anywhere” (https://www.bitchute.com/video/gvu4NbieSuVb/) should be an earthquake for the whole field, initiating promising careers for dozens of new PhDs and Nobels in social engineering. Didn’t happen. The science fiction team has not even said a word about this amazing public statements from the most renowned scientific organizations. The need to write more papers, multiply quotations, attend international conferences and summits, and appear in podcasts and media shows efficiently overshadowed the only question worth their time.
That's a good link on the FOIA's. I realize that a virus has never been isolated and purified. That doens't necessarily mean that they don't exist. I think calling them pathogens is not logical. They are created from within our cells, at least in nature, before man came along. I wonder how much difference there is if any between a "virus" and an "exosome." I think the problem we have is one of language and definition as much as anything. From an evolutionary perspective, our cells are not producing compounds nature has designed to harm us. I thnk they are along the lines of messengers that activate our immune system when an actual pathogen is present. We form antibodies to them, but that's a good thing. They tell the white blood cells what antibodies to form. That's my amateur view, and it is certainly subject to change.
HIV is a series of proteins isolated from a virus named Visna found in wool. Of the 12 HIV protein patents, Anthony Fauci owns 4 of them. The two HIV proteins in SARS-COV-2 are gp41 and gp120, both patents owned by Fauci. Funny that nobody mentions that.
The so-called viruses have been classified and described in extreme detail, which would suggest that we are quite familiar with them. Are we? As I described in https://thepathishere.substack.com/p/nano-whatever we have ne means to see them (if they are willing to conform to the physical desription provided by virologists) in any way imaginable. Or actual. Which gives rise to more questions.
The absence of one final, conclusive, clear and non-disputable answer to the isolation issue shows that the “science” people don’t really care about it and don’t really see the importance of working with a pure substance definable by one (bio)chemical formula. With mixtures they don’t have any problem because they can always choose some variables and reject others, only to prove their ad hoc point. But… is it “science”?
Invention of “exosome” only complicates the matter. What if we don’t need them and the body resolves the waste problem in another way (not yet known)?
Why does the animal world not know such problems? Animals don’t need 76 injections to prevent something that may happen or may not. Every animal - without any medical intervention whatsoever - is doing far better than the peak of intelligence embodied in humans, from a house fly to rats to cats and dogs to horses and elephants. Not a single animal exercises or jogs to keep fit. Despite this, an elderly cat is as fit for fight (the equivalent of our gym work) and has sense as acute and perceptive as a young one. This is also the case with the animals supposedly closest to us, like hominidae (this origin story is another fairy tale) - they never exercise. Clearly, their biology is clearly different from ours.
You can’t avoid a sobering question: Are WE experimental artificial chimera creatures?
That's an interesting article for sure. Thanks for sharing. I've been looking into the role of bacteria and cancer lately.
I'm not sure what to make of that article, but it does seem like viruses are quite often blamed when bacteria is the culprit. According to Robert Young, the dividing line between bacteria and viruses is whether or not they could pass through the finest filters of the day. In other words many things called viruses are more likely bacteria. I believe the variola viruses (smallpox, monkeypox) are actually bacteria.
I suppose it is noteworthy that this 1990 article was published before Mullis questioned Montagnier. Like Mullis said though, Montagnier didn't put up much of a defense on HIV/AIDS and walked away.
The Gary Null interview of Kary Mullis is on YouTube here
https://youtu.be/W1FXbxDrDrY?si=h0uO0-QgqORekdNb
The problem with Kary is that he helped keep the virus paradigm going because his name was attached to both PCR and biotech.
RIP Luc Montagnier.
Truly shocking Sir!
How Kary Mullis was so honest, right-on!
We really need to define the playing field.
Onward Christian Soldiers!!
The Montagnier rabbit hole is a wild one. The bastards lab was in the Chinese military buildings in Wuhan for the last ten years of his life.
https://www.civilianintelligencenetwork.ca/2021/07/29/sars-cov-2-is-there-a-cure-the-nwo-china-muslim-brotherhood-hcq-dr-luc-montagnier-exposed/
Interesting aside. The book lying on the table in the video is Duesberg’s Inventing the AIDS Virus.
