25 Comments
User's avatar
Allen's avatar

All alleged Phantom Menace microscopic pathogens rise on a sea of public-health related manufactured hysteria.

Expand full comment
Kathleen Taylor's avatar

From the article: "In this case of COVID vaccines, you are not inoculating yourself against a toxin, you are simply administering the very toxin you would not have acquired otherwise."

Expand full comment
Zoë's avatar

Brilliantly presented - nice and clear.

Expand full comment
Charles Wright's avatar

Yay

Expand full comment
Petra Liverani's avatar

After 4 years studying 9/11 I had an epiphany of recognition that death and injury were staged and immediately could see that 9/11 was really just a massive demolition job cum anti-terror exercise and that a massive propaganda campaign directed to the anticipated disbelievers of the nonsense story had been implemented to maintain their belief in death and injury.

https://petraliverani.substack.com/p/both-believers-and-disbelievers-of

From this learning I deduced the following about psyop MO:

*** Only what is wanted for real is done for real, the rest is faked. This works extremely well for at least two reasons:

--- generally what they want us to believe would be impracticable to do for real

--- the less propaganda corresponds with reality a la Emperors New Clothes, the better it works - when they dupe you right in your face it means greater power for them. Not so powerful to do something for real to make us believe it .... unless of course they want it. It's all about magician's tricks, it's all about mind control.

*** In big psyops, in order to undermine the opposition, multiple streams of propaganda are pushed out massively to distract from the simple fundamental truth and to fragment the opposition.

When covid came on the scene I knew instantly from psyop MO that there would be no virus even though I knew nothing about the "no virus proven" movement and that anything said that didn't have this truth at its base would be controlled opposition so as soon as I heard "there's a virus but ... " and "biolab" I knew controlled opposition.

Expand full comment
Carole's avatar

Orson Welles’ War of the Worlds radio broadcast of 1939 modernized.

Expand full comment
Charles Wright's avatar

Back then, faking things on TV was harder. Science fiction had a comic book feel. By September 11, 2001, graphics had greatly improved, such as the overlay of airplanes hitting the towres, although they still made mistakes. By now, AI can broadcast anything without apparent errors, including human speech. And don't think you've seen the highest versions of AI yet either. That's like saying Apple is selling you their most technologically advanced iPhone instead of putting out a slightly improved one every few years to sell phones. It's a matter of what you will or will not believe is truthful in this era. The difference between entertainment and news is slim.

Expand full comment
Petra Liverani's avatar

Charles, I'm afraid the ability to simulate better is irrelevant to how they do psyops because one of the very key features of psyops is to give the game away by sloppy simulation and deliberate clues that undermine their narrative known as Revelation of the Method or Hidden in Plain Sight.

https://petraliverani.substack.com/i/123858867/when-the-rule-is-that-they-must-tell-us-the-truth-underneath-the-propaganda-how-is-the-rejection-of-the-narrative-in-the-realm-of-theory-the-loaded-question-fallacy

The overlay of Flight 175 into the South tower is done extremely sloppily and in no way aims to simulate the real penetration of a high rise steel frame building assuming it could be achieved ... which I think physics tells us it can't. The point is that the 9/11 story falls over with a massive thud at every single turn .... because seemingly, counterintuitively, the less propaganda corresponds to reality the better it works.

The perps know from millennia of experience that there is a limitless elasticity to the Emperor's New Clothes effect and when analysing psyops it's good to use the lens that they have engineered their story to be utterly ridiculous because it works better that way anyway.

Even if you wanted to debate whether or not a passenger airliner could fly at the alleged speed and penetrate a high rise steel frame building to whatever degree, right off the bat we know it is completely against reality to do it without showing signs of a collision ... but there is no sign whatsoever of a collision - no debris, no signs of deceleration, it penetrates the building like a knife through butter.

It's all hidden in "plane" sight.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xuhNR6lx97E

Expand full comment
Charles Wright's avatar

I have a section on 9/11 on this substack if you are interested.

https://charleswright1.substack.com/s/september-11-2001

Expand full comment
Petra Liverani's avatar

You seem to be missing a crucial point though Charles.

What was the biggest alleged crime on 9/11?

Expand full comment
Carole's avatar

Ah, yes, the TV and now the screens on the phones. All Tell A Vision. Can’t take credit for that analogy. The question is whose vision is it.

Expand full comment
Sam's avatar

"This Crimson Contagion event ultimately culminated with President Trump signing an executive order on September 19th, 2019,…."

Is that when Trump said that this was ‘the calm before the storm' and then smiled wickedly? And how did event 201 play into the narrative?

Expand full comment
Sam's avatar

I want to know what information congress got at the beginning of the Rona scam that made them to decide to sell and buy stocks. A few of them broke the rules for how congress was allowed to do that, but of course nothing happened to them. It’s the first thing that came to mind just after reading 2 sentences. I’ll finish reading it.

Expand full comment
Charles Wright's avatar

Rand Paul and Gilead come to mind. Not a fan.

Expand full comment
Sol Sön's avatar

Good piece but

The so called virus was out in 2019

I wrote something about it here

And yes the once in the shot are the makers.

Never mind the typos, have a good read.

https://mywisdom.substack.com/p/pt4-letters-from-the-edge-of-dystopia

Thanks for sharing

Expand full comment
Charles Wright's avatar

It came to life as a unique sequence when it was uploaded. Sure, disease symptoms, toxins, were around as they always have been.

Expand full comment
Sol Sön's avatar

I know of someone who was sick and hospitalized with an unknown type of respiratory disease in September 2019, “ over two weeks”, later when the so called pandemic came out, was brought back for new testing and was told that had the alleged corona in 2019, was also told that there was other “cases” with the same sickness, at same time, and then was told that it was a matter of national security and ordered not to tell anyone about it.

I have also heard that the original strain so weak that it mutates almost immediately.

One more, some alleges that it was delivered as some kind of aerosol substance, because it acts like some kind of acid, neutralizing the sense of taste and of smell, as well as the respiratory system .

Any how read the all p4, of my letters from the edge of dystopia, there is more.

Expand full comment
Charles Wright's avatar

PCR tests are meaningless for viruses. A virus has never been isolated and sequenced. PCR tests compare minute amounts of material to minute portions of other unknown and probably common material that was in the original sequence developed by unscientific methods. No wonder people test positive. They test positive if they are sick or not. Fruit tests positive. Again it's just a meaningless test.

Expand full comment
Sol Sön's avatar

There was no pcr in 2019, at list not officially, traditional tests were conducted then and were kept and somehow confronted with the later “sars cov 2” “cases” . I guess the original strain mutated and got lost in the mutations, but they had samples which they confronted, and that is the story.

I guess they don’t want the truth to be told.

I mean, can you immagine?

The thing was actually produced by a UN sponsored project. Or is it by the one sponsoring the the UN? You know same owner.

Expand full comment
Charles Wright's avatar

Fascinating stuff. Please keep us informed on your National Security briefings.

Expand full comment
Sol Sön's avatar

That is it that’s all I know about it “as a fact”.

The rest is allegations.

They patented the virus in 2016, someone mentioned it at the start of the scamdemic

I have seen the patent in 2020 and got confirmation from a doctor which looked into it a told me that indeed was real, then The Italian government started to run after bloggers and shooting down sites, and the article from which I learn about the lab disappeared. “Nevertheless the lab is still there”

Also I then stop writing on substack and as you can see, I did not post anything from then “two years ago” till the Gaza genocide begun, nevertheless the patent is there and if you do some research you should find it.

Anyhow thank you for keeping us informed with your deeply researched articles.

Sol

Expand full comment