My Evolution of Theory on Ivermectin, COVID, and Cancer.

There’s been a lot of controversy and some changing narratives on Ivermectin. One thing I’ve learned from all this research is that you never really stop learning. I try to keep an open mind about things and accept new facts even if those facts challenge a previous belief or position.

My changing theory on Ivermectin over time has been laid out for all to see. I’ll incude all the articles I have written about Ivermectin from 2021-2024 below.

Initially, I thought Ivermectin was an antiviral that cured COVID, as described by Pierre Kory and several other doctors. The most quoted example of how Ivermectin cured COVID was in Uttar Pradesh, India. In late 2021 and early 2022, I wrote about Uttar Pradesh, but also took a look at Japan and Nigeria.

And most certainly among groups that were taking Ivermectin, as opposed to people that were taking vaccines and suffering hospital protocols, there is a staggering difference in mortality. There is no question about this. The question becomes however, did Ivermectin cure a deadly SARS-CoV-2 virus, or were vaccines and hospital protocols the primary cause of death of people said to have a virus?

At this point I had bought into the statistical deception. I had no education in microbiology and had not researched microbiology much at this point. Like doctors Yeadon and Mullis before him, I thought the virologists were credible at this point. That is to say, I thought the SARS-CoV-2 sequence was genuine at this point.

Let’s say we took three large groups of doctors and conducted a clinical trial. The disease is whatever I say it is based on some tiny microparticle that I say causes death and disease. I confirm the presence of said microparticle with a PCR test in the doctors. The doctors do not get to question what said microparticle is or how the genetic sequence of the microparticle was generated in the first place. Those are the rules. I’ll make sure to include enough common elements in the computer-generated microparticle sequence to be found in 100% of the doctors nasal membranes.

In one group, the doctors are given only chocolate chip cookies and Miller Lite for the duration of the trial. In another, doctors are injected with a “vaccine” cocktail of PEG (antifreeze), mRNA coated in lipid nanoparticles that create a toxic “spike protein” within the cells of their bodies, and quite likely, Graphene, which causes myocarditis. In another large group, the doctors are given the Pierre Kory/Beth Israel protocol which appears to be Remdesivir followed by ventilators in conjunction with very high doses of opioids and tranquilizers.

Compare the death rates between each group. At this point in 2024, would you say that chocolate chip cookies and Miller Lite cured the effects of the microparticle, or would you say that vaccines and hospital protocols simply killed the doctors?

Such is the statistical deception with Ivermectin and COVID. Further complicating matters, Ivermectin is an antibiotic produced by bacteria themselves which they use to kill other bacteria in a literal “turf war” in the soil. Sepsis and ARDS are a result of bacteria created by the hospital protocols. Ivermectin frequently led to seemingly-miraculous recoveries of hospitalized “COVID” patients. The effects of Ivermectin were described by doctors like Pierre Kory as antiviral effects. It was not an easy statistical deception to see through.

It turns out that Doctor Kory was creating sepsis and ARDS in his patients at a high rate with ventilators, drugs, and tranquilizers, resulting in a high rate of death. I call Doctor Kory’s reporting of the antiviral effects of Ivermectin the “Ivermectin Albi,” as only he was killing his patients, not a virus.

Moving forward into September 2022, I became aware through the Substacker Doorless Carp of reports of a reduction in cancer after administration of Ivermectin in the Phillippines by Dr. Alan Landrito. An engineer from Spain, A. M. Gonzalez, who had also participated in the distribution of Ivermectin, had taken Ivermectin himself and noticed an improvement in his prostate problems. Gonzalez began informal, underfunded, volunteer trials of the effects of Ivermectin on cancer and the prostate. I wrote several articles about these trials.

I remember that I did not have such a low opinion of Dr. Kory then as I do now. I was still under the effects of Ivermectin’s “antiviral” illusion. At one point, I listened in on a conference call where A. M. Gonzalez tried to recruit Dr. Kory into making a public statement about the anti-cancer effects of Ivermectin, and mention the trial of Gonzalez to give it some much-needed publicity, which might give him some much-needed publicity and hopefully lead to funding for the study of Gonzalez.