If you want to know how Fauci became the Nation's foremost expert in Scam Medicine (I used to want to puke when I'd hear Fauxi introduced as our "foremost expert"), Mullis' book is very good. Duesberg's Inventing the AIDs Virus is the Bible. There are also good books by Charles Ortleb (Fauci, The Bernie Madoff of Science - that says it all.) and others. That Fauci stayed in power so long and was such a fraud proves beyond a doubt the Government Medical Establishment is not fixable.
Charles, in his autobiography “Dancing Naked in the Mind Field,” Kary Mullis has a whole chapter about his interactions with Robert Gallo, Luc Montagnier and others regarding HIV being the cause of AIDS. When he talks with Peter Duesenberg, a virologist at Berkeley, he writes:
“I finally understood why I was having so much trouble finding the references that linked HIV to AIDS. There weren’t any, Duesberg said. No one had ever proven that HIV causes AIDS.”
I highly recommend the book in its entirety!
I imagine it would be very informative. I think I will order it. Mullis also spoke very highly of Duesberg in his interview, so I would like to read Duesberg's book as well.
Charles, Duesberg’s book is available in PDF at ResearchGate at the link below. The website indicates that Duesberg himself uploaded the full text of the book.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/261948355_Inventing_the_AIDS_Virus
Wow, thank you.
Yes RFKJR says HIV is a harmless virus and does not cause AIDS
I have heard him say that as well. He says Fauci has faked many pandemics, but COVID is real.
My one burning question is this: How Can These Charlatans be De-Throned and Imprisoned?
Every new revelation is like picking an old scab; scar tissue will eventually form, much worse than if proper healing had been allowed to happen. But as things are going, it's an ongoing, civilizational gaping wound.
I realize it's tough mentally for the ones that already get it. I certainly feel the same frustrations. Hell I publish how to cure cancer and diseases, and it goes nowhere. I sometimes wonder how much benefit it is to prove things all over from another perspective. I think of a "critical mass" theory, and we're obviously not there yet.
I want to destroy their entire industry and scam, all of it, so rewriting history is something of a necessary duty. Kary's words are haunting. I think the more disbelievers that hear him, the more that will understand the truth. So if I can put neat little links out with good references, others can share them and maybe it will make a difference one person at a time. Some people can't accept "big lies," that their entire industry of virology and vaccinology is a criminal scam. Enough small bits of information, that can change. It changes one person at a time. And that's too slow for you and I to feel good about, I know. What we really need, to answer your question, is just one state Attorney General who is willing to file murder charges against medical professionals regardless of what the Prep Act says. That will change it fast, so I suggest putting political pressure on state Attorneys General.
I'm in Canada. We have something called "Crown Counsel (or "Persecutors" depending on province). Former Nova Scotia MP Randy Hillier, now fighting against his arrest from the Truckers' Convoy, said this yesterday:
"The law was once a shield to protect our civil liberties but has now been co opted into an umbrella to cover-up the incompetence, negligence and malfeasance of our governments; while the process is now wielded like a sword to punish the individual. The Canadian legal system is a machine and monster that does not seek truth nor justice but feeds and grows upon the financial destruction of the victims it creates."
This is the general state of things here, although Kip Werner seems to be making some progress in the lawsuit against Bonnie Henry's vax mandates: https://www.covidconstitutionalchallengebc.ca/
Katherine Watts has been looking at the legal route in the US. As she says in her latest piece "Distrust and suspicion of federal government motives and programs are growing, and that has to happen for the state and county political remedies to become more politically feasible."
https://bailiwicknews.substack.com/p/for-those-working-at-the-state-and?utm_source=profile&utm_medium=reader2
Great point, and thanks for the link. I subscribe to KW but don't get 'round to them all... will read this!
'Montagnier was complicit in the HIV/AIDS plague scam.'
Thanks so much for covering this. 40 years of lies about AIDS and the treatment for it. AZT was the trial run for remdisiver and both were deadly drugs that killed the people who took them. Looking back I can’t believe that I fell for the lies, but who would have thought that one’s government was trying to kill people?
The one good thing that has come out of the Rona scam is how truths have been discovered to be total fabrications. We just need to get people to wake up and see it. Some are, but not enough.
" I am now convinced the entire field of virology is a scam (which is different from saying that viruses don’t exist). "
Since one cannot logically prove a negative I prefer the formulation ‘Viruses have never been scientifically proven to exist’ which places the onus of proof onto virology.