Kory wasn’t interested, and didn’t talk about the anti-cancer effects of Ivermectin at all, but I remember that Kory said there were many known substances that effectively treated cancer. I don’t remember what he named, but I think they were all common antibiotics.

A few weeks prior to January 29, 2023, Mr. Gonzalez told me on Telegram of a major development in his theory of how Ivermectin cured cancer. It was by no means a new theory, but was apparently the first time that he had heard of it, and certainly the first time I had heard of it. Gonzalez had spoken to an author of a paper on the “biofilm” theory of cancer, where bacteria form a sort of impenetrable shield over tumors in some form of a symbiotic reletionship. In order to kill the cancer cells, it was first necessary to kill the bacteria. These bacteria appear to be “Gramm-negative,” which means that this class of bacteria have very strong cellular walls that are difficult for the immune system to penetrate and kill. Strong antibiotics like Ivermectin can apparently kill these bacteria and allow the body’s own immune system to attack the cancer cells. Gonzalez reported this to me as a “two-part” process. I wrote about this very interesting and promising theory on January 29, 2023.

In retrospect, this early 2023 period marked a major change in my understanding of the mechanism of action of Ivermectin. If Ivermectin reversed cancer by antibacterial effects, how was it saving lives in hospitalized “COVID” patients?

In February 2023, Dr. Mary Bowden reported on Twitter that hospitalized “COVID” patients who received Ivermectin under court order generally lived, and that those who did not receive Ivermectin generally died. Following Dr. Mary Bowden on Twitter greatly influenced my thinking. I wrote several articles referencing her. I later copied her tweets on the mortality rates of patients who did or did not receive Ivermectin into Substack in December 2023. Dr. Bowden reported frequently that she had treated over 5,000 “COVID” patients with Ivermectin, Hydroxychloroquine, Quercetin, and monoclonal antibodies as supply of those substances dictated. Initially, I felt that proper Medicine could “cure COVID,” and that other doctors were needlessly and recklessly killing their patients according to protocols. Later, as I mentioned earlier, I realized that there was no novel coronavirus. At one point on Twitter, I asked Dr. Bowden if she thought Ivermectin reversed bacterial sepsis, or cured a virus, and referenced the April 2023 report of Northwestern University which reported that a large percentage of “COVID” deaths were due to bacterial pneumonia caused by ventilators. She did not respond. Dr. Bowden later joined the FLCCC under President Pierre Kory.

I don’t remember when I first heard Dr. Kory’s December 8, 2020 testimony to the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, but I remember being shocked by it. All of the information I had heard on social media and subsequent mainstream media “fact checking” of Kory’s statements centered around the controversy of whether or not Ivermectin cured “COVID.” I had never heard that Dr. Kory’s patients were dying at a high rate, which he told told the Senate in no uncertain terms. This is the danger in letting others report things to you instead of getting your information from original sources, and error of trust that I made. I wrote an article in December 2023 asking Dr. Kory for detailed information on the treatments he used that resulted in so many deaths. Dr. Kory never responded.

In February 2024, I wrote that Dr. Kory should be charged under 18 USC for materially misrepresenting his testimony to the Senate, a statement I still stand by. Kory told the Senate Committee that a virus was killing his patients, and that this virus could be cured with Ivermectin. Kory knew full well that his use of ventilators and drugs resulted in the death his patients, and that Ivermectin could reverse bacterial pneumonia and ARDS caused by his own hand. Kory could have saved countless lives by telling the truth, but he chose to create a false Alibi for himself. He only had to stop doing what he was doing to save lives.

Whether or not Ivermectin can cause Infertility has become a hot topic in 2024. I remember reading a report on Twitter long ago, maybe 2021 or 2022, about a study from Nigeria that reported deformed sperm and lower sperm counts in Nigerian males. I wish I had researched and reported it earlier. I reported the results of my first investigation on this topic in May 2024. By this point, I was well aware that Ivermectin was an antibiotic. The administration of antibiotics during pregnancy is generally considered to be bad practice. Ivermectin was discovered as part of a Merck bacterial research project allegedly to kill nematodes. If you look at pictures of sperm and nematodes, tell me how much of a difference there is. Others have reported that Ivermectin has been used as a pesticide to kill spiders and ants, so we’re talking about some strong stuff here, if those reports are correct. But as I say with everything, where you can test, test. I was educated in Econometrics to form a hypothesis and confirm or reject the hypothesis with data analysis. It is not by choice that I report theory alone. Why not get the answer? I suggest that researchers put some Ivermectin in a petri dish with sperm, eggs, and embryos and report the results. I’ll wager that Ivermectin is very damaging to them and would likely kill them all, but that is a theory. None of this means, however, that you should not use Ivermectin for cancer if you are not trying to have children. Ivermectin appears to be generally well-tolerated in adults, but not so in the smaller and more simple life forms that you produce in your body which are involved in reproduction. Another reservation that I have about Ivermectin is whether or not it can cause changes in human DNA- a topic I have not yet researched.

Numerous other factors have influenced my evolution of theory on Ivermectin, COVID, and cancer. A full account would be long and winding, but I will briefly outline some major influences. Dr. Robert Young and others reported early that the SARS-CoV-2 virus was never isolated and sequenced to begin with. The Baileys have reported that virus sequences are generated by computer programs that break down and reassemble small fragments of a large amount of unidentified substances into a predetermined virus sequence template. The virus sequence itself is fraudulent. If one were to create an accurate PCR test for a fraudulent sequence, it would likely return 0% positive results. In fact that’s exactly what happened in New York in February 2020 when the CDC consistently returned 100% negative “COVID” results to the state of New York. Later Governor Cuomo of New York lobbied Mike Pence to allow New York to create its own PCR test, which led to a a high percentage of positive results and subsequent deaths after ventilators and drugs were used against people with positive PCR results.

I will spare you my lengthy journeys down the dead-end rabbit holes of “natural spillover of viruses between species” and “gain-of-function research.” Suffice to say, if scientists could make disease spread by these methods, they would do so, instead of resorting to killing people with Hospital Protocols and tricking people into injecting “gain-of-function research” into their bodies with disinformation. Why do you think they call “gain-of-function research” in mice in Wuhan a virus, and “gain-of-function research” in humans a vaccine anyway, do you think? Oh, but it escaped and spread around the world. No, it didn’t. Disinformation, Fear, Lockdowns, Hospital Protocols, PCR tests, and Vaccines spread around the world as anyone can plainly see in retrospect. Again, I was initially duped as well.

Of further note, my cancer research began before COVID. I researched the history of the FDA and determined that the “disasters” of Sulfanilamide (which was really due to PEG) and Thalidomide were intentional events designed to increase the regulatory authority of the FDA. I also determined that the entire history of cancer research was designed to understand how to create cancer in the general population with food additives, pharmaceutical products, and pollution. They actually award Nobel Prizes for creating cancer. I was quick to determine that the government and media were lying, but too quick to accept the “counternarritive” that many things cured a virus that never existed in the first place.

Also, for full disclosure in my reporting, I report here for the first time that the FLCCC began trials of Ivermectin and cancer according to an article Mary Beth Pfeiffer of TrialSite News dated January 30, 2024. I had some email exchanges with Dr. Mary Bowden on the existing volunteer Ivermectin/Cancer trials in September 2022, and with Dr. Mollie James on an Ivermectin/Cancer trial model of my own design in January 2023. These emails will remain private communications as they were intended. I make no claims regarding these emails. Drs. Bowden and James are involved in the FLCCC Ivermectin/cancer trials, I believe.

The point of this disclosure being that my inability to raise funds or recruit members for trials should not be considered a basis for my reporting on Dr. Kory and Dr. Marik. A major goal of my reporting is to give others the information they need to take actions of their own, something I wish people would do more of. In a way, I was proud that the FLCCC began Ivermectin/Cancer trials. It is an unfortunate set of circumstances that the founders of the FLCCC, Dr. Kory and Dr. Marik, are hell-bent on concealing the antibiotic effects of Ivermectin on hospitalized “COVID” patients with a fictitious virus.