Science fiction has taken on a surprising meaning in 2019. It conquered safety and efficacy, then it quickly embraced PCR and spread to asymptomatic spreading coupled with rationale for mask use, and then it went out of control, expanding to variants, rewriting truth on death certificates, changing definitions, almost replacing quarantine with lockdowns. HCQ came along in the company of questionable medical protocols, supplemented with targeted removal of specific renowned concepts from medical practice. Wasn’t enough. Funny statistical data and , never-ending variants seem to win the race, for now.
The “origin” stories were used to deflect attention from the root question: “Does it exist or not?” A high pile of official admissions of “we don’t have it anywhere” (https://www.bitchute.com/video/gvu4NbieSuVb/) should be an earthquake for the whole field, initiating promising careers for dozens of new PhDs and Nobels in social engineering. Didn’t happen. The science fiction team has not even said a word about this amazing public statements from the most renowned scientific organizations. The need to write more papers, multiply quotations, attend international conferences and summits, and appear in podcasts and media shows efficiently overshadowed the only question worth their time.
https://christinemasseyfois.substack.com/p/1-page-notarized-declaration-re-hundreds is an amazing continuation of the inquiry initiated by Mullis. The difference is that the answers come in writing and on official stationery.
That's a good link on the FOIA's. I realize that a virus has never been isolated and purified. That doens't necessarily mean that they don't exist. I think calling them pathogens is not logical. They are created from within our cells, at least in nature, before man came along. I wonder how much difference there is if any between a "virus" and an "exosome." I think the problem we have is one of language and definition as much as anything. From an evolutionary perspective, our cells are not producing compounds nature has designed to harm us. I thnk they are along the lines of messengers that activate our immune system when an actual pathogen is present. We form antibodies to them, but that's a good thing. They tell the white blood cells what antibodies to form. That's my amateur view, and it is certainly subject to change.
HIV is a series of proteins isolated from a virus named Visna found in wool. Of the 12 HIV protein patents, Anthony Fauci owns 4 of them. The two HIV proteins in SARS-COV-2 are gp41 and gp120, both patents owned by Fauci. Funny that nobody mentions that.
https://www.civilianintelligencenetwork.ca/2021/07/26/sars-cov-2-is-hiv-and-dr-anthony-fauci-holds-the-patents/
The so-called viruses have been classified and described in extreme detail, which would suggest that we are quite familiar with them. Are we? As I described in https://thepathishere.substack.com/p/nano-whatever we have ne means to see them (if they are willing to conform to the physical desription provided by virologists) in any way imaginable. Or actual. Which gives rise to more questions.
The absence of one final, conclusive, clear and non-disputable answer to the isolation issue shows that the “science” people don’t really care about it and don’t really see the importance of working with a pure substance definable by one (bio)chemical formula. With mixtures they don’t have any problem because they can always choose some variables and reject others, only to prove their ad hoc point. But… is it “science”?
Invention of “exosome” only complicates the matter. What if we don’t need them and the body resolves the waste problem in another way (not yet known)?
Why does the animal world not know such problems? Animals don’t need 76 injections to prevent something that may happen or may not. Every animal - without any medical intervention whatsoever - is doing far better than the peak of intelligence embodied in humans, from a house fly to rats to cats and dogs to horses and elephants. Not a single animal exercises or jogs to keep fit. Despite this, an elderly cat is as fit for fight (the equivalent of our gym work) and has sense as acute and perceptive as a young one. This is also the case with the animals supposedly closest to us, like hominidae (this origin story is another fairy tale) - they never exercise. Clearly, their biology is clearly different from ours.
You can’t avoid a sobering question: Are WE experimental artificial chimera creatures?
The Frenchman recanted and banished to a school in China according to Dr. Robert Young.
That's an interesting article for sure. Thanks for sharing. I've been looking into the role of bacteria and cancer lately.
I'm not sure what to make of that article, but it does seem like viruses are quite often blamed when bacteria is the culprit. According to Robert Young, the dividing line between bacteria and viruses is whether or not they could pass through the finest filters of the day. In other words many things called viruses are more likely bacteria. I believe the variola viruses (smallpox, monkeypox) are actually bacteria.
I suppose it is noteworthy that this 1990 article was published before Mullis questioned Montagnier. Like Mullis said though, Montagnier didn't put up much of a defense on HIV/AIDS and walked away.