Dr. Marik leads the FLCCC trials. Because Kory and Marik have concealed the antibiotic effects of Ivermectin on hospitalized “COVID” patients, I believe that they have an extreme conflict of interest in reporting the antibiotic effects of Ivermectin in cancer masses, which I believe is the primary method of action of Ivermectin on cancer. Marik has reported a lot of studies referencing anticancer effects of Ivermectin which I believe occur downstream of killing bacteria, without once mentioning initial antibiotic effects.

I cannot change the fact that these doctors have killed their patients anymore than they can, and I will not let it go without reporting. Justice must be served in this Countermeasures Holocaust. That’s the way I feel about it, and there’s not one person I’ve spoken to who had a loved one killed in hospitals in the name of “COVID” who disagrees. Drs. Kory and Marik should not be involved in Medicine or clinical trials whatsoever, and should instead be in prison at a minimum for deaths by their hands. I wish things were different, but if we let this stand without criminal punishment, what’s next?

Recently in 2024, I have reported that Dr. Peyton Rous, who won a Nobel Prize in 1966 for creating cancer with what was described as a virus, knew full well that his results were due to bacterial plasmids. I also followed up on the excellent report of . …. , which described the oncogenic effects of Simian Virus #40, which she describes as actually a bacterial plasmid that switches off anti-tumor genes such as P53, which are better described as genes that are naturally switched off as cells divide in a fetus.

So that’s the state of my understanding of Ivermectin, COVID, and cancer at this point. I don’t fault people for being behind on information because I have been behind on it myself. I hope this article serves to get you up to my speed and understanding, at least, although I don’t doubt that there is still much more to learn.

To summarize, there was no novel coronavirus. Antiviral effects of Ivermectin reported by doctors have been used to protect their criminal guilt due to their use of ventilators and deadly drugs. Many patients were killed in hospitals by doctors who created bacterial sepsis and ARDS, which Ivermectin can reverse. Ivermectin is an antibiotic which can help treat cancer, but risks of fertility must be considered.

And finally, Rancourt et al reported from a macro view of international data that deaths ascribed to “COVID” were from three main factors: Lockdowns, Hospital Protocols, and Vaccines. This is the same conclusion that I came to from the micro side.

Several articles on Ivermectin and related topics are included in chronological order below so that you can see how my reporting evolved over time. All are free articles except two- one on Peyton Rous and cancer, and one on Governor Cuomo and the shift in PCR testing in New York from the CDC to New York.

If you feel that my reporting is valuable, please consider a small donation in the Buy Me a Coffee link, or upgrade to a paid subscription to support my research. I realize that reporting the truth is disconcerting and off-putting in some ways, especially when you’ve been duped by heroes that turn out to be criminals, but that only goes to prove the old adage that “the truth hurts.”

The public says that they want the truth in reporting. You’ll get it here to the best of my abilities here, although again I’m not perfect and have changed my mind on some things as you’ll see below. Whether or not you choose to support my reporting is up to you. Many thanks to all of you who already have.

December 23, 2021.

December 28, 2021.

May 22, 2022.

June 10, 2022.

September 4, 2022.

September 29, 2022.

October 5, 2022.

October 29, 2022.

November 1, 2022.

November 4, 2022.

November 4, 2022.

November 11, 2022.

November 13, 2022.

November 18, 2022.

December 07, 2022.

December 10, 2022.

December 19, 2022.

January 7, 2023.

January 29, 2023.

February 25, 2023.

May 17, 2023.

August 7, 2023.

August 20, 2023.

September 25, 2023.

November 8, 2023.

December 04, 2023.

December 17, 2023.

December 22, 2023.

December 27, 2023.

December 31, 2023.

January 16, 2024.

February 08, 2024.

February 9, 2024.

March 12, 2024.

March 18, 2024.

March 23, 2024.

May 4, 2024.

May 6, 2024.

May 14, 2024.

May 28, 2024.

August 16, 2024.

September 03, 2023.

September 07, 2024.

September 14, 2024